- Open Access
An iterative pilot-data-aided estimator for SFBC relay-assisted OFDM-based systems
© Neves et al; licensee Springer. 2012
- Received: 30 July 2011
- Accepted: 4 April 2012
- Published: 4 April 2012
In this article, we propose and assess an iterative pilot-data-aided channel estimation scheme for space frequency block coding relay-assisted OFDM-based systems. The relay node (RN) employs the equalise-and-forward protocol, and both the base station (BS) and the RN are equipped with antenna arrays, whereas the user terminal (UT) is a single-antenna device. The channel estimation method uses the information carried by pilots and data to improve the estimate of the equivalent channels for the path BS-RN-UT. The mean minimum square error criterion is used in the design of the estimator for both the pilot-based and data-aided iterations. In different scenarios, with only one data iteration, the results show that the proposed scheme requires only half of the pilot density to achieve the same performance of non-data-aided schemes.
Multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO)-based schemes exploit the benefits from the spatial diversity to enhance the link reliability and achieve high throughput. In some situations however, the integration of multiple antenna elements is unpractical especially in mobile terminals due to the size and power constraints. In order to overcome this shortcoming, virtual antenna-array has emerged as a solution to obtain spatial diversity in a distributed approach. The use of dedicated equipment with relaying capabilities rose as a promising technique to expanded coverage, system wide power savings and better immunity against signal fading . The cooperation is enabled by a relaying protocol , e.g., decode-and-forward (DF) when the relay has the capability to regenerate and re-encode the whole frame; amplify-and-forward (AF) where only amplification takes place; and what is designated as equalise-and-forward (EF) [3, 4], where more sophisticated filtering operations are used.
A large number of cooperative techniques have been reported in the literature showing the potential of relay-assisted scenarios. In order to exploit the full potential of cooperative communication, accurate estimates for the different links are required. Although some work has evaluated the impact of the imperfect channel estimation in cooperative schemes [5–10], new techniques have also been proposed that address the specificities of such systems. While with the DF protocol, channel estimation algorithms developed for point-to-point links can be used without modifications, the situation is different when employing AF or techniques performing linear filtering at the relay node (RN). In the later, the overall channel from the base station (BS) to the user terminal (UT) is a composite one with an additional source of noise degrading the performance of point-to-point techniques .
This has motivated research on channel estimation considering AF and different scenarios [12–19]. In , the overall channels are estimated at the UT through classical estimators based on a pre-defined amplifying matrix at the RN. The authors of  proposed a matrix-based algorithm for channel estimation considering an optimisation problem based on the normalised least mean square (NLMS) cost function. In the same way, the authors of  used a similar optimisation problem considering the recursive NLMS. The use of complex polyphase sequences to estimate the channel impulse response (CIR) of the equivalent channel was proposed in . In , the authors presented a tensor-based channel estimation algorithm with an iterative scheme based on the structured least square to refine the initial estimation. Transceiver schemes that jointly design the relay forward matrix and the destination equaliser that minimise the MSE have been proposed in . Concerning the two-way relay, the authors of  proposed an estimator based on new training strategy to jointly estimate the channels and frequency offset. For MIMO relay channels, the linear mean square error (MSE) estimator and optimal training sequences to minimise the MSE are derived in .
The estimation methods of the previously referred work were based on pilots or training sequences. However, the channels present in a cooperative scenario can also be estimated or aided using the energy of the transmitted data [20–23]. In , a recursive channel estimation method based on the channel coder feedback information and linear interpolation is proposed. In  is presented an estimator method that obtain initial estimation based on maximum likelihood and improve it via expectation and maximisation (EM). In , the authors proposed an iterative channel estimator based on the EM algorithm to separately estimate the channels B → R (BS-RN) and R → U (RN-UT), that on the initial phase uses a training sequence and after can use the regenerated data. Although not using directly the regenerated data, in  superposition of pilots and data was considered and based on the non-Gaussian nature of the dual-hop relay link, the authors proposed a first-order autoregressive channel model and derived a Kalman filter-based estimator.
The works discussed above consider only single-antenna network elements (source, relay and destination). However, in several scenarios, namely in the downlink of cellular systems, it is both feasible and beneficial to consider the BS and the RN (if dedicated) with antenna arrays allowing space diversity [3, 4]. In these cases, there is a need for more complex equalisation at the relay since the use of AF limits the exploitation of space diversity provided by the use of multiple antennas. With this scheme, that we term EF, we obtain similarly to the AF protocol, an equivalent channel with additional sources of distortion that requires improved channel estimation schemes. Unlike the AF case, for which several proposals have been published as we pointed out previously, channel estimation schemes that consider the composite channel of EF have not been reported in the literature. This manuscript address this problem and proposes a channel estimation scheme for the space frequency block coding (SFBC) relay-assisted scenario discussed in , where both BS and RN are equipped with an antenna array. This manuscript extends the work in [24, 25] by providing detailed derivations, considering additional scenarios and, unlike , using the information of the regenerated data to improve the channel estimates. The estimation method at the UT consists of two iterations; in the first one, only pilots are used to estimate the channels and the results are used to perform a first decision on the data symbol. Then, in the next iteration, these symbols are used as virtual pilots to improve the channel estimates to be used in the final symbol decision. The MMSE criterion is used in the design of the estimator for both the pilot-based and data-aided iterations. The results are compared against the pilot-based estimation scheme presented in  and they show that, for the same pilot density, the MSE reduces or, alternatively, fewer pilots are needed to achieve the same performance. Therefore, the system's spectral efficiency is improved with only one data iteration.
The remainder of this article is organised as follows. We present in Section 2 the system model and the mathematical description involving the cooperative transmission. In Section 3, we present the proposed estimator scheme. The results in terms of normalised MSE are presented in Section 4. Finally, the main conclusions are outlined in Section 5.
The indices and denote time and frequency domain variables, respectively. is the statistical expectation operator, , and are the pointwise, transpose and conjugate operations, respectively. stands for a diagonal matrix and denotes the Fourier transform operation. Variables, vectors or matrices in time domain (TD) are denoted by . All estimates are denoted by .
2.1. Channel model
where is the instant when the CIR is evaluated, is total number of paths, and are the complex amplitude and delay of the path . is modelled as a zero mean complex Gaussian variable with variance determined by the power delay profile and satisfying . Although the channel is time-variant we assume it quasi-static, i.e. constant during one OFDM symbol interval. In the frequency domain, the channel gains, , are therefore also zero mean complex Gaussian variables with unit variance. It is widely known that in typical OFDM systems the subcarrier separation is significantly lower than the coherence bandwidth of the channel. Accordingly, the fading in two adjacent subcarriers can be considered flat and without loss of generality we can assume for generic channel . We also assume .
2.2. Relay-assisted (RA)/cooperative scheme
Two transmit antenna SFBC mapping
We assume a half-duplex EF relaying protocol which requires two phases. In phase I, the encoded data , with unit variance, are transmitted through the direct link to the UT and the link B → R to the RN. At the RN, linear operations that perform the Alamouti decoding and re-encode the soft estimates using the same scheme are performed. It should be emphasised that when the RN is equipped with an antenna array the AF protocol is not the best strategy  since it would not allow getting benefits of the space diversity provided by the use of multiple antennas. In such case, and assuming Rayleigh fading, for each data symbol the equivalent channel from source to one antenna element of the relay is the sum of two complex Gaussian random variables. Therefore, a system asymptotically achieves the same diversity as a . Consequently, we need to perform an equalisation to decode and combine the received signals on each antenna before Alamouti re-encoding at the RN. However, in the considered protocol, no hard decision is performed at the RN, this fact being the reason to refer it as EF.
representing the noise term that is transmitted by the RN.
with being the variance of the total noise at the input of the RN.
The data symbols are obtained after performing the joint processing which corresponds to combining the soft-decision variables received in both phases of the protocol, i.e. via the direct and the cooperative links.
At the BS, the pilots are considered unitary in all positions, i.e. . At the RN, the same pilot positions are filled. According to Equations (4) and (5), in order to perform optimal equalisation, we need to estimate at the receiver and using will no longer provide the required channels estimates. Therefore, at the RN the pilot positions are filled with .
The superscript indicates in which iteration the estimate is obtained. are the binary decoded data, represents the data symbols that are obtained after the re-modulation and corresponds to the channels estimates. The channels estimates are obtained using only pilot information, whereas for the data regenerated in iteration 1 is used to improve the estimates. In the second iteration, the pilot-data-based estimates are used to perform the SFBC de-mapping and the output is then fed to the Joint Processing block to produce the final data estimates.
3.1. Pilot-based estimation
3.1.1. The TD-MMSE estimator
The initial estimation is obtained via pilots and it is accomplished according to the pilot-based Time Domain Mean Minimum Square Error (TD-MMSE) estimator . This method performs in TD the optimal estimation, i.e. the LS estimation and MMSE filtering. The operation in time domain leads to a significant complexity reduction relatively to the conventional frequency domain processing because the MMSE filter corresponds to a sparse diagonal matrix, as was extensively discussed in .
where is the noise with noise variance .
The two previous equations may be simultaneously implemented in order to minimise the estimator complexity, thus the final CIR estimate presents non-null elements and zeros in the remaining .
where corresponds to the complex white Gaussian noise.
Convolving the expression in (11) with the pilots symbols we obtain the expression in (7). This convolution corresponds to multiply the subcarriers at frequency by 1. By design, these are the positions reserved to the pilots thus the data component vanishes.
3.2. TD-MMSE estimator for the equivalent channel
- (1)Pilots with some fluctuation in amplitude:
■ As the amplitude of the pilots at the destination is not constant and equal to one, the result of the estimation is a spread of the replicas of the CIR.
- (2)Decreasing the amplitude of the pilots
■ The SNR of the pilots is decreased as well.
In order to quantify how the effects (1) and (2) can degrade the TD-MMSE estimator performance, we have evaluated the impact of both of them, separately, in a SISO system, i.e. , since the compound equivalent channels B → R → U correspond to point-to-point links.
To evaluate the effect of the amplitude fluctuation, we considered that the pilots (originally with unit amplitude) had their amplitude disturbed by a random Gaussian variable with zero mean and variance equal to , where quantifies how far would be from the pilots with unitary amplitude.
According to Figure 6, channel model A does not show any difference in performance when the transmitted pilots are . We point out that channel ITU pedestrian model B is more selective than model A and because of that it presents only 0.2 dB of penalty for low values of , i.e. when the transmitted pilots are .
The results in both figures show a constant shift in the MSE value when the amplitude of the pilots is not unitary. The shift present in all results is not a real degradation. It is caused by the normalisation present in the MSE in (13). In fact, assuming an MSE without normalisation the results are all the same. Transmitting as pilots, i.e. pilots with constant and non-unitary amplitude, does not bring any noticeable degradation in the TD-MMSE performance comparing to transmitting unitary pilots.
The major degradation occurs only when the pilots have some fluctuation in amplitude and solely for low values of in highly selective channels.
The previous results evaluated the effect of the pilot amplitude fluctuations and reduction assuming that the estimator used is the one designed for the conventional point-to-point links, i.e. the TD-MMSE coefficients are the ones obtained with the correlation statistics of (9). Nevertheless, according to our cooperative scheme, we need to estimate the equivalent channel and its correlation matrix to use the optimum TD-MMSE design. The correlation matrix is defined by where the filter input-output cross-correlation, termed , is given by , where both and are matrices.
According to the MSE results in Figures 6 and 7, transmitting the factor brings, in the worst case, 0.2 dB of degradation and from the results of Figure 9 the correlation matrix of the equivalent channel has negligible values out of the diagonal elements and therefore there is no need to increase the system complexity by implementing the filter given by (14). Therefore, our cooperative scheme tolerates the use of the TD-MMSE estimator without compromising its estimate. The analysis can be applied to any other channel without loss of generality. However, in terms of the overall system performance, better results are expected for less selective channels.
3.3. Data-based channel estimation
In an OFDM system, the signal received at the destination is , where is a vector representing the diagonal of the channel matrix and represents the additive Gaussian noise. In our cooperative system, during phase II follows (2) and is replaced by , where and are the diagonals of the matrices that represent the channel frequency responses (CFRs) of the channels between RN and UT.
According to Equations (2)-(4), the extra sources of distortion imply that the accuracy of the initial estimates present some penalties relatively to the case of a point-to-point link. Therefore, in order to improve their accuracies a data-based LS estimation is carried out using the virtual pilots, i.e. the regenerated data symbols .
where , and follows (2).
It is important to note that although we have two subcarriers, we obtain a single estimate for each antenna, i.e. if there was no noise, we would obtain the average of the equivalent channels in subcarriers and .
where is the size of the data subcarriers set.
where SNR is the signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio assuming that the noise power per subcarrier is and the average received signal power (including pilots) is normalised to 1, i.e. . Equation (19) shows that even for a moderate probability of symbol error (e.g. ) the increase is quite small. Therefore, we can anticipate that even with first data iteration being very inaccurate still there is potential for improving the channel estimates using data.
3.4. Complexity analysis of the data-aided estimation
The computational complexity of the data-aided iteration is related to the SFBC-decoding and the LS estimation. The merge of both operations requires multiplications and additions per OFDM symbol whereas, according to , the pilot-based iteration requires multiplications and additions per OFDM symbol, as well. By analysing only the number of multiplications we found that, despite the effective gains in terms of MSE performance or spectral efficiency, the complexity of the data-aided estimator is about twice of the pilot-based scheme.
4.1. Simulation parameters
In order to evaluate the performance of the presented channel estimation method, we considered the scenario described in Section 2.2 and in the simulation we used the ITU pedestrian channel models A and B  at a speed of . The number of subcarriers set to 1,024 and modulation is QPSK. The transmitted OFDM symbol carried pilot and data subcarriers with a pilot separation . We used the same pilot pattern at the BS and RN and since they were double antenna arrays we allocated different set of pilot subcarriers to perform the estimation. Hence for both the BS and RN, the pilot subcarriers were spaced by for each antenna. Since BS and RN are both equipped with an antenna array the resulting MSE of the direct channels B → U (DL) and the relay channels R → U (RL) are obtained by averaging the individuals MSEs.
The simulations were performed assuming uncorrelated antenna channels, the receiver was perfectly synchronised and the insertion of a long enough cyclic prefix in the transmitter ensured that the orthogonality of the subcarriers is maintained after transmission.
4.2. MSE channel estimation performance
Figures 12 and 13 present the results relative to Scenario # 2, for channel models A and B, respectively. In both cases, the pilot-based estimates of the RL and DL present approximately the same performance. This is due to the fact that in the case that the links between BS and RNs are highly reliable, most of the data information is successfully detected at the RN, which has a positive impact on the relays links. We can observe that the proposed pilot-data estimator for achieves approximately the same performance of the pilot-based one for ; therefore, requiring only 1/4 of the pilot subcarriers used by the pilot-based method.
Figures 14 and 15 present the results relative to Scenario # 3 for channel models A and B, respectively. These results show that in such scenario both links B → R and R → U have higher quality conditions over the direct one. In this case, the noise variances have a minor effect on the pilot-based estimates and due that the RL performance overreaches the DL one. The proposed scheme nevertheless can improve the RL performance. For , the proposed estimator presents a performance close to the pilot-data performance considering only 1/2 of the pilots used by the pilot-based estimator, i.e. . In this scenario, the MSE of the pilot-data-based estimator for a given is quite close to the one achieved considering the pilot-based estimator with pilot separation of .
We proposed a pilot-data-based estimation algorithm for an OFDM-based cooperative scenario where spatial diversity provided by SFBC is complemented with the use of a half-duplex RN using the EF protocol. The proposed method consists of two iterations and uses the MMSE criterion to design the estimator for both the pilot-based and data-aided iterations. The data-aided estimation component is carried out using the regenerated data symbols as virtual pilots. In different scenarios, the results have shown that for the same pilot density the MSE is reduced approximately by 3 dB or alternatively requires half of pilot density to achieve the same performance therefore improving the overall system spectral efficiency with only one data iteration.
It is clear from the presented results that the proposed pilot-data-based method has significant interest for application in next generation wireless networks for which cooperation is anticipated.
Throughout this section, we use the following definitions:
The received power is given by
The power at the pilot subcarriers is
The noise variance per subcarriers is represented by and therefore the total power is given by .
If there is any distinction among pilot and data subcarriers the SNR is
If and the SNR is given by .
where and are the transmitted and the regenerated data, respectively, and for QPSK and .
Since our scenario is a cooperative and the LS data estimation is used to estimate the channels R → U which is , we need provide expression for the squared norm of the error in this case as well.
The authors acknowledge the support of the European project CODIV--FP7/ICT/2007/215477, the Portuguese projects CADWIN--PTDC/EEA-TEL/099241/2008 and CROWN--PTDC/EEA-TEL/115828/2009, and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) grant for D. Neves.
- Liu KJR, Sadek AK, Su W, Kwasinski A: Cooperative Communications and Networking. Cambridge University Press, New York; 2008.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Laneman JN, Tse DNC, Wornell GW: Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: efficient protocols and outage behaviour. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 2004, 50(12):3062-3080. 10.1109/TIT.2004.838089MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
- Teodoro S, Silva A, Gil JM, Gameiro A: Virtual MIMO schemes for downlink space-frequency coding OFDM systems. IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communication, 2009. PIMRC'09, Tokyo 2009, 1322-1326.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moço A, Teodoro S, Silva A, Gameiro A: Single and multiple antenna relay-assisted techniques for uplink and downlink OFDM systems. Int J Adv Syst Meas 2010, 3(2):22-34.Google Scholar
- Muhaidat H, Uysal M, Adve R: Pilot-symbol-assisted detection scheme for distributed orthogonal space-time block coding. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2009, 3(3):1057-1061.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gedik B, Uysal M: Impact of imperfect channel estimation on the performance of amplify-and-forward relaying. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2009, 8(3):1468-1479.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ikki SS, Feteiha M, Uysal M: Performance analysis of cooperative diversity networks with imperfect channel estimation over Rician fading channels. IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2009. ICC'09, Cape Town 2010, 160-165.Google Scholar
- Han S, Ahn S, Oh E, Hong D: Effect of channel-estimation error on BER performance in cooperative transmission. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2009, 58(4):2083-2088.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Amin O, Ikki SS, Uysal M: On the performance analysis of multiple-relay cooperative diversity systems with channel estimation errors. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2011, 60(5):2050-2059.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choi J: MMSE-based distributed beamforming in cooperative relay networks. IEEE Trans Commun 2011, 59(5):1346-1356.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neves D, Ribeiro C, Silva A, Gameiro A: Channel estimation schemes for OFDM relay-assisted systems. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Spring, 2009.VTC'09-SPRING, Barcelona 2009, 1-5.Google Scholar
- Ma J, Orlik P, Zhang J, Li GY: Pilot matrix design for estimating cascaded channels in two-hop MIMO amplify-and-forward relay systems. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2011, 10(6):1946-1965.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang T, de Lamare RC, Mitchell PD: BEACON channel estimation for cooperative wireless sensor networks based on data selection. IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Systems, 2010. ISWS'10, York 2010, 140-144.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang T, de Lamare RC, Mitchell PD: Low-complexity set-membership channel estimation for cooperative wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 2011, 60(6):2594-2607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tu J, Cai Y: Time-domain channel estimation for amplify-and-forward relay in OFDM systems. IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communication and Signal Processing, 2010. ICWCSP'10, Suzhou 2010, 1-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roemer F, Haardt M: Tensor-based channel estimation and iterative refinements for two-way relaying with multiple antennas and spatial reuse. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2010, 58(11):5720-5735.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xing C, Ma S, Wu YC, Ng TS: Transceiver design for dual-hop non-regenerative MIMO-OFDM relay systems under channel uncertainties. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2011, 58(12):6325-6339.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang G, Gao F, Tellambura C: Superimposed pilots aided joint CFO and channel estimation for ZP-OFDM modulated two-way. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Fall, 2010. VTC'10-FALL, Ottawa 2010, 1-5.Google Scholar
- Pang J, Shen G, Wang D, Jiang L, Wang W: Channel estimation and optimal training design for amplify and forward MIMO relay channel under spatial fading correlation. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Fall, 2010. VTC'10-FALL, Ottawa 2010, 1-5.Google Scholar
- Song M, Kim D, Im G: Recursive channel estimation method for OFDM-BASED cooperative systems. IEEE Commun Lett 2010, 14(11):1029-1031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aerts N, Avram I, Duyck D, Moeneclaey M: EM based channel estimation in an amplify-and-forward relaying network. IEEE Proceeding on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2010. PIRMC'10, Istanbul 2010, 724-729.Google Scholar
- Sheu JS, Sheen WH: An EM algorithm-based channel estimation for OFDM amplify-and-forward relaying systems. IEEE International Conference on Communication, 2010. ICC'10, Cape Town 2010, 1-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou X, Lamahewa TA, Sadeghi P: Kalman filter-based channel estimation for amplify and forward relay communications. IEEE Asilomar Conference Signals Systems and Computers, 2009. ACSSC'09, Pacific Grove 2009, 1498-1502.Google Scholar
- Neves D, Ribeiro C, Silva A, Gameiro A: A pilot-data based channel estimation method for OFDM relay-assisted systems. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Fall, 2011. VTC'11-Fall, San Francisco 2011, 1-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neves D, Ribeiro C, Silva A, Gameiro A: A time domain channel estimation scheme for equalize-and-forward relay-assisted systems. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Fall, 2010. VTC'10-FALL, Ottawa 2010, 1-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ribeiro C, Gameiro A: An OFDM symbol design for reduced complexity MMSE channel estimation. J Commun 2008, 3(4):26-33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- 3GPP TS 36.201 V8.1.0: 3rd "Generation Partnership Project", Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA), LTE Physical Layer - General Description. 2007.Google Scholar
- Vielmon A, Li Y, Barry J: Performance of Alamouti transmit diversity over time-varying rayleigh-fading channels. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2004, 3(55):1369-1373.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.