 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Complementary tensordriven image coherence diffusion for oriented structure enhancement
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing volume 2011, Article number: 70 (2011)
Abstract
Oriented structure enhancement plays important role in computer vision tasks, where the diffusion is encouraged along the preferred direction instead of perpendicular to it. By analyzing the differential geometric property of the oriented structure, a complementary tensor is proposed by combining the first and the secondorder structure tensors as complementary descriptors, which can precisely analyze not only the step edges, but also the weak edges such as narrow peak or ridgelike structures. Complementary diffusion tensor is constructed from the new structure tensor, which steers coherence diffusion for oriented structure enhancement. Furthermore, fast algorithm based on additive operator splitting scheme is used for numerical solution, which is much faster than usual approach. The experimental results on several images are provided. Experiments show that the image diffusion process steered by the new complementary tensor can strengthen the oriented structures and also close the interrupted lines as well. Both strong and weak edges are enhanced while noise is removed. Our approach is very promising and could be applied to many other images.
1. Introduction
Image enhancement is an important preprocessing step that removes noise while preserving semantically important structures such as edges and oriented structures. This may give great help for simplifying subsequent image analysis like segmentation and understanding. In recent years, nonlinear PDEbased diffusion for image enhancement has attracted much attention for its adaptive behavior in a purely datadriven way that is flexible enough to cope with the rich image structures [1].
Image diffusion by nonlinear partial differential equation (PDE) approach was first introduced by Perona and Malik [2], followed by their study, numerous nonlinear diffusion filters have been proposed [3–8]. However, most of them use a scalar diffusivity thus the diffusion flux is along gradient direction, which may blur edges. Besides that, such isotropic diffusion cannot preserve the oriented structures precisely [1, 7].
With the increasing appearance of oriented structures in many computer vision and image processing problems, for instance pulmonary vessels, trabecular bone, fingerprint, paintings, wood texture, etc. Many attempts on oriented patterns enhancement have been made [9–12]. PDEbased coherenceenhancing diffusion has proved to be an attractive tool, which is an anisotropic diffusion steered by the diffusion tensor that allows a more flexible orientationdependent filtering [10, 11].
There are two important steps for coherenceenhancing diffusion: first analyze coherent structures and second enhance it. Structure tensor is an important descriptor for coherence analyzing, whose eigenvectors and eigenvalues can provide coherent direction and measurement, respectively. From the structure tensor, the diffusion tensor is constructed such that its eigenvalues encourage the diffusion along the coherent direction than across to it, which steers the coherent diffusion.
Precise coherence analysis is crucial to the diffusion behavior. The original structure tensor was proposed by Cottete and Germain [13], i.e., the tensor product of the gradient: ${J}_{0}=\nabla {u}_{\sigma}\otimes \nabla {u}_{\sigma}^{T}$, where u_{ σ } = G _{ σ } *u is the slightly smooth version image by convolving u with Gauss kernel G_{ σ } . The eigenvalues of J_{0} provide coherent measurement and one of the eigenvectors provides the coherent direction. However, the simple structure tensor fails in analyzing corners or parallel structures. To solve this problem, Weickert [10, 11] proposed the structure tensor: ${J}_{\rho}={G}_{\rho}*\left(\nabla {u}_{\sigma}\otimes \nabla {u}_{\sigma}^{T}\right)$. The eigenvalues of J_{ρ} measure the variation of the gray values within a window size of order ρ. This structure tensor is useful to analyze strong edges, corners, and Tjunctions. Brox and Weickert [14] proposed a nonlinear structure tensor by diffusing J_{0} under the image gradient field ∇u, which may bring much computational cost. However, the above structure tensors are essentially linear smoothing of J_{0}, and use only the local average of the firstorder differential information. Many image features such as narrow peaks, ridgelike edges could not accurately be described by J_{ ρ } for the gradient is close to zero on these structures.
By analyzing the first and secondorder directional derivatives of the different edges, we propose a new structure tensor which is a desirable descriptor for analyzing not only strong edges, but also weak edges such as narrow peaks or ridgelike structures. The proposed structure tensor combines the first and the secondorder structure tensors as complementary descriptors that play important roles on detecting different kind of edges. The complementary diffusion tensor is constructed from the new structure tensors, which can steer the coherence diffusion controlled by a switch parameter. The diffusion can preserve not only strong edges, but also weak edges precisely while removing the noise. Furthermore, numerical implementation is solved by the additive operator splitting (AOS) scheme, resulting in fast convergence rate.
The remainder of the article is organized as follows. In Section 2, mathematical background of the coherence diffusion is outlined. In Section 3, edge structure tensor is proposed by combing the first and the secondorder structure tensors as complementary pairs. In Section 4, a complementary diffusion tensor is constructed from the new structure tensor. In Section 5, efficient numerical implementation of the diffusion PDE by fast AOS scheme is provided, and in Section 6, experimental results are provided and compared with that of the other methods. Finally, in Section 7, conclusions are reported.
2. Coherence diffusion
In image processing, the anisotropic diffusion process is equivalent to minimizing the following energy variational:
where f denotes the original image defined on the image domain Ω and u the diffusion image. β is a small positive. ψ(s^{2} ) denotes a penalizing function that is differential in its argument and convex in s.
From variational method, we can derive the following Euler Lagrange equations of anisotropic diffusion [15]:
The detailed derivative can be found in [16].
It ${\psi}^{\prime}\left(\nabla u\cdot \nabla {u}^{T}\right)\stackrel{\Delta}{=}D\left(\nabla u\cdot \nabla {u}^{T}\right)$, then Equation 2 is the steadystate solution of the following PDE with the reflecting boundary condition and the original f as the initial condition:
where D(·) is the diffusion tensor and is a positive definite symmetric matrix. In the coherence diffusion case, it is desirable to rotate the diffusion tensor such that the diffusion is encouraged along the orientation of interesting features instead of perpendicular to it. The desired oriented direction is called coherent direction along which the diffusion performs more sufficient.
Designing diffusion tensor D is crucial to the diffusion process. To steer the coherence diffusion, the differential geometry property of oriented structure must be analyzed so as to detect the oriented structure and the coherent direction precisely.
3. Edge structure and its differential geometric property
The edge in image is defined as the position where the gray value changed suddenly. This kind of edge always refers to either step edge or the strong edge. The strong edge can easily be detected from the extreme of its first derivative. However, there are many oriented structures such as narrow peaks, ridgelike, or flowlike patterns in images. However, their first derivative is zero. We called them weak edges. These patterns play very important role as the strong edge did. Therefore, finding out the method for detecting and enhancing these oriented structure is also in great need.
Let us denote the intensity image by u(x, y). The directional derivative of U at point (x, y) in the direction, α = (cosθ, sinθ) ^{T} is denoted by u_{ α } (x, y). It is defined as:
The secondorof u along direction α is denoted by ${u}_{\alpha}^{\u2033}\left(x,y\right)$, and it follows that
where H is the Hessian matrix of u.
Figure 1 shows the Edge structure and its differential geometric property. Figure 1a, b shows the step edges and its first and secondorder derivatives. We could see that its firstorder derivative can reach its extreme. Therefore, the strong edge can be detected by its first derivative.
In the following, we could see that the geometry property of the strong edge can by analyzed by the structure tensor: ${J}_{0}=\nabla {u}_{\sigma}\otimes \nabla {u}_{\sigma}^{T}$, where u_{σ} = G_{σ} *u is the slightly smooth version image by convolving u with Gauss kernel G_{ σ } . We call J_{0} the firstorder structure tensor.
From linear algebra, we can derive that the two eigenvalues of J_{0} are ${\mu}_{1}=\nabla {u}_{\sigma}{}^{2},{\mu}_{2}=0$, and the corresponding eigenvectors are ${e}_{1}=\frac{\nabla {u}_{}^{\sigma}}{\nabla {u}_{\sigma}}$, ${e}_{2}=\frac{\nabla {u}_{\sigma}^{\perp}}{\nabla {u}_{\sigma}}$, where $\nabla {u}_{\sigma}^{\perp}$ denotes the vector that is perpendicular to ∇u_{ σ } . We know that the direction of ∇u_{ σ } is perpendicular to the edge. Therefore, we can conclude that the coherent direction is ${e}_{2}\u2225\nabla {u}_{\sigma}^{\perp}$, because the desired diffusion direction is along the edge but not across ro it.
Figure 1c, d shows the weak edge, whose firstorder directional differential is zero. However, we could see that the ridgelike structure has the extremum on its secondorder directional differential. Let μ_{1}, μ_{2} (μ_{1} ≥ μ_{2}) denote the eigenvalues of H and e_{1}, e_{2} the corresponding eigenvectors. From Rayleigh's quotient [17], we can derive that
So, the eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix are exactly the two extreme of ${u}_{\alpha}^{\u2033}$ and the corresponding eigenvectors are the directions along which the second directional derivative reaches its extreme.
Since the Hessian matrix can describe the secondorder structure of the local intensity variations along the eigenvectors, we call it secondorder structure tensor and denote it as J_{ H } = H_{ σ } , where H_{ σ } is the Hessian matrix of u_{ σ } .
From Figure 1c, d, we can see that when there are dark (bright) narrow long structures in the image, ${u}_{\alpha}^{\u2033}$ reaches its maximum (minimum) along eigenvectors e_{1} (e_{2}). As a result, the coherent direction is along e_{2} (e_{1}), respectively.
From above, we can conclude that the first and the secondorder structure tensors play complementary role in detecting different kinds of edges. Let us use J_{ ρ } = G _{ ρ } *J_{0}, where G _{ ρ } is the Gauss kernel, to replace J_{0}. The firstorder structure tensor J_{ ρ } is useful to analyze strong edges such as step edge, corners, and Tjunctions, while fails in detecting weak edges precisely. However, the secondorder structure tensor J_{ H } can capture weak edges as narrow peaks and ridgelike structures while fails in detecting strong edges. Therefore, the two structure tensors J_{ ρ } and J_{ H } can be complementary to each other and provide reliable coherence estimation on different structures.
4. Complementary diffusion tensor
A natural way to construct diffusion tensor D is from structure tensor J such that D has the same eigenvectors as J and its eigenvalues prefer the diffusion along the coherent direction than across to it.
Let μ_{1}, μ_{2} (μ 1 ≥ μ_{2}) denote the eigenvalues of J and e_{1}, e_{2} the corresponding eigenvectors. The coherent direction estimated from J is denoted by e_{(co)} and the orthogonal direction by ${e}_{\left(co\right)}^{\perp}$.
When μ_{1} >> μ_{2}, it corresponds to anisotropicoriented structure. When μ_{1 ≈}μ_{2}, it corresponds to isotropic structures. The coherence measurement is given by K = (μ_{1}  μ_{2)}^{2}. To encourage coherent diffusion, the eigenvalues of D can be chosen as follows [10, 11]:
where λ_{(co)}and ${\lambda}_{\left(co\right)}^{\perp}$ are the diffusivity along the direction e_{(co)}and ${e}_{\left(co\right)}^{\perp}$, respectively. γ > 0 serves as a threshold parameter. We can see that λ_{(co)}is an increasing function with respect to the coherence measurement K. when (μ_{1}  μ_{2})^{2} > > γ, λ_{(co)} ≈1. Otherwise, it leads to λ_{(co)} ≈c, where c∈(0, 1) is small positive parameter that guarantees that D is positive definite. It means that the more coherent the structure is, the more diffusion along the coherent direction e_{(co)}is. Whereas the diffusion is not preferred at the direction of ${e}_{\left(co\right)}^{\perp}$ as the diffusivity is very small there.
Therefore, D can be obtained by
where $P=\left({e}_{\left(co\right)},{e}_{\left(co\right)}^{\perp}\right)$ is the eigenvector matrix.
A switch parameter T is introduced to control the roles of the two structure tensors in detecting different coherent structures. When $\nabla {u}_{\sigma}\ge T$, J_{ ρ } is available to detect strong edges. Whereas $\nabla {u}_{\sigma}<T$, J_{ H } is more reliable to detect weak edges.
Let D_{ ρ }, D_{ H } denote the diffusion tensor constructed from J_{ ρ } and J_{ H } , respectively. Therefore, the diffusion tensor is given by
when $\nabla {u}_{\sigma}\ge T$, the coherent direction of D is always along $\nabla {u}_{\sigma}^{\perp}$; Otherwise, it is along ${e}_{\left(\mathsf{\text{co}}\right)}^{\left(H\right)}$ that is the coherent direction estimated from J_{ H } . It is noted that the coherent direction estimated from J_{ H } can be divided into the following two cases. When there are dark curvilinear structures in the bright background, the coherent direction is along e_{2}. Otherwise there are bright curvilinear structures in the dark background, the coherent direction is along e_{ 1 } .
Substitute (8) into Equation 3, we can obtain the following partial differential diffusion equation:
Equation 9 states that the diffusion tensor can steer a complementary coherence diffusion controlled by the parameter T, where the two diffusion process are both coherent and can strength the step edge, corners as well as narrow peaks, ridgelike structures while smoothing the interior of the image.
5. Numerical implementation by parallel AOS algorithm
The numerical solution of the diffusion equation (9) can be implemented by the semiimplicit discretization and AOS scheme [10, 18]. It is a parallel algorithm and has fast algorithm for inverse matrix. Therefore, it is 10 times faster than usual numerical method.
As the diffusion tensor D is a positive definite symmetric matrix, let $D=\left(\begin{array}{c}{d}_{11}\begin{array}{}\end{array}{d}_{12}\\ {d}_{12}\begin{array}{}\end{array}{d}_{22}\end{array}\right)$, then
To facilitate the expression, we denote $D=\left(\begin{array}{cc}\hfill a\hfill & \hfill b\hfill \\ \hfill b\hfill & \hfill c\hfill \end{array}\right)$, then we obtain
Using central differential discretization, we obtain:
Similarly,
Using central differential discretization, we obtain
Similarly,
Let L_{ ij } denote a central difference approximation to the operator ${\partial}_{{x}_{i}}\left({d}_{ij}{\partial}_{{x}_{j}}\right)$. Then
where m is the dimension of the image. In our case, m = 2.
The discretization of Equation 9 is given by the finite difference scheme:
Represent the whole image of size [M,N] as a vector of size [MN,1]. In this vectormatrix notation and use the semiimplicit discretization, we obtain
Therefore,
Let ${V}^{k}=\left(I+\tau \sum _{i=1}^{m}\sum _{j\ne i}{L}_{ij}^{k}\right){U}^{k}$, and denote $\tau \tau =\frac{\tau}{1+\beta \tau}$, ${W}^{k}=\frac{{V}^{k}+\tau \beta f}{1+\beta \tau}$
Then
It is noted that L_{ ll } is tridiagonal and diagonally dominant, and use AOS scheme [18], we can obtain
AOS scheme is based on the fact that Equation 21 has the same firstorder Taylor expansion in ττ as that of (20). In this way, the complex matrix inverse problem in (20) can be simplified to the matrix inverse in (21). The central difference approximation of L_{ ll } , (l = 1, 2) guarantees that it is diagonally dominant tridiagonal. Therefore, the diffusion equation (21) converts to solving a diagonally dominant tridiagonal system of linear equation, which can be easily solved by Thomas algorithm [19]. By the AOS algorithm, the numerical implementation is 10 times faster than the usual numerical method.
The AOS algorithm of the PDE (9) is given as follows
Input U = U^{k}

1)
Calculate structure tensor J for each point and calculate the corresponding eigenvalues and eigenvectors;

2)
Construct diffusion tensor D using (6) and (7);

3)
Calculate ${V}^{k}={\left(I+\tau \sum _{i=1}^{m}\sum _{j\ne i}{L}_{ij}^{k}\right)}^{{U}^{k}}$;

4)
For l = 1:m
Calculate ${W}_{l}^{k+1}={\left(I\frac{m\tau}{1+\beta \tau}{L}_{ll}^{k}\right)}^{1}\frac{{V}^{k}+\tau \beta f}{1+\beta \tau}$ by Thomas algorithm.
End

5)
Calculate ${U}^{k+1}=\frac{1}{m}\sum _{l=1}^{m}{W}_{l}^{k+1}$
Output U = U^{k+1}
6. Experiments
Selection of parameters is important for the diffusion process and the detailed discussion can be found in [15]. In the following experiments, we choose β = 0.1, c = 0.001, and γ the 90% quantile of the histogram for (μ_{1}μ_{2})^{2}. In the semiimplicit discretization case, the recommendation of time step τ is not more than 5. In the experiments, we set τ = 2.5. The iteration time is related to the spatial scale [15]. In another word, the bigger the iteration time is, the more the diffusion is closer to its steady state.
Parameter T is crucial to switch the two diffusion processes. If T is chosen too small, some narrow long structures cannot be captured precisely. However if T is selected too large, some gradient information may lose and computational cost increases as more pixels are involved in secondorder differential computing. Because setting of T is to recognize the weak edge where the gradient is very small. When T is setting to be x% quantile of the histogram for $\nabla {u}_{\sigma}{}^{2}$, it means that x% of the gradients are smaller than T. The small portion of x% has small gradients that are the potential weak edge and the secondorder directional differential needs to be calculated there. Experiments show that setting T to be 510% quantile of the histogram for $\nabla {u}_{\sigma}{}^{2}$ is sufficient for wide categories of images. In the experiments, we set T to be 10% quantile of $\nabla {u}_{\sigma}{}^{2}$. The noise scale σ and integration scale ρ are given for each case.
We design three groups of experiments as follows:

1)
Complementary diffusion for image coherenceenhancing. The diffusion equation is give by (9).

2)
Weickert's coherenceenhancing diffusion [11]. It corresponds to the case that D ≡ D_{ ρ } .

3)
Isotropic diffusion by PM equation for image enhancement [2]. It corresponds to the case that D is a scalar diffusivity. $D=g(\nabla {u}_{\sigma}{}^{2})=\frac{1}{1+\nabla {u}_{\sigma}{}^{2}/{\lambda}^{2}}$ where λ is the contrast parameter that can be chosen as the 90% quantile of the histogram for $\mid \nabla f\mid $.
The numerical solutions that are implemented by the AOS scheme are described in Section 5. When D is scalar diffusivity, it can be considered as the special case that D is single element matrix. Then $\text{div}(D\nabla u)=\text{div}(g({\left\nabla {u}_{\sigma}\right}^{2})\nabla u)={\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{m}{\partial}_{{x}_{i}}(g({\left\nabla {u}_{\sigma}\right}^{2})}{\partial}_{{x}_{i}}u={\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{m}{L}_{ii}u}$, where L_{ ii } is the central difference approximation to the operator ${\partial}_{{x}_{i}}\left(g\left({\left\nabla {u}_{\sigma}\right}^{2}\right){\partial}_{{x}_{i}}\right)$. In this case, V^{k} = U^{k} .
The experimental results are shown in Figures 2, 3, and 4. The first columns are the original images. The second columns are the results by the proposed complementary diffusion tensordriven approach. The third columns are the results by Weickert's coherencediffusion method. The fourth columns are the results by PMdiffusion equation.
Figure 2 is a noisy tree texture image, where the growth ring is corresponding to ridgelike peaks. From Figure 2b, we can see that the growth ring of tree is preserved precisely and some interrupted line is closed as well. The growth ring in Figure 2b is more straight and smooth than that of Figure 2c. Moreover, the noise is removed better by our approach. Figure 2c shows that the noise is magnified somewhere and some flowlike artifacts appear in the interior area. In Figure 2d, the edge is blurred and the growth ring could not be seen clearly.
Figure 3 is a noisy wood texture image, where texture lines are corresponding to narrow peaks. Figure 3b shows that the important image features as line structures are preserved perfectly whereas Figure 3c severely blurs and twists some lines, and some flowlike artifacts appear in the interior area in Figure 3c. Figure 3d blurs the edge and also could not remove the scattered noise.
Figure 4 is a zebra texture image, where the stripe corresponds to ridgelike structures. Figure 4b precisely preserve these structures while removing the noise and the enhanced stripe is smooth and natural. Figure 4c, however, shows some heterogeneous in the interior of the stripe and deforms the edge in some degree. Figure 4d could not obtain the oriented structure and fails in removing the noise.
Experiments show that by our approach the diffusion is preferred along the desired coherent direction for the image features that are precisely described by the proposed complementary structure tensor. Therefore, important features are preserved and enhanced while the noise is removed very well. However, Weickert's approach deforms some narrow peak and ridgelikeoriented structures because the local average of the firstorder structure tensor cannot recognize these patterns precisely [10]. As to the isotropic diffusion by PM equation, it cannot close the interrupted line structures and also blurs the edge [2]. The proposed switch diffusion is robust and reliable for enhancingoriented structures.
7. Conclusions
In this article, complementary diffusion tensordriven method for image coherence enhancement was proposed. A new structure tensor combing the first and the secondorder directional differential information were proposed, which can capture not only strong edges but also narrow peak and ridgelike structures precisely. The two structure tensors play important roles in different diffusion stage controlled by a switch parameter, which can provide precise coherence estimation on different structures. A complementary diffusion was steered by the diffusion tensor constructed from the new structure tensor, which can preserve many important edges, corners, Tjunctions as well as narrow peaks and ridgelike structures while removing the noise. Furthermore, fast parallel AOS algorithm was applied to numerical implementation that is very efficient. Experiments by our approach were provided and compared with that of other methods, which were very promising. Our approach is reliable and could be applied to oriented structure coherence enhancement.
References
 1.
Weickert J: A Review of Nonlinear Diffusion Filtering. ScaleSpace Theory in Computer Vision. Volume 1252. Springer, Berlin; 1997:328.
 2.
Perona P, Malik J: Scalespace and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Mach Intell 1990,12(7):629639. 10.1109/34.56205
 3.
Alvarez L, Lions PL, Morel JM: Image selective smoothing and edge detection by nonlinear diffusion. II SIAM J Numer Anal 1992, 29: 845866. 10.1137/0729052
 4.
Sapiro G, Tannenbaum A: Affine invariant scalespace. Int J Comput Vis 1993, 11: 2544.
 5.
Rudin L, Osher S, Fatemi E: Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. In Modeliz Mat Traitement d' Images. INRIA; 1992:149179.
 6.
Osher S, Rudin LI: Featureoriented image enhancement using shock filters. SIAM J Numer Anal 1990, 27: 919940. 10.1137/0727053
 7.
Salinas HM, Fernández D Cabrera: Comparison of PDEbased nonlinear diffusion approaches for image enhancement and denoising in optical coherence tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2007,26(6):761771.
 8.
Fang D, Nanning Z, Jianru X: Image smoothing and sharpening based on nonlinear diffusion equation. Signal Process 2008,88(11):28502855. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2008.05.008
 9.
Chen Y, Levine SE: Image recovery via diffusion tensor and timedelay regularization. J Vis Commun Image Rep 2002, 13: 156175. 10.1006/jvci.2001.0497
 10.
Weickert J: Coherenceenhancing diffusion filtering. Int J Comput Vis 1999,31(23):111127.
 11.
Weickert J: Coherenceenhancing diffusion of colour images. Image Vis Comput 1999, (17):201212.
 12.
Bakalexis SA, Boutalis YS, Mertzios BG: Edge detection and image segmentation based on nonlinear anisotropic diffusion. 14th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing 2002 2002, 2: 12031206.
 13.
Cottet GH, Germain L: Image processing through reaction combined with nonlinear diffusion. Math Comput 1993, 61: 659673. 10.1090/S00255718199311954222
 14.
Brox T, Weickert J: In Nonlinear Matrix Diffusion For Optic Flow Estimation. Edited by: Van Gool L. 2002, 446453. DAGM 2002, LNCS 2449
 15.
Weickert J: Nonlinear diffusion filtering. In Handbook on Computer Vision and Applications. Volume 2. Edited by: Jähne B, Haußecker H, Geißler P. Signal Processing and Pattern Recognition; 1999.
 16.
Hongmei Z: Study on medical image segmentation based on variational method. PhD, Xi an JiaoTong University. 2004.
 17.
Kreyszig E: Differential Geometry. Dover Publications; 1991.
 18.
Weickert J, Romeny BM ter Haar, Viergever MA: Efficient and reliable schemes for nonlinear diffusion filtering. IEEE Trans Image Process 1998,7(3):398410. 10.1109/83.661190
 19.
Schwarz HR: Numerische Mathematik. Teubner, Stuttgart, Germany; 1988.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Basic Research Program 973 under Grant Nos. 2010CB732603 and 2011CB707903, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant (No. 60801057).
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Hongmei, Z., Mingxi, W. & Zhengzhong, B. Complementary tensordriven image coherence diffusion for oriented structure enhancement. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2011, 70 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/16876180201170
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Keywords
 tensor driven
 image diffusion
 coherenceenhancing
 structure tensor
 diffusion tensor
 secondorder directional derivative
 AOS scheme