 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Contender waveforms for LowPower WideArea networks in a scheduled 4G OFDM framework
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing volume 2018, Article number: 43 (2018)
Abstract
When designing new solutions for LowPower WideArea (LPWA) networks, coexistence and integration into existing 4G frameworks should be considered to ease the deployment procedure and reduce costs. In a previous work, TurboFSK was proposed as a potential physical layer for LPWA networks. With its constant envelope and high energy efficiency, the scheme is a serious contender for this type of networks. We propose to study the system in the Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) framework, currently used by existing cellular networks and also considered for the recently standardized NarrowBand IoT (NBIoT). Several extensions of the TurboFSK scheme are presented. A hybrid modulation alphabet, combining orthogonal with linear modulations, is introduced, and the substitution of Frequency Shift Keying (FSK) modulation for another orthogonal modulation based on ZadoffChu (ZC) sequences is considered. Simulations are run under various conditions including Rayleigh fading channel with mobility, demonstrating that the TurboFSK scheme is able to achieve performance close to the Turbo Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (TCOFDM) when a low rate is considered. When considering hybridation of the alphabet, limitations appear for higher data rate, which can be overcome by changing the orthogonal alphabet. The study of the variation of the envelope of the compared solutions emphasizes the crucial tradeoff between performance and efficiency of the power amplifier (PA), a main concern for lowpower applications. While using the proposed solutions, we demonstrate that energy consumption can be reduced by up to a factor of 2.5.
Introduction
The Internet of Things (IoT) is expected to interconnect objects using both existing communication technologies and new emerging technologies [1, 2]. These new technologies should be designed in a way that facilitates integration to existing frameworks, e.g, the Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) framework used in LongTerm Evolution (LTE) systems (4G). The framework defines the structure of the signal and the overall parameters of the physical waveforms. By considering an existing framework, deployment costs are reduced and coexistence between various technologies is facilitated.
LowPower WideArea (LPWA) networks [3, 4] are part of the IoT and 5G context and are predicted to approximately represent 10% of the overall IoT connections [5]. Requirements for LPWA include longrange communication and lowenergy consumption at the device level. Long range can be achieved by ensuring a very low level of sensitivity at the receiver, which can be obtained by allowing the Quality of Service (QoS) to be achieved for low levels of SignaltoNoise Ratio (SNR) [6]. The lowenergy consumption requirement results from the necessity to have a long battery life for the devices (up to 10 years). Regarding the physical layer, saving energy is usually done by selecting an energyefficient modulation or by considering lowcomplexity operations for data transmissions (thus reducing the consumption of the processing unit). It is also achieved by ensuring a high efficiency for the power amplifier (PA), which is the most powerconsuming component of the transmission chain [7–9]. The efficiency of the PA is highly dependent on the peak power of the signal [10]. Constant envelope modulations are thus of prime importance, as they allow for large PA efficiency gains.
NarrowBand IoT (NBIoT) is a solution partly dedicated to LPWA networks and was introduced in the LTE release 13 [11–14]. The uplink transmission of this solution combines [13 15] Turbo Code (TC) [11, 15] as forward error correction (FEC) and a repetition factor. It guarantees the QoS to be reached for very low levels of SNR, i.e., low levels of sensitivity are obtained. The solution is highly energy efficient and offers a large range of data rates, making it suitable to numerous applications. A solution relying on a turbo receiver, the TurboFSK, was introduced in previous literature [6]. It allows for very low levels of sensitivity to be achieved thanks to the use of a combination of orthogonal modulation, a convolutional code, and an iterative receiver. Additionally, the scheme employs a constant envelope modulation, the Frequency Shift Keying (FSK) modulation, potentially increasing the efficiency of the PA.
If the TurboFSK scheme can be easily integrated in an OFDM framework thanks to its use of the FSK (which can be implemented using the fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm), it nonetheless lacks the flexibility offered by the NBIoT solution. An interesting option is therefore to associate this technique with alphabet hybridation [16–19], which will improve the flexibility of the scheme. This hybridation of the FSK modulation, socalled Coplanar FSK [20], can be done while maintaining the constant envelope property, which gives a significant advantage to the TurboFSK technique. Additionally, the absence of constraints on the choice of the orthogonal alphabet for TurboFSK enables the design of alternative solutions relying on different modulations. For example, the chirp modulation [21] gained significant interest in recent years [22], particularly with LPWA industrial solution LoRa [23–25]. The alphabet of this orthogonal modulation is constructed from a chirp base, which can be, for example, selected as a ZadoffChu (ZC) sequence [26], a Constant Amplitude Zero AutoCorrelation (CAZAC) sequence notably used for the primary synchronization signal in the LTE protocol [11]. A possible alternative to TurboFSK can thus be the TurboZC scheme, where a chirp modulation is used instead of the FSK modulation.
There are three main objectives and contributions for this work: present the possibility to integrate the TurboFSK in an OFDM framework, confront the scheme to more practical scenarios, and study the potential of the extensions of the scheme. Regarding the first objective, a thorough description of the OFDM framework is proposed, and equations of the several receivers are derived for the specific architecture. For the second objective, several transmission channels are considered: an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel, a static Rayleigh fading channel, and a Rayleigh fading channel with mobility. Finally, regarding the third objective, two variations of the initial TurboFSK scheme are considered: Coplanar TurboFSK, which relies on a hybrid FSK and Phase Shift Keying (PSK) alphabet, and TurboZC (and Coplanar TurboZC), which uses an orthogonal alphabet constructed from ZC sequences. For all the comparisons, two scenarios with two different data rates are considered. Three other schemes, based on the [13 15] TC, are used for comparisons: Turbo Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (TCOFDM), Turbo Coded Single Carrier Frequency Division Multiple Access (TCSCFDMA), and Turbo Coded Frequency Shift Keying (TCFSK). The first two schemes are directly derived from the NBIoT solution, while the third one enables a comparison of TurboFSK with another turbo coded constant envelope waveform.
The paper is organized as follows. The system model, including the OFDM framework and the five compared solutions, is presented in Section 2. Performance are compared in Section 3, and Section 4 concludes the paper.
System model
This section is dedicated to the presentation of the general OFDM framework and of the various techniques that are evaluated and compared.
OFDM framework
The general principle of the OFDM framework is to construct the signal in the frequency domain. Over the N_{FFT} available carrier frequencies, only N_{A} are considered to transmit information. This is a form of multicarrier modulation. The sequence generation in the OFDM framework, i.e., the transmitter architecture, and the considered channel are described first. Then, assuming a generic form for the transmitted sequence, the mathematical derivations of the likelihood of a sequence are computed. The result will be used in the next sections to derive the probabilistic receiver of the considered schemes. The generic architecture of the OFDM framework is finally presented, along with the values of the parameters considered for the simulations.
Transmitter
The OFDM framework is depicted in Fig. 1. From the information packet of size Q bits, a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) is computed and appended to the information block. Encoding and modulation steps are then performed. These steps depend on the choice of the technique and are presented later. The output of this block is represented by a matrix of size N_{A}×N_{s}, where N_{A} is the number of active frequencies and N_{s} the number of time slots (or OFDM symbols). This is the timefrequency allocation which is then included in the FFT grid of size N_{FFT}×N_{s}. Inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) of size N_{FFT} is then applied to convert the frequency signal into a time signal consisting of N_{FFT}×N_{s} samples (or chips). The inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) algorithm is used in practice to perform the IDFT. Considering the vector X of length N_{FFT}, the discretetime sequence of the considered OFDM symbol x is given by
which is the IDFT of the vector X, with k ∈ {0,…,N_{FFT}−1}. A cyclic prefix (CP) of length N_{CP} consisting of the last N_{CP} samples of each OFDM symbol is then inserted at the beginning of each symbol.
Channel
The emitted signal then transits through the channel. The use of a CP allows the effect of the channel to be expressed by a circular convolution when the channel delay spread is smaller than the size of the CP. Multipath channel is modelled by a discretetime domain representation, i.e., a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, applied at chiptime. The useful signal (after removing the CP) at index k is given by
where h is the channel impulse response, a complex vector with L_{ch} elements, representing the gain of each possible paths. The elements ν_{k} of the noise vector ν are independent and follow a circularly symmetric and zero mean complex normal distribution with variance \(\sigma _{\text {ch}}^{2}\). The circular convolution assumption can only be considered if N_{CP}≥L_{ch}, i.e., if the delays of the previous OFDM symbols only affect the CP of the current symbol and not its useful part.
Likelihood computation
In order to derive the probabilistic receiver for each technique, we would like to express the likelihood of observing a sequence y given that a sequence x was transmitted. A generic form for the transmitted sequence is considered, and further simplifications will occur when specific modulation techniques are considered. The likelihood of observing a sequence y given that a sequence x was transmitted is given by
As normal distribution with variance \(\sigma _{\text {ch}}^{2}\) was assumed, the likelihood is expressed
where C_{st} is a term independent of x and 〈·,·〉 is the scalar product operator.
Using (1) in (4), the likelihood can be expressed with
where Y(n) (resp. H(n)) is the nth dimension of the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of size N_{FFT} of the vector y (resp. h) and \(\overline {X}\) is the complex conjugate of X.
As the form of x was purposely kept general, additional computations are required to obtain the final expression of the maximum likelihood (ML) decoder. However, the expression demonstrates the necessity for the receiver to evaluate the DFT of the received timevector y denoted by Y and to have knowledge of H, the DFT of the channel coefficients.
The log likelihood ratio (LLR) of the bit b_{m} is given by
where \(\mathcal {X}^{m}_{+1} \left (\text {resp}. \mathcal {X}^{m}_{1}\right)\) the group of sequences x which encode an information word for which the bit b_{m} is equal to + 1 (resp. − 1). The LLR of the bits for each technique will be computed using the specific expression of the sequence x in (5) and (6).
Receiver
In order to retrieve the information that was mapped in the frequency domain at the transmitter side, a DFT of size N_{FFT} is applied on each OFDM symbol, using the FFT algorithm. The result is the vector Y, the channel observation. By selecting only the N_{A} used frequencies, the N_{s} vectors of size N_{A} transmitted at the first place are retrieved. This signal is fed to the demodulator/decoder along with H. This vector can also be interpreted as the complex gain on each frequency. Using the channel observation and the vector H, the block demodulator uses a simplified formulation of (5) to compute the LLR of the transmitted bits. The information bits are finally estimated by the decoder and the CRC is computed to evaluate if the packet contains any error.
TCOFDM and TCSCFDMA
Two wellknown techniques are considered for comparison: the use of OFDM associated with the [13 15] TC [27] and the TCSCFDMA, for which a precoding based on a DFT transform is applied. These schemes are multiplexing techniques, i.e., a Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK) symbol is mapped on each frequency carrier. For both techniques, the encoder/modulator block of Fig. 1 uses a TC encoder and a QPSK modulator. However, since there are N_{A}N_{s} available symbols, a rate matching mechanism is used to repeat or puncture some bits. The rate R_{m} corresponds to the ratio between the number of input bits (3Q+12) of the rate matcher and the number of output bits (2N_{A}N_{s}). If R_{m}>1, then bits are punctured (with interleaving to ensure that the punctured bits are evenly spread over time), and when R_{m}<1, bits are repeated. An interleaver is used between the encoding and modulation processes. For the case of TCSCFDMA, precoding using a DFT of size N_{DFT} is applied.
While the derivations of the receivers could be obtained using the general expression of the likelihood (5), these computations are well known from the literature [28] and are not detailed here. For TCSCFDMA technique, the ML receiver is too complex to be considered as likelihood computation involved the whole symbol linked with the precoding. ZeroForcing (ZF) equalizer is used instead. For the turbo decoder, the max log approximation is considered and CRC is used as stop criterion for the iterations of the decoder, with a maximum number of iterations set to 10.
TurboFSK and Coplanar TurboFSK
The TurboFSK principle was introduced in [6, 20, 29]. The motivation for this scheme was to operate close to the Shannon capacity [30] while using a constant envelope modulation. TurboFSK can be implemented using an OFDM transceiver. The technique relies on the use of FSK modulation associated with a convolutional code and an iterative decoder. FSK is a common orthogonal modulation, based on an alphabet of orthogonal waveforms equivalent to pure frequencies. When using the previously introduced OFDM framework, only one of the N_{A} possible carriers is activated every time slot. The information is carried by the index of the activated carrier. The innovative aspect of the TurboFSK scheme is in the association of the encoding and modulation processes at the transmitter side. The turbo receiver exploits this association to operate at very low levels of SNR.
The design of the TurboFSK technique allows for flexibility in terms of choice of alphabet. In order to increase the spectral efficiency of the technique, a hybrid modulation alphabet mixing FSK modulation (orthogonal component) and PSK modulation (linear component) is considered [16]. The alphabet is constructed using N_{A} subsets \(\boldsymbol {\mathcal {A}}^{\delta }\), with δ∈{0,…,N_{A}−1} (N_{A} represents the number of possible frequencies for the FSK part of the alphabet), and M_{L} linear shifts given by the complex number z_{p} = exp{j2πp/M_{L}}, with p∈{0,…,M_{L}−1} (z_{p} thus represents the phase shifts from the PSK part of the alphabet). Symbols belonging to the same orthogonal subset are coplanar (they only differ by a complex multiplicative factor), hence the denomination Coplanar TurboFSK. A time symbol x^{i} from the alphabet is defined as
where f^{δ} is the vector of size N_{A} generating the orthogonal subset \(\boldsymbol {\mathcal {A}}^{\delta }\), with
and k∈{0,…,N_{FFT}−1}. Each orthogonal subset is of size M_{L} and the alphabet size is given by the product M=N_{A}M_{L}. The values M,M_{L}, and N_{A} must be powers of two. The spectral efficiency of the modulation only is given by
When setting M_{L}=1, the modulation becomes equivalent to a classic FSK modulation with M tones. Dealing with large values of size of FSK modulation leads to low spectral efficiencies [31]. However, for M_{L}>1, the phase of the symbols carries information. For a constant value of M, increasing the value of M_{L} leads to a reduction of the number of required orthogonal dimensions, thus improving the spectral efficiency of the modulation. Alternatively, for a constant number of orthogonal dimensions (i.e., a constant number of active carriers), increasing the value of M_{L} increases the size of the alphabet and the spectral efficiency.
The encoder/modulator block for the TurboFSK is depicted in Fig. 2. Similar to the transmitter presented in [6], the encoder consists in λ stages where each stage encodes an interleaved version of the Q information bits. The information block is divided into N_{q} information words of q bits. Eventually, a total of λ×(N_{q}+1) binary words of length q+1 are generated. Each binary word is mapped on one of the codewords of the alphabet. In order to fit the N_{s} available symbols, the rate matcher punctures or repeats some binary words so that
Unlike the other schemes, the rate matcher operates at the word level instead of the bit level. This is because entire words of size q+1 are associated to one of the symbols from the alphabet. The alphabet size is M=2^{q+1}. If the binary word b is associated to the symbol x^{i} as expressed in (7), then the output of the modulator is
This is very similar to FSK signaling as only one frequency carries information. However, unlike FSK where all the information is on the carrier index, additional bits can be mapped on the phase shift of the active carrier. When M_{L}=1, the scheme is equivalent to TurboFSK, but when M_{L}≥2, the scheme is called Coplanar TurboFSK. The resulting matrix of size N_{A}×N_{s} is sparse, as only N_{s} elements are different from 0.
The demodulator/decoder block is depicted in Fig. 2. First, the likelihood of all the symbols from the alphabet is computed. When combining the general expression (5) with (11), the likelihood given that the symbol x^{i} was sent is expressed
After computing the likelihood of each sequence, a matrix of size M×N_{s} is obtained, containing the likelihoods of all the possible symbols from the alphabet. The puncturing management block is then in charge to recover the original M×λ(N_{q}+1) matrix generated at the transmitter. If a symbol was repeated, columns corresponding to the repetitions of this symbol are added. If a symbol was punctured, a column of 0s is added. The resulting matrix corresponds to the channel observation of all stages.
The turbo decoder then uses the observation of the λ stages to perform the iterative decoding presented in [6] (detailed in [20, 29]), using the max log approximation. The CRC can be used as a stop criteria, as it is computed at the end of each iteration.
TurboZC and Coplanar TurboZC
We propose to extend the TurboFSK technique to another family of orthogonal alphabets, the chirp modulation [21, 22]. The chirps are selected as ZC sequences [26]. In the time expression of the alphabet symbols given in Eq. (7), the vectors f^{δ} are now constructed using ZC sequences (instead of the puretone complex exponential sequences for the TurboFSK). However, unlike the Coplanar TurboFSK, where symbols of the alphabet are expressed in time, we wish to express the symbols of the Coplanar TurboZC alphabet in frequency. We consider the base ZC sequence g_{μ} which has two parameters, its length N_{ZC} and its index μ, both positive integers. The sequence is given by
where mod(·,2) is the modulo two operator, and with n∈{0,…,N_{ZC}−1}. The zeroautocorrelation property of the ZC sequence allows for the construction of an orthogonal alphabet using circularly shifted versions of a base sequence. The base sequence g_{μ} with parameters N_{ZC}=N_{A} and μ=1 is selected.
An interesting implementation approach for the alphabet construction is the combination of the DFT matrix with the base sequence. The vectors f^{δ} are constructed from vectors of the DFT matrix multiplied by the base sequence g_{1}. Its samples are given by
with N_{A} a power of 2. This different approach also generates ZC sequences and allows for an efficient receiver architecture, as presented later.
The encoder/modulator of the Coplanar TurboZC system is strictly equivalent to the one depicted in Fig. 2 for the TurboFSK, apart from the modulation alphabet (the vectors generating the orthogonal subsets are expressed with (14) instead of (8)). The symbols from the alphabet will be mapped in the frequency domain, before the IFFT. The output of the block assuming that the current binary word is associated to the ith element of the alphabet is given by
with n∈{0,…,N_{A}−1}, δ the index for the orthogonal part, and p for the linear part (the PSK alphabet). When M_{L}=1, the denomination Coplanar TurboZC is simplified to TurboZC, as each orthogonal subset contains only one symbol.
Unlike the Coplanar TurboFSK, the output matrix, of size N_{A}×N_{s}, is no longer sparse. Each column consists of a delayed ZC sequence. One property of the ZC sequence is its invariance to FFT operations. However, in this case, the size of the IFFT N_{FFT} is different from the size of the sequence N_{A}; thus, the resulting time signal will not be a CAZAC sequence.
The demodulator/receiver for Coplanar TurboZC is very similar to the one proposed for Coplanar TurboFSK, depicted in Fig. 3. The only difference is the likelihood computation. With the expression Eq. (5) obtained from a generic sequence and using Eq. (15), the likelihood is given by
Note that the first part of Eq. (5) is included in the constant, as it can be shown independent of the index i. In order to compute the likelihood, each received sequence of size N_{A} is multiplied by the conjugate of the channel coefficients and by the conjugate of the base sequence g_{1} used to build the alphabet. A FFT of size N_{A} is then applied. The likelihood of the codeword i is finally obtained by multiplying the δth output of the FFT by the linear coefficient p and retrieving the real part. Compared to the Coplanar TurboFSK, the computation of the likelihood for the Coplanar TurboZC requires two additional steps: the multiplication by the base sequence and the FFT of the size N_{A}.
TCFSK
The use of the FSK modulation associated with the [13 15] TC can also be considered. For this scheme, the transmitter performs turbo encoding associated with a rate matching mechanism and an interleaver. FSK modulation is applied and the output is expressed with (11). The receiver computes the LLR of the binary sequence using
which is obtained by combining Eqs. (12) and (6) and the max log approximation. Turbo decoding is then performed, similar to the TCOFDM. Unlike Coplanar TurboFSK, the TCFSK scheme does not combine the demodulation and the decoding in a joint process. It nonetheless offers a constant envelope modulation.
Results and discussion
The performance of each scheme is assessed over several types of transmission channels, and the envelope variations of each technique is evaluated. In order to restrict the study, some parameters are kept constant for all the schemes. As all the schemes were presented associated with the same FFT configuration, the parameters for this architecture can be taken equal for all the schemes. The parameters are chosen as corresponding to the mode 1.4 MHz of LTE, i.e., latest NB IoT standard [14]. Two different scenarios are considered: a lowrate (8.24 kbps) as well as a highrate scenario (46.68 kbps). This will exhibit the impact of the parameters of the schemes on the performance, notably the size of the linear part of the alphabet for both Coplanar TurboFSK and Coplanar TurboZC. Specific values for the parameters of the OFDM framework are selected. The selected parameters are given in Table 1, where f_{s} is the sampling frequency, Δf the subcarrier spacing and f_{c} the carrier frequency. With N_{A}=16 active carriers, the bandwidth of the transmitted signal is equal to B=240 kHz. The spectral efficiency can be computed with
and the data rate is given by R=Q/N_{s}.
The first scenario considers the transmission of Q=1000 bits over N_{s}=1700 OFDM symbols. The spectral efficiency is equal to η=4.29·10^{−3} bits/s/Hz, which gives a data rate of 8.24 kbps, a rather low value. This value is consistent with the fact that longrange solutions must transmit at low data rates to provide low sensitivity levels [6, 20]. Due to the specific number of symbols, the rate matcher of each technique has a different output rate. The equivalent number of repetitions given by 1/R_{m} and the parameters for each technique is presented in Table 2. For this scenario, we consider the TurboFSK and TurboZC (thus M_{L}=1) with λ=5. According to the results found in [32], it is the value of λ that gives the lowest E_{b}/N_{0} for this size of alphabet (M=16).
For the second scenario, a higher data rate is considered. The same packet size M=1000 is transmitted over N_{s}=300 OFDM symbols. This gives a spectral efficiency of η=2.43·10^{−2} bits/s/Hz and a data rate equal to 46.68 kbps. The TCFSK solution is not considered for this scenario, as the value of N_{s} would imply a very large number of punctured bits, making the solution inadequate. The parameters for the four compared techniques are presented in Table 3. Both Coplanar TurboFSK and Coplanar TurboZC are selected with parameters M_{L}=32 and λ=3, which gives an alphabet size equal to M=512. In [32], the combination M=512 and λ=3 was demonstrated to minimize the required E_{b}/N_{0}, for the orthogonal case (i.e., M_{L}=1). However, for this specific configuration, a loss in required E_{b}/N_{0} is expected for two reasons: 22% of the symbols are punctured and the choice of M_{L}=32 PSK will reduce the energy efficiency.
The performance of the packet error rate (PER) is simulated for various levels of SNR and three different channels: the AWGN channel and a Rayleigh fading channel with both static and mobile conditions (with classical Jake’s model [33]). Perfect time and frequency synchronizations are assumed.
Under AWGN
The AWGN channel, i.e., a channel with a single and constant propagation path, is first considered. For the first scenario, the PER performance of the five different techniques is depicted in Fig. 4a, versus the SNR. Very low levels of SNR are considered. The TCOFDM and TCSCFDMA schemes are equivalent under AWGN and offer the best performance. TurboFSK and TurboZC are also equivalent under this channel and exhibit a 0.2dB loss at a PER of 10^{−3}. Better performance could be achieved by selecting other combinations of alphabet size and number of repetition λ [32]. The TCFSK suffers from a loss of 2.9 dB for the same PER versus TCOFDM. Unlike TurboFSK, the receiver of this scheme does not combine FSK demodulation and turbo decoding in the same procedure. Better performance is achieved using a more sophisticated receiver such as the one considered in TurboFSK.
The PER performance for the second scenario and for the four compared techniques is depicted in Fig. 4b. The levels of required SNR are higher than those for the first scenario, due to the increase of the data rate. Similar to the first scenario and due to the choice of the AWGN channel, TCOFDM and TCSCFDMA are equivalent for this scenario, as well as Coplanar TurboFSK and Coplanar TurboZC. Their performance is less than 0.4 dB away from the TCOFDM, for a PER of 10^{−2}. With this size of alphabet and number of repetitions (M=512 and λ=3), the TurboFSK (i.e., with M_{L}=1) overcomes the [13 15] TC [20]. However, the use of the linear modulation of size 32 associated with the puncturing of 22% of the codewords induces a loss of performance.
These simulations include the loss in spectral efficiency incurred by the introduction of the CP and the use of the CRC. The first is necessary to avoid intersymbol interference (ISI) and intercarrier interference (ICI) when considering multipath channels. The latter is used to detect errors in the decoded packet and to compute the PER. Since these two elements induce a loss in spectral efficiency, this corresponds to a loss in E_{b}/N_{0}. Using a CRC of size 16, the loss is expressed in decibel as
With the considered parameters, this loss is equal to 0.37 dB. These results demonstrate the benefits of considering a joint coding and modulation scheme with respect to the use of FSK and a classical turbo code. When compared to turbocoded modulations with repetition scheme, the performance loss of the proposed scheme is less than a few tenth of a decibel.
Under static Rayleigh fading channel
Simulations under the static Rayleigh fading channel are considered. Static implies that there is no relative velocity between the transmitter and the receiver, i.e., the channel does not evolve during the transmission of the packet. The Extended Typical Urban (ETU) profile [34, p. 191] is considered for the path gains and delays. This profile has a channel delay spread equal to τ=5 µs, while the CP duration is equal to 4.6875 µs. This profile thus represents difficult conditions for the OFDM system. The coherence bandwidth of the channel is equal to τ=1/τ=200 kHz. Since the bandwidth of the signal B=240 kHz is superior to the coherence bandwidth, frequency diversity is guaranteed.
In order to compare the schemes, the performance over a large number of channel realizations is computed (each realization is randomly generated following the Rayleigh model). Average performance over the channel realizations is presented. Since each realization has its own gain, the SNR is estimated at the input of the receiver. In the figures, the average SNR over all the realizations is presented on the horizontal axis. All the compared techniques are stressed with the same realizations of the channel. A large number of realizations is computed, and perfect channel state information (CSI) is considered.
The performance of the five schemes for the first scenario is depicted in Fig. 5a. TCOFDM outperforms all the other schemes with a PER of 10^{−2} at − 11.4 dB of SNR. Performance of TurboZC and TurboFSK is only 0.1 and 0.2 dB respectively away from TCOFDM. TCFSK exhibits a loss of 3.1 dB with respect to TCOFDM, as for the AWGN case. The performance loss compared to TurboFSK is due to the use of a different decoder, since the signaling technique is identical. TCSCFDMA exhibits the worst performance, but this can be incurred to the choice of the ZF equalizer. Other equalizers could be considered such as the minimum mean square error (MMSE) and may lead to better performance.
For the second scenario, the performance of the four schemes is depicted in Fig. 5b. As for the case of the AWGN channel, increasing the data rate also increased the range of SNR for equivalent performance. Similar to the first scenario, the TCSCFDMA exhibits poor performance due to the use of the ZF equalizer. TCOFDM and Coplanar TurboZC have similar performance, reaching a PER of 10^{−2} at a SNR of − 3.8 dB. Unlike the other scenario, Coplanar TurboFSK suffers from a 1.8dB loss compared to TCOFDM and Coplanar TurboZC for the same PER. Both Coplanar TurboFSK and Coplanar TurboZC use the exact same parameters. The difference in performance can thus be attributed to the use of different signaling techniques. Since the ZC signaling spreads the energy of one symbol on all the active carriers, frequency diversity is better exploited. Carriers with higher gains may compensate for faded carriers. However, in the FSK case, a fading on the frequency that carries the energy will induce the loss of the symbol. The difference in performance is reduced in the other scenario, which has a lower data rate. This may suggest that the use of a higher order of linear modulation (M_{L}=32 for this scenario) amplifies the difference between ZC and FSK signaling.
For the lowthroughput case, performance remains the same for TCOFDM system and the proposed scheme (TurboFSK and TurboZC). In case of high throughput, the frequency diversity provided by Turbo ZC gives an advantage with respect to Coplanar TurboFSK making Coplanar TurboZC interesting when compared to TCOFDM.
Under Rayleigh fading channel with mobility (JakesDoppler spectrum)
Relative mobility between the transmitter and the receiver is now considered, along with the ETU fading profile. The relative velocity between the transmitter and the receiver is equal to υ=50 km/h. With the selected carrier frequency, given in Table 1, the Doppler frequency is equal to f_{d}=115.8 Hz, giving a coherence time of t_{coh}=1/f_{d}=8.63 ms. The coherence is thus 129 times greater than the symbol time (equal to 66.6 µs). The receiver can assume a constant vector H for each symbol, which is actually the timeaverage estimation of the true channel.
For the first scenario, the performance of the four schemes under mobility condition is depicted in Fig. 6a. When compared to the case of the static ETU depicted in Fig. 5, mobility significantly improves the performance of all the schemes. These schemes benefit from a large amount of redundancy (for example, the encoded bits for TCOFDM and TCSCFDMA are repeated more than 17 times, and the TC itself offers redundancy). In the mobility case, a symbol and its repetitions experience different channel gains. This is a form of time diversity and performance tends toward the AWGN case when the order of diversity is very large [31]. While the TCSCFDMA exhibited poor performance in the static ETU case, the time diversity offered by the repetitions overcomes the negative impact of equalization and the scheme is less than 1 dB away from TCOFDM. The TCFSK scheme is 3.5 dB away from the TCOFDM technique. The difference of performance in the static ETU case was in the same order of magnitude. Thanks to the use of repetition and a low spectral efficiency modulation technique, the TCFSK scheme also benefits from diversity. TurboFSK and TurboZC now exhibits a 0.6 and 0.4dB gap respectively versus TCOFDM. Both schemes use λ=5 repetitions, which offers a diversity comparable to the other techniques.
The performance under mobility conditions for the second scenario is depicted in Fig. 6b. Both the TCOFDM and TCSCFDMA schemes benefit from diversity due to the redundancy but at a smaller extent as there are only three repetitions. The curves tend less towards the AWGN case. While the Coplanar TurboZC reached the performance of TCOFDM for the static ETU case and was 0.5 dB away at a PER of 10^{−2} in the AWGN case, the gap with TCOFDM is now equal to 2.4 dB. Coplanar TurboFSK exhibits an even worse performance and the gap between Coplanar TurboFSK and Coplanar TurboZC is now equal to 5.4 dB. For these two techniques, the lack of diversity gain could be explained by the combination of two aspects: the reduction of the value of λ to 3 and the rather high number of punctured codewords. Also, with the configuration M_{L}=32, more information is mapped on the linear dimensions. This combination has a devastating effect for the Coplanar TurboFSK, but it has less effects on the Coplanar TurboZC, most likely due to its better frequency diversity. The spread spectrum feature of the ZC signaling seems again beneficial, and Coplanar TurboZC outperforms Coplanar TurboFSK. When considering an even higher speed, Coplanar TurboZC, Coplanar TurboFSK, and TCFSK will not suffer from ICI since there is no multiplexing (unlike TCOFDM and TCSCFDMA). This will nonetheless induce a spreading of the energy over the adjacent frequencies, i.e., a loss of power of the transmitted frequency for FSK signaling (along with a gain in the adjacent frequencies) and a distortion of the ZC sequence for the ZC signaling.
In case of mobility associated with fading channel, TCOFDM remains the best choice. The use of spreading, i.e., SCFDMA, enables to combine low envelope variation as well as good PER performance. We see here the limitations of the proposed schemes. However, we can expect a similar performance in terms of PER when considering Coplanar TurboZC with respect to SCFDMA. However, as previously mentioned, the proposed scheme drastically reduces the envelope variation of signal. Therefore, we describe, in the next subsection, a framework to globally compare the different solutions taking into account both channel performance and power consumption.
Envelope variations
In order to study the variations of the envelope, we propose to study the InstantaneoustoAverage Power Ratio (IAPR) [35], which is equivalent to a PeaktoAverage Power Ratio (PAPR) over one sample. The study of the IAPR is more relevant than the measure of the PAPR over a larger number of samples, as it will consider all the samples that potentially reach the nonlinear region of the PA [35]. Evaluating the envelope variations is critical to tune the operating point of the PA, the last and most energyconsuming elements of the transmission chain [7, 9]. The efficiency of the PA will influence both the consumption of the system and its cost. Since the IAPR describes the variation of the envelope, it also indicates how to drive the input of the PA in order to avoid the saturation and nonlinear region. Usually, a backoff from the saturation point is considered, to ensure the saturation to be reached for only a given probability. However, the consequence of selecting a large backoff (or equally, that high values for the IAPR are more likely) is that the average level of output power is lowered. The efficiency of the PA can be shown to be dependent on the level of output power [10]. Consequently, the variation of the envelope is a major concern regarding the consumption of the system.
For all the compared solutions, the IAPR is measured from the time signal which is sent through the channel, after the addition of the CP in Fig. 1. For a sufficient statistic, 1000 packets are simulated using the parameters of Table 1.
The Complementary Cumulative Distribution Function (CCDF) of the IAPR is depicted for the five schemes in Fig. 7. TCOFDM has the largest variations and exhibits a probability of 10^{−3} to have an IAPR larger than 8 dB. TCSCFDMA shows a 2dB improvement in its variations, thanks to the use of precoding. As expected, TCFSK and Coplanar TurboFSK have the same performance, i.e., an IAPR of 0 dB. Both techniques rely on the use of FSK modulation which exhibits a constant envelope, and the Coplanar TurboFSK employs phase shifts as for the coplanar value, maintaining the constant envelope property. However, even though the Coplanar TurboZC was constructed using CAZAC sequences, it does not exhibit a constant envelope. This is because the sequence was mapped in the frequency domain. The use of the IFFT oversamples the sequence to give a resulting time signal convolved with the IFFT window that does not have a constant envelope. Additionally, the number of possible sequences is equal to 16 (the value of N_{A}), i.e., the variations of a given signal will correspond (on average) to the variations of the 16 possible sequences. When the ratio N_{FFT}/N_{A} is an integer, all the sequences have the same distribution of the IAPR. The IAPR consists in a finite number of values (hence the discrete CCDF) and could be evaluated simply by considering the base sequence. The maximum IAPR of the Coplanar TurboZC appears to be around 2.6 dB, a value that depends on the value of N_{A} and the choice of the base sequence.
The measure of the IAPR clearly emphasizes the main benefits of the proposed schemes, the constant amplitude property of Coplanar TurboFSK, and the low PAPR of Coplanar TurboZC, offering a gain of 5.4 dB versus TCOFDM. It also gives information on how far you must reduce the input power (Input Backoff (IBO)) of a PA in order to limit nonlinearity effects that could decrease the performance of the system.
Energy consumption
In the previous section, we stress the gain/loss we have considering new modulation and coding scheme. As a synthesis, we propose to balance the gain/loss through an estimation of the energy consumption of a device. In one hand, the proposed schemes are working worse on channel with mobility. On the other hand, a low PAPR level is achieved. The relation between the IBO and PA efficiency was previously mentioned. The theoretical efficiency of the PA can actually be shown conversely dependent on the level of IAPR [10, 36]. In Fig. 8, the drain efficiency versus the Input Backoff is depicted for class A amplifiers, as well as the corresponding efficiency and PAPR of the five techniques when considering a CCDF of 10^{−3} for the IAPR. By selecting Coplanar TurboFSK instead of TCOFDM, the theoretical efficiency of the PA can be increased by 37%. Coplanar TurboZC also offers a gain in efficiency. Regarding the second scenario previously introduced, using the Coplanar TurboZC seems to be an interesting tradeoff versus TCOFDM, as the PA efficiency can be increased while maintaining almost similar performance (unlike the Coplanar TurboFSK, which exhibits a more important performance loss). In order to illustrate this effect, we propose to consider the energy consumption associated to one packet.
The energy E consumed by the transmission of the packet can be used to estimate the battery life. It is usually expressed by the product P_{t}T, where P_{t} is the transmission power for the given QoS and T the packet duration [9]. However, since the PA has a specific efficiency ε<1 (which depends on the technology used), the consumed energy is actually given by
where the values of P_{t} and ε vary depending on the technology selected. For a given QoS, if the required SNR is Δ dB lower for the scheme X than for the considered reference, then the transmitted power can be reduced by Δ dB. The efficiency ε is given by the value of the PAPR, which is selected for a CCDF of 10^{−3}. While considering the TCOFDM as a reference, the ratio of consumed energy is given by
where ε_{0} is the efficiency for the TCOFDM, ε_{X} for the technique X, and Δ_{X} the difference in SNR (in linear) between the technique X and the TCOFDM. When ρ_{X}<1, this means that compared to TCOFDM, more energy is consumed, and eventually the battery life is reduced. When ρ_{X}>1, battery life is increased. This quantity describes two variations, the efficiency of the PA and the difference in performance, and how they can potentially balance each other. Indeed, a technique having a very good efficiency but poor performance may have a value of ρ_{X} inferior to 1, meaning that the loss in performance is not balanced by the increase of the efficiency.
For all the scenarios and the channels, the ratio of consumed energy is depicted in Fig. 9. TCSCFDMA offers a small gain in energy consumption, except for the static ETU case where its low performance induces an increase of the transmitted power. It should be mentioned that better performance could be obtained by considering a different equalizer. TCFSK offers a gain thanks to its constant envelope. Coplanar TurboFSK gives important gains (up to 2.5 under AWGN, i.e., an increase of the battery life by a factor 2.5) but suffers from its low performance under mobility conditions. Finally, Coplanar TurboZC offers an interesting tradeoff with gains included between 1 and 1.9 depending on the conditions.
To conclude, both proposed schemes really improve the power consumption with respect to TCOFDM and SCFDMA. Coplanar TurboFSK is particularly interesting for static channel but suffers from poor performances in case of mobility. In the latest case, Coplanar TurboZC offers a tradeoff. When high throughput and mobility are considered, one can expect the best performance with respect to TCOFDM and SCFDMA. In case of low throughput, performance of Coplanar TurboZC remains below coplanar TurboFSK but the gap is quite small. This makes Coplanar TurboZC a promising scheme.
Conclusions
In the context of LPWA networks, reaching low levels of sensitivity and reducing the consumption at the device level are major concerns. Nonetheless, coexistence and integration into existing frameworks should be considered to ease the deployment procedure and reduce costs. In this work, we proposed the integration of TurboFSK in the OFDM framework and extended the original scheme to the Coplanar TurboFSK, which employs a hybrid modulation alphabet, and to the Coplanar TurboZC, which uses another orthogonal alphabet based on ZC sequences.
We demonstrated the possibility for the proposed techniques to use a transmitter and a receiver based on an OFDMlike architecture. Simulations demonstrated that the proposed schemes achieve performance close to TCOFDM in AWGN conditions and Rayleigh fading channels for both static and mobility conditions. However, while TCOFDM exhibits important envelope variations, a known effect for this modulation, the proposed techniques offer different levels of reduction of the envelope variations, which improves the efficiency of the PA. For example, using Coplanar TurboFSK with a class A amplifier can lead to a theoretical drain efficiency of 60%. Coplanar TurboFSK trades a small loss in PER for a constant envelope and is a very powerful alternative to the use of classic OFDM, potentially increasing the battery life by a factor 2.5. The presented Coplanar TurboZC exhibits higher envelope variations but exploits the frequency diversity in a better way, offering performance even closer to the TCOFDM. It appears to be an even more interesting alternative to TCOFDM and offers a battery life gain for all the considered conditions.
The proposed solutions can be seen as promising additional modes for LPWA transmission, as they can be included in a scheduled network based on an OFDM framework. The solutions could be part of the NBIoT standard as a new lowpower mode which allows a significant reduction of the consumption at the device level.
Abbreviations
 4G:

Fourth generation
 5G:

Fifth generation
 AWGN:

Additive white Gaussian noise
 CAZAC:

Constant amplitude zero autocorrelation
 CTFSK:

Coplanar turboFSK
 CCDF:

Complementary cumulative distribution function
 CC:

Convolutional code
 CFO:

Carrier frequency offset
 CP:

Cyclic prefix
 CRC:

Cyclic redundancy check
 CSI:

Channel state information
 DFT:

Discrete Fourier transform
 ETU:

Extended typical urban
 FEC:

Forward error correction
 FFT:

Fast Fourier transform
 FIR:

Finite impulse response
 FSK:

Frequency shift keying
 IAPR:

Instantaneoustoaverage power ratio
 IBO:

Input backoff
 ICI:

Intercarrier interference
 IDFT:

Inverse discrete Fourier transform
 IFFT:

Inverse fast Fourier transform
 IoT:

Internet of things
 ISI:

Intersymbol interference
 LLR:

Log likelihood ratio
 LPWA:

Lowpower widearea
 LTE:

Longterm evolution
 ML:

Maximum likelihood
 MMSE:

Minimum mean square error
 NBIoT:

Narrowband IoT
 NB:

Narrow band
 OFDM:

Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
 PAPR:

Peaktoaverage power ratio
 PA:

Power amplifier
 PER:

Packet error rate
 PHY:

Physical
 PSK:

Phase shift keying
 QoS:

Quality of service
 QPSK:

Quadrature phase shift keying
 RX:

Receiver
 SCFDMA:

Single carrier frequency division multiple access
 SNR:

Signaltonoise ratio
 TCFSK:

Turbo coded frequency shift keying
 TCOFDM:

Turbo coded orthogonal frequency division multiplexing
 TCSCFDMA:

Turbo coded single carrier frequency division multiple access
 TC:

Turbo code
 TX:

Transmitter
 UL:

Uplink
 ZC:

ZadoffChu
 ZF:

Zeroforcing
References
MR Palattella, M Dohler, A Grieco, G Rizzo, J Torsner, T Engel, L Ladid, Internet of Things in the 5G era: enablers, architecture, and business models. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.34(3), 510–527 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2016.2525418.
ITU, Series Y: global information infrastructure, internet protocol aspects and nextgeneration networks next generation networks – frameworks and functional architecture models. https://www.itu.int/rec/TRECY.2060201206I.
U Raza, P Kulkarni, M Sooriyabandara, Low Power Wide Area networks: an overview. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor.PP(99), 1–1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2652320.
HP Enterprise, Low Power Wide Area (LPWA) networks play an important role in connecting a range of devices. Business white paper (2016). http://files.asset.microfocus.com/4aa65354/en/4aa65354.pdf.
T Rebbeck, M Mackenzie, N Afonso, Lowpowered wireless solutions have the potential to increase the M2M market by over 3 billion connections. Analysys Mason (2014). https://iotbusinessnews.com/download/whitepapers/ANALYSISMASONLPWAtoincreaseM2Mmarket.pdf.
Y Roth, JB Doré, L Ros, V Berg, TurboFSK, a physical layer for lowpower widearea networks: analysis and optimization. Elsevier C. R. Phys.18(2), 178–188 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2016.11.005. Energy and radiosciences.
FH Raab, P Asbeck, S Cripps, PB Kenington, ZB Popovic, N Pothecary, JF Sevic, NO Sokal, Power amplifiers and transmitters for rf and microwave. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech.50(3), 814–826 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/22.989965.
H Ochiai, in Proceedings IEEE 56th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2. Power efficiency comparison of OFDM and singlecarrier signals, (2002), pp. 899–903. https://doi.org/10.1109/VETECF.2002.1040730.
S Cui, AJ Goldsmith, A Bahai, Energyconstrained modulation optimization. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 4(5), 2349–2360 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2005.853882.
SL Miller, RJ O’Dea, Peak power and bandwidth efficient linear modulation. IEEE Trans. Commun.46(12), 1639–1648 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/26.737402.
LTE Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (EUTRA): physical channels and modulation. 3GPP TS 36.211, V13.2.0, Release 13 (2016). http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/136200_136299/136211/13.02.00_60/ts_136211v130200p.pdf.
Whitepaper Narrowband Internet of Things. Rohde & Schwarz (2016). https://cdn.rohdeschwarz.com/pws/dl_downloads/dl_application/application_notes/1ma266/1MA266_0e_NB_IoT.pdf.
R Ratasuk, B Vejlgaard, N Mangalvedhe, A Ghosh, in 2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshops (WCNCW). NBIoT System for M2M communication (Doha, 2016), pp. 428–432. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNCW.2016.7552737.
YPE Wang, X Lin, A Adhikary, A Grovlen, Y Sui, Y Blankenship, J Bergman, HS Razaghi, A primer on 3GPP Narrowband Internet of Things. IEEE Commun. Mag.55(3), 117–123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600510CM.
C Berrou, A Glavieux, P Thitimajshima, in Communications, 1993. ICC ’93 Geneva. Technical Program, Conference Record, IEEE International Conference on, vol.2. Near Shannon limit errorcorrecting coding and decoding: Turbocodes. 1 (Geneva, 1993), pp. 1064–1070. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.1993.397441.
R Padovani, J Wolf, Coded Phase/Frequency Modulation. IEEE Trans. Commun.34(5), 446–453 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1986.1096564.
RA Khalona, GE Atkin, JL LoCicero, On the performance of a hybrid frequency and phase shift keying modulation technique. IEEE Trans. Commun.41(5), 655–659 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1109/26.225476.
A Latif, ND Gohar, Error rate performance of hybrid QAMFSK in OFDM systems exhibiting low PAPR. Sci. China Ser F Inf. Sci.52(10), 1875–1880 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s114320090165y.
S Hong, M Sagong, C Lim, K Cheun, S Cho, in 2013 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps). FQAM : A modulation scheme for beyond 4G cellular wireless communication systems (Atlanta, 2013), pp. 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOMW.2013.6824956.
Y Roth, The physical layer for low power wide area networks: a study of combined modulation and coding associated with an iterative receiver. PhD Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes (2017). https://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/tel01568794.
A Springer, W Gugler, M Huemer, L Reindl, CCW Ruppel, R Weigel, in IEEE/AFCEA EUROCOMM 2000. Information Systems for Enhanced Public Safety and Security (Cat. No.00EX405). Spread spectrum communications using chirp signals (Munich, 2000), pp. 166–170. https://doi.org/10.1109/EURCOM.2000.874794.
B Reynders, S Pollin, in 2016 Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technologies (SCVT). Chirp spread spectrum as a modulation technique for long range communication (Mons, 2016), pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCVT.2016.7797659.
LoRa Alliance. https://www.loraalliance.org/. Accessed: 19 June 2018.
OBA Seller, N Sornin, Low power long range transmitter. US 20140219329 A1, Aug 2014. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140219329.
L Vangelista, Frequency Shift Chirp Modulation: The LoRa Modulation. IEEE Signal Process. Lett.24(12), 1818–1821 (2017).
D Chu, Polyphase codes with good periodic correlation properties (corresp.)IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory. 18(4), 531–532 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1972.1054840.
MC Valenti, J Sun, The UMTS turbo code and an efficient decoder implementation suitable for software defined radios. Int J. Wireless Inf. Networks. 8:, 203–216 (2001).
Z Wang, GB Giannakis, Wireless multicarrier communications. IEEE Signal Proc. Mag.17(3), 29–48 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/79.841722.
Y Roth, JB Doré, L Ros, V Berg, in 2015 IEEE 16th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC). TurboFSK: a new uplink scheme for Low Power Wide Area networks (Stockholm, 2015), pp. 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPAWC.2015.7227004.
CE Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J.27(3), 379–423 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.15387305.1948.tb01338.x.
JG Proakis, Digital Communications 3rd Edition. Communications and signal processing (McGrawHill, New York, 1995).
Y Roth, JB Doré, L Ros, V Berg, in 2016 9th International Symposium on Turbo Codes and Iterative Information Processing (ISTC). EXIT chart optimization of TurboFSK: Application to Low Power Wide Area networks (Brest, 2016), pp. 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTC.2016.7593074.
(WC Jakes, DC Cox, eds.), Microwave Mobile Communications (WileyIEEE Press, Hoboken, 1994).
Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (EUTRA): Base Station (BS) Radio Transmission and Reception. 3GPP TS 36.104, V14.3.0, Release 14 (2017). http://www.etsi.org/deliver/etsi_ts/136100_136199/136104/14.03.00_60/ts_136104v140300p.pdf.
P Bento, J Nunes, M Gomes, R Dinis, V Silva, in 2014 IEEE 80th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2014Fall). Measuring the magnitude of envelope fluctuations: should we use the papr? (Vancouver, 2014), pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTCFall.2014.6966053.
V Mannoni, V Berg, F Dehmas, D Noguet, A flexible physical layer for LPWA cognitive radio oriented wireless networks. CrownCom 2017, vol. 228 (Springer, Cham, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/9783319762074_27.
Acknowledgements
The research leading to these results received funding from the European Commission H2020 program under grant agreement number 723247 (5GChampion project). This work was also supported by the French Agence Nationale de la Recheche (ANR), under grant agreement ANR16CE250002 (project EPHYL).
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
YR and JBD conceived of the presented idea. YR developed the theory and performed the computations. JBD, LR, and VB verified the analytical methods. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Roth, Y., Doré, JB., Ros, L. et al. Contender waveforms for LowPower WideArea networks in a scheduled 4G OFDM framework. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2018, 43 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s1363401805664
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s1363401805664
Keywords
 LPWA
 OFDM
 Turbo codes
 FSK
 ZadoffChu
 Constant envelope