Skip to content


  • Editorial
  • Open Access


  • 1Email author,
  • 2 and
  • 3
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing20122012:90

  • Received: 19 March 2012
  • Accepted: 26 April 2012
  • Published:

Over the last three decades, there has been increasing interest in exploiting sparseness constraints in signal processing, that is, searching for target signals with as few non-zero entries as possible. This approach was, perhaps, first exploited in the modelling of excitation signals in speech processing or reflectivity sequences in seismic deconvolution with only a small number of non-zero values. Some 30 years later, the associated mathematical methods and application domains, both for single- and multiple-dimensional signals, have evolved to a point where sparse signal processing has become an area of study in its own right.

This special issue on sparse signal processing, therefore, begins with a review article by Marvasti et al. [1], entitled A unified approach to sparse signal processing which provides a tutorial review of sparse signal recovery using various techniques with minimal sampling measurements, in effect, compressed sampling, and also describes applications of sparsity in a number of other challenging domains. Many of the articles in this special issue are related to applications of sparse signal processing.

The next set of articles provides examples of where sparsity can be exploited in parameter estimation problems. The article by Djafari [2] uses a Bayesian inference approach to address both signal and image inversion problems wherein sparsity is considered either in the original or transformed signal space. Taxonomy of prior models is provided for the related probabilistic frameworks, and associated estimation algorithms are developed.

Angelosante and Giannakis [3], in an invited article, consider the problem of estimating the parameters of time-varying autoregressive models. They overcome the lack of continuity and high computational complexity in working with high-dimensional datasets by casting their problem as a sparse regression with grouped variables. This is then solved with a group least-absolute shrinkage and selection operator, denoted Lasso. Numerical evaluations are employed to demonstrate the merits of the approach.

Zhu et al [4]. also examine a parameter estimation problem in the context of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR). They address a difficult nonlinear problem by employing linearization and an over-complete dictionary. This is motivated by the sparse distribution in the observation space of SAR micromotion targets. A variational approximation framework is also exploited for Bayesian computation, and numerical simulations confirm the higher resolution achievable by the proposed approach over conventional methods.

Xie et al. [5] provide a hybrid approach for 2D direction-of-arrival estimation in the presence of mutual coupling across the array. They employ a manifold decomposition approach for the case when the number of sensors is sparse, smaller than required in traditional beamspace-based algorithms. In particular, an algorithm to estimate azimuth angle without exact knowledge of the mutual coupling is provided.

Blanco and Nájar [6] propose an algorithm for estimating the angles of arrival of multiple uncorrelated sources impinging upon a uniform linear array. They use an overcomplete dictionary representation of the spatial covariance matrix model. A sparsity penalty is applied and a least angle regression/homotopic approach is used to solve the resulting objective function. Their approach is shown to achieve high resolution with the advantage of low computational cost.

Li et al. [7] focus upon source localization with a single snapshot and improve the efficiency of an iterative adaptive approach by utilizing the optimal filter only on the spatial components corresponding to the impinging angles of the sources. Their evaluations confirm that this simplification attains comparable accuracy of source angle and power estimation with a substantial reduction in computational load.

Sahnoun et al. [8] address multi-dimensional modal estimation using sparse estimation techniques in combination with an efficient multigrid approach. To overcome huge size in the necessary dictionaries, they refine their dictionaries over several levels of resolution. Their sparse modal method is shown to enhance greatly the estimation accuracy for noisy signals and to yield good robustness to the choice of the number of components.

The next set of articles includes works on dictionary learning and provides both practical approaches and new theoretical results. Huang et al. [9] consider adaptive matching pursuit to find atoms used in the context of dictionary learning. They apply a total least squares constraint in the learning and concentrate upon obtaining a better match between the grid, and the ensuing dictionary, and the available measurements.

Zheng et al. [10] provide an algorithm for sparse signal recovery based on exploiting the relationship between the noise subspace and an overcomplete basis matrix representation. Their approach has the advantage that not only it can enhance the sparseness of the solution, but also can reduce the number of required data snapshots and the signal-to-noise ratio for stable recovery.

Wang et al. [11] also study sparse signal reconstruction and propose the restricted isometry property for the orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm. Their bound is found to be close to that previously conjectured by researchers in the field.

The final set of articles includes works which show where sparsity can be exploited in various application domains: communications, image & video processing, and radar.

Pakrooh et al. [12] investigate the problem of deterministic pilot allocation in Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing systems. They propose a method based on the minimization of a coherence measure of the submatrix of the unitary discrete Fourier transform matrix associated with the pilot subcarriers and propose strategies for carrier placement based on cyclic difference sets. They also consider orthogonal matching pursuit and an Iterative Method with Adaptive Thresholding for channel estimation.

Lagunas and Nájar [13] consider spectrum sensing for cognitive radio. They use a feature-based approach based on periodic non-uniform sampling. A correlation-matching procedure is proposed to detect predetermined spectral shapes in sparse wideband regimes.

Sermwuthisarn et al. [14] address sparse signal reconstruction from a compressed measurement image corrupted by impulsive noise. An octave-tree discrete wavelet transform is employed to induce sparsity within the image signal. The energy distribution of the reconstructed sparse signal is then used to perform noise removal, and the noise-corrupted coefficients are finally estimated to yield the reconstructed signal.

The article by Zamani et al. [15] is set in the context of magnetic resonance imaging and proposes the use of certain sampling strategies to increase the speed of cardiac cine visualization. Fuzzy c-means clustering is used to cluster statistical features extracted from the temporal-spatial data, and hidden Markov models are also used for modelling. The authors achieve a doubling in speed over current methods.

Liu et al. [16] undertake a study in sparse signal processing for ballistic missile warning radar, and assume the radar return is sparse. A sparse dictionary is developed which is parameterized by the unknown precession frequency used in modelling a conical missile during flight. The precession frequency and the scattering centres of the missile are then estimated through nonlinear least squares and an orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm.

We wish to acknowledge all the reviewers who have helped considerably to improve the quality of this special issue. Special thanks must also be expressed for the support from Dr Arash Amini and Professor Bulent Sankur; together with that provided by Christopher Sy at the Journal Editorial Office. Finally, the Lead Editor, Farokh Marvasti, wishes to thank Prof Izzat Dawazah for providing the opportunity for him to spend a period of sabbatical leave at University College London.


Authors’ Affiliations

Advanced Communications Research Institute, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Laboratoire des Signaux et Systemes (L2S), CNRS-SUPELEC UNIV PARIS SUD, Orsay, France
Communications Division, School of Electronic, Electrical and Systems Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK


  1. Marvasti Farokh, Amini Arash, Haddadi Farzan, Soltanolkotabi Mehdi, Khalaj Babak, Aldroubi Akram, Sanei Saeid, Chambers Jonathon: A unified approach to sparse signal processing. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2012, 2012: 44. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-44View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mohammad-Djafari Ali: Bayesian approach with prior models which enforce sparsity in signal and image processing. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2012 2012, 52. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-52Google Scholar
  3. Angelosante Daniele, Giannakis GeorgiosB: Group lassoing change-points in piecewise-constant AR. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2012, 2012: 70. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-70View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhu Sha, Mohammad-Djafari Ali, Wang Hongqiang, Deng Bin, Li Xiang, Mao Junjie: Parameter estimation for SAR micromotion target based on sparse signal representation. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2012, 2012: 13. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-13View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Xie Julan, He Zishu, Li Huiyong, Li Jun: 2D DOA estimation with sparse uniform circular arrays in the presence of mutual coupling. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2011, 2011: 127. 10.1186/1687-6180-2011-127View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanco Luis, Najar Montse: Sparse covariance fitting for direction of arrival estimation. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, in press.Google Scholar
  7. Li Gang, Zhang Hao, Wang Xiqin, Xia Xiang-Gen: An efficient implementation of iterative adaptive approach for source localization. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2012, 2012: 7. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Sahnoun Souleymen, Djermoune El-Hadi, Soussen Charles, Brie David: Sparse multidimensional modal analysis using a multigrid dictionary refinement. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2012, 2012: 60. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-60View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang Tianyao, Liu Yimin, Meng Huadong, Wang Xiqin: Adaptive matching pursuit with constrained total least squares. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2012, 2012: 76. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-76View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Zheng Chundi, Li Gang, Liu Yimin, Wang Xiqin: Subspace Weighted L2,1 Minimization for Sparse Signal Recovery. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, in press.Google Scholar
  11. Wang Jian, Kwon Seokbeop, Shim Byonghyo: Near optimal bound of orthogonal matching pursuit using restricted isometric constant. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2012, 2012: 8. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Pakrooh Pooria, Amini Arash, Marvasti Farokh: OFDM pilot allocation for sparse channel estimation. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2012, 2012: 59. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-59View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lagunas Eva, Najar Montse: Sparse correlation matching-based spectrum sensing for open spectrum communications. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2012, 2012: 31. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-31View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Sermwuthisarn Parichat, Gansawat Duangrat, Patanavijit Vorapoj, Auethavekiat Supatana: Impulsive noise rejection method for compressed measurement signal in compressed sensing. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2012, 2012: 68. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-68View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Zamani Pooria, Kayvanrad Mohammad, Soltanian-Zadeh Hamid: Using learned under-sampling pattern for increasing speed of cardiac cine MRI based on compressive sensing principles. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2012, 2012: 82. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-82View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu Lihua, Du Xiaoyong, Ghogho Mounir, Hu Weidong, McLernon Des: Precession missile feature extraction using sparse component analysis of radar measurements. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2012, 2012: 24. 10.1186/1687-6180-2012-24View ArticleGoogle Scholar