 Research Article
 Open Access
Recovery of Myocardial Kinematic Function without the Time History of External Loads
 Heye Zhang^{1}Email author,
 Bo Li^{1},
 Alistair A. Young^{1} and
 Peter J. Hunter^{1}
https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/310473
© Heye Zhang et al. 2010
 Received: 30 April 2009
 Accepted: 24 June 2009
 Published: 24 August 2009
Abstract
A timedomain filtering algorithm is proposed to recover myocardial kinematic function using outputonly measurements without the time history of external loads. The main contribution of this work is that the overall effect of all the external loads on the myocardium is treated as a random variable disturbed by the Gaussian white noise because the external loads of the myocardium are usually unknown in practical exercises. The kernel of our proposed algorithm is an iterative, multiframe, and sequential filtering procedure consisting of a Kalman filter and a leastsquares filter. In our proposed implementation, the initial guess of myocardial kinematic function and residual innovation of all the state variables are first computed using a Kalman filter via state space equations only driven by the Gaussian white noise, and then the residual innovation is fed into a leastsquares filter to estimate the total external loads of the myocardium. In the end, the initial guess of myocardial kinematic function is corrected using external loads provided by the leastsquares filter. After the introduction of the whole structure of our algorithm, we demonstrate the ability of the framework on synthetic data and MR image sequences.
Keywords
 Kalman Filter
 Process Noise
 Biomechanical Model
 Input Force
 Triphenyl Tetrazolium Chloride
1. Introduction
Ischemic heart disease (IHD), or myocardial ischaemia, is a heart disease characterized by restricted blood supply to a certain area of muscle wall of the heart (myocardium), usually due to the blockage or shrinkage of the coronary artery. The restricted blood supply in the particular area of the myocardium can cause dysfunction or even permanent damage (infarction) if left untreated. In daily clinical practice, because of recent technological advances in cardiac imaging modalities, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), multislice computed tomography (CT), and echocardiography, assessment of the regional kinematic function of the myocardium has been largely applied to estimate the location of infarction and evaluate the seriousness of infarction by clinical specialists. In the medical image community, the idea to indicate IHD or infarction accurately via quantification of myocardial kinematic function has stimulated a huge number of computing algorithms to overcome practical difficulties, for example, relatively sparse spatial resolution and low temporal sampling rate of current imaging modalities. Most early works utilize pixel intensities to evaluate myocardial kinematic function using one or even more imaging modalities [1–3], but the performance of these approaches varies largely because of the quality of the image. Recently, more and more feature points, such as tagging lines [4–6] or boundaries [7, 8], have been introduced as extra constraints to enhance the performance of intensitybased approaches, however, these intensitybased approaches still suffer from noise in the image data. The recovery of a dense motion field and deformation parameters for the entire myocardium from a sparse set of imagederived displacements/veolcities seems an illposed problem which needs more physically meaningful constraints to obtain a unique solution in some optimal sense.
Therefore, a large number of strategies have been developed over the past two decades to introduce a variety of physically meaningful constraints into myocardial motion analysis, including notable examples of mathematically motivated regularization [9], deformable superquadrics [10], spatiotemporal BSpline [11], Fisher estimator with smoothness and incompressibility assumptions [12], as well as finiteelement method (FEM) based modal analysis [13–15]. From the introduction of biomechanical modelbased constraint [16–18] into the medical image community, the biomechanical model has attracted great attention because of its physiologically meaningful representation of myocardial dynamics. Contrary to previous frametoframe strategies with biomechanical modelbased constraint, multiframe analysis strategies are gradually accepted since the periodic nature of myocardial dynamics is widely recognized. A number of image analysis works are motivated to adopt different biomechanical models from system point of view [19, 20]. In [21], the authors adopt system control theory [22] into medical image analysis by establishing a biomechanical modelbased statespace framework for the multiframe estimation of the periodic myocardial motion: "the physical constraints take the role of the spatial regulator of the myocardial behavior and spatial filter/interpolator of the data measurements, while techniques from statistical filtering theory impose spatiotemporal constraints to facilitate the incorporation of multiframe information to generate optimal estimates of the myocardial kinematics in D." The authors of [21] also apply a similar statespace filtering structure to estimate parameters of biomechanical models and myocardial motion simultaneously in [23, 24], but the filtering techniques in [23, 24] are realized by the extended Kalman filter and filter, respectively. However, the computation of the Kalman filter has prohibited its popularity in D motion analysis. Thus, a reducedrank Kalman filter was proposed to reduce the computation and estimate D myocardial kinematic function using a small number of principal modal components in [25]. In spite of the potential advantage of computational speed in [25], the effect of infarction might not be reflected by a small number of principal modal components because the influence of infarction to the whole myocardium could be localized and small. In the most recent works feedback, control techniques are also applied to estimate cardiac motion with a collocate state estimator [26] and parameters of biomechanical model using an extended Kalman filter [27] or filter [28] seperately. Despite sharing the same origin from the control theory, techniques in [26–28] still belong to the class of "deterministic models" as defined in [29], which are different from "stochastic models" in [21, 24]. However, the importance of external loads to the biomechanical model has not been addressed in multiframe medical image analysis in spite of a simple fact that the loading condition of each patient is not the same. Though different biomechanical constraints, from isotropic material to anisotropic material or from small deformation to large deformation, have been applied to myocardial motion analysis, most of works assume external loads of the biomechanical model as implicitly available forces from the imagederived boundary [18, 23, 24] or from a priori knowledge [26–28, 30]. In [31], external loads are obtained by a weighting between boundaryderived force from images and the electrical force from simulation. All these deterministic treatments of external loads are not patientspecific and a minor error in external loads might alert the dynamics of the same biomechanical model largely, which would damage the positive effect of model constraint eventually. In [32], a frametoframe statistical EM algorithm is applied to estimate the active forces, strains, and stresses together despite the fact that the active forces are timevarying after the displacements of the myocardium are reconstructed by using the MRISPAMM tagging technique and a deformable model from images.
Inspired by the work [33] of input estimation in the inverse heating problem without the time history of external input, we proposed a biomechanical constrained sequential filtering framework which performs multiframe estimation of the nonrigid myocardial kinematic function and external loads of system simultaneously from medical image sequence. Our work is also developed from earlier works like the statespacebased motion recovery algorithms with the external loads constructed from boundaries [21, 24] and modelbased filtering framework with external loads simulated from an electromechanical coupling model [30]. Contrary to previous approaches using deterministic approximation of external loads, our proposed framework treats external loads as a stochastic input after the biomechanical model is converted into a stochastic statespace representation, which is more rational because of largely unknown knowledge of external loads of each patient's heart. Since the external loads in our approach are treated as a stochastic variable, we start to call external loads as input forces from here, which is a proper description in the stochastic control theory [22]. Therefore, the main difference of our work to previous multiframe estimation efforts is that rather than making ad hoc mathematical assumptions on the behavior of input forces, we allow uncertainties inside input forces because of unobservable loading condition of the heart, which is a better description of clinical situation from the stochastic control theory point of view. To achieve optimal estimation, we cyclically feed the updated estimation of input forces and imagingderived data into the filtering framework until reaching largely datadriven convergence: a Kalman filter is first used to generate the residual innovation sequences without input forces, followed by a recursive leastsquare filter which is derived to use the sequences of residual innovation to compute values of input forces to the myocardium. Finally, myocardial kinematic function can be recovered by using the estimated input forces.
The outline of the paper is as follows. Section 2 describes the underlying myocardial dynamics, that is, the statespace representation of biomechanical model. The combination of the Kalman filter and the recursive leastsquare filter to recover input forces and correct the estimation of myocardial kinematic function is introduced in Section 3. We finally evaluate our algorithm in Section 4 and present the corresponding discussion and conclusion in Section 5.
2. Representation of Myocardial Dynamics
As a rule of thumb, the heart is a complex mechanical system in terms of large deformation and complicated material properties [34]. Many sophisticated models have been built over tremendous experiments to reproduce the behavior of the heart [34]. However, the complexities of these models limit their performance in understanding patient's data because of high computational requirements. Furthermore, some errors of initialization can be accumulated and amplified through the model dynamics because of the deterministic nature of these models. The purpose of this paper is to build a stochastic representation of myocardial dynamics, which relaxes the requirement of complexity and accuracy of the model by introducing uncertainties into the biomechanical model. In the following subsections, a deterministic the finiteelement representation of the myocardium using the law of linear elasticity is built, and then this representation plus its relation of measurement will be converted into stochastic state space equations. The reason to choose linear elasticity in this work is to construct a rationally realistic and computationally feasible analysis framework using imaging data and other available measurements, the structure, dynamics, and material of the myocardium. In the stochastic representation, the model errors, which could be caused by an imperfect model, insufficient discretization, or incorrect initialization, and measurement errors are properly addressed as noise terms in each state space equation. It is noted that other computational cardiac mechanics of materials also can be adopted into this stochastic framework.
2.1. Law of Linear Elasticity
In the current D implementation, we adopt an isotropic linear elastic material property, where the stress and strain relationship obeys Hooke's law [35], to approximate myocardial dynamics:
where is the stress tensor and is the strain tensor.
In the law of mechanical deformation, the infinitesimal strain tensor or Cauchy's strain tensor will be used to describe the deformation of an object with elastic material properties [35]. The infinitesimal strain tensor is calculated by
where is the displacement along axis and is the displacement along axis in location . In our D implementation, the plane strain condition is assumed. So the material constitutive matrix is
where is Young's modulus and is Poisson's ratio [35]. In previous work [36], the values of these two myocardial material variables are specified as kpa and . In the following subsection, the finiteelement representation, numerical discretization of the myocardium will be built using the material constitutive law established in the following subsection.
2.2. FiniteElement Mesh of Myocardium
where , , and are the mass, damping, and stiffness matrices, respectively, is the load vector, and is the displacement vector. Also is a known function of material density and is assumed temporally constant for incompressible material, is a function of material constitutive law, and is related to Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio which are again assumed constant. Finally, is frequency dependent, and we assume Rayleigh damping with small constant and for the low damping myocardial tissue [35].
We need to point out that the input forces , which are driven by electrical excitations and blood pressure, of the cardiac system are highly complicated. In clinical practice, observations of intraventricular blood pressures are too sparse and noisy. In spite of many efforts which are aimed to recover intracardiac electrical excitations from body surface potentials [39], the coupling of electrical excitations and active forces remain unknown in clinical practice because of difficulties. So it is a good strategy to assume the whole input forces to the cardiac system are a Gaussian random variable, which represents the unobservable nature. The uncertainties of input forces could be removed or reduced if new observations of input forces can be reliably collected in clinical practice in the future. In the ideal case, where the input forces are fully known, the leastsquare filter will vanish, and the Kalman filter will be able to recover the motion from images directly.
2.3. Continuous StateSpace Equations
where is the process noise which is an additive, zeromean, white noise ( ; , where is the process noise covariance). The input forces , the system matrices and are
the matrices and are not the same as the works in [21, 24] because we modify them for the estimation of input forces.
where is the measurement noise which is additive, zero mean, and white ( ; , where is the measurement noise covariance), independent of . Also, is the measurement matrix which should be specified by the relation between state vector and measurement vector .
The process noise in (5) and the measurement noise in (7) are crucial in our stochastic approach. For example, linear elasticity is used in this work to approximate the dynamics of the myocardium. However, it is not the most realistic material model for myocardial dynamics. The distance between linear elasticity and real myocardial dynamics will contribute to the process noise in (5), as uncertainties in model. Other errors, such as discretization and initialization, also can be treated as uncertainties in computational model, that is, the process noise in (5). How to obtain the proper process noise is still a great challenge and active topic in many statespace approaches [40]. So is the measurement noise. The process noise and the measurement noise are adjusted manually in this work because the aim of this work is to establish a proper stochastic framework to address the issue of input forces. However, it is worthy to explore the properties and effects of the process noise and the measurement noise of this framework in future work.
2.4. Discrete StateSpace Equations
The MR images are usually collected distinctly over the whole cardiac cycle, so (7) should be discretized according to corresponding imaging instants. However, (5) also needs to be discretized so that it can be run in a computer. It should be noted that the continuousdiscrete Kalman filter has been proposed to recover continuous myocardial kinematic function in [41]. However, the state equation is still discretized in a very small time step to approximate the effect of continuous dynamics in [41]. We discretize (5) and (7) over the imaging sampling interval . Since the imaging sampling interval is always a known constant, we can replace with in
and can be computed using Pade approximation [42]. The mathematical derivation of discrete statespace equations from continuous statespace equations is provided in [21]. Here if there are sample nodes to represent the myocardium, is a matrix, is a matrix, is a vector and is a vector.
2.5. Discrete StateSpace Equations with Noisy Input Forces
where and are the additive, zeromean, white noises, but independent from each other. As can be seen in (10), the uncertainties in input forces are modeled by putting and together. So the input forces are disturbed by the noise , which represents the unobservable nature of the input force. Though the dynamic of state is driven by the unobservable input forces now, we will provide an additional leastsquare filter to estimate the input forces and correct the estimation of state .
3. Simultaneous Estimation of Myocardial Motion and Input Forces
To handle unknown input forces in (10), we propose a framework of simultaneous estimation of myocardial kinematic function and input forces, which consists of two parts: a Kalman filter and a recursive leastsquare filter. Let , , and denote the prediction of the true state without the input forces , the estimation of the true state without the input forces , and the estimation of the true state with the input forces , respectively. Then our proposed framework can be summarized below:
Prediction without input forces:
Update with measurements:
where the covariance of residual innovation sequence is .
Estimation of input forces:
Correction with input forces:
The detailed derivation of steps and can be found in the appendix of [33] However is the error covariance matrix of the Kalman filter without information of input forces, is the residual innovation covariance, is the Kalman gain, and are the sensitivity matrices, is the residual innovation, is the error covariance of the estimated input vector , and is the correction gain for the updating . Also, , , , and are a matrix, a matrix, a matrix, a matrix, and a matrix, respectively, if there are nodes in the triangular mesh of the myocardium. When , we will get the usual sequential leastsquare estimator, which is only suitable for a constant input force system. In the system with timevarying input forces, however, we like to prevent from reducing to zero. This is accomplished by introducing the factor . By setting , is effectively prevented from shrinking to zero. Hence, the corresponding leastsquare filter can preserve its updating ability continuously. However, the inherent data truncation effect brought by causes variance increases in in the estimation problem resulting from noise. Thus, it is necessary to compromise between fast adaptive capability and the loss of estimate accuracy.
Here, the Kalman filter is used to generate , , and , based on the state transition matrix , input matrix , and process and measurement noise covariance matrices and . The leastsquare filter is derived to compute the onset time histories of the unknown input forces by utilizing the Kalman gain, residual innovation covariance , and residual innovation . In addition, our framework is initialized by setting , , and . Since and are normally assumed, where is the identity matrix, and are the constant scalar, we initialize and as large numbers, such as and , respectively. This has the effect of treating the errors in the initial estimation of the input forces as large. However, after a few time steps, the estimation results should converge to their actual values rapidly if the statespace equations can capture the system dynamics quickly. This also shows that the present technique is not sensitive to the errors in the initial estimation. Though and should be determined according to the noise level in the input forces and measurements, it is adjusted manually in this work according to empirical experiences.
4. Experiments
4.1. Synthetic Data
Our filtering strategy is first validated in synthetic data of a 2D object undergoing body forces only in the vertical direction ( axis) with the bottom being fixed. The magnitude of body forces in each triangular element is decided by the area of that element by setting the density of body forces to 1 Newton. Material properties and other parameters are taken as Young's modulus kpa, Poisson's ratio , damping coefficients and . The simulation is generated by a general purpose finiteelement software, Abaqus. However sampling frames of the motion are acquired, with displacements and velocities in all nodes, as the ground truth. Then Gaussian noises (20 dB) are added in all nodes to generate noisy measurements. A single Kalman filter (KL) and our framework of the Kalman filter and the leastsquare filter (KLLS) are implemented for the estimation of kinematic function. In KL implementation, the nodal displacements with noise in the top of the synthetic object are used to construct input forces through the penalty method, which is the same as the work in [21]. The setting of process noise and measurement noise is the same in KL and KLLS in order to maintain a fair comparison, where and . In KLLS, is set to 0.82. The displacement magnitude and strain maps of the ground truth and the estimated results for quantitative assessments and comparisons of two filtering strategies are shown in Figure 3. Overall pointbypoint positional errors are measured by their mean and standard deviation. The mean is calculated by
where is the number of nodes, Est is the estimated nodal value and Tru is the true nodal value. The standard deviation is calculated by
Differences between the ground truth and the KL/KLLS estimated nodal positions.
Method  Frame number  Maximum error  Mean error  Standard deviation 

KL  number 4  0.181  0.063  0.036 
number 8  0.146  0.074  0.037  
number 12  0.168  0.086  0.043  
number 16  0.258  0.104  0.060  
number 20  0.227  0.120  0.062  
KLLS  number 4  0.067  0.021  0.017 
number 8  0.072  0.026  0.021  
number 12  0.083  0.013  0.024  
number 16  0.093  0.031  0.028  
number 20  0.114  0.044  0.036 
Comparison of the magnitude to total nodal forces between ground truth and estimation (KLLS).
Frame number  Ground truth  Estimated result 

number 4 


number 8 


number 12 


number 16 


number 20 


4.2. Canine Image Data
5. Conclusion
In this paper, we have presented a biomechanically constrained filtering framework for the multiframe estimation of the nonrigid cardiac kinematics from medical image sequence. In spite of linear elasticity used to approximate myocardial system dynamics, our framework could allow convenient incorporation of other material constraints. The input estimation filtering formulation facilitates the considerations of input data uncertainty, and the Kalman filtering principles are adopted to achieve optimal estimation of the myocardial kinematics over corrected input forces. Quantitative validation has been conducted using synthetic data with known ground truth, and physiological experiment results are acquired from MR image sequences, as validated by postmortem tissue staining.
The conventional Kalman filtering strategy consists of two steps: prediction and correction. The successful place of the conventional Kalman filtering strategy is computing the estimated state variables between predictions and measurements in minimum mean square sense. However, the predictions generated by the model could be faulty if the input term of the model is wrongly added, and then the error of estimations could be dominated by the imperfect predictions. In the case of myocardial dynamics, it will demand arduous work, including tremendous experiments, to determine patient's loading condition, which is not feasible in daily clinical practice. So it is reasonable to treat the loading, that is, input forces, of the heart as stochastic sources. In our particular application, it can be easily seen that the response of the cardiac system will vary largely with different loading conditions from (4). The forces constructed from boundaries or image features are obviously different from the real situation in the myocardium and a minor error from these imagederived forces could be amplified by (4) easily. Since the patientspecific observations of input forces in the cardiac system are still unavailable, it is meaningful to handle the uncertainties in input forces and measurements simultaneously, which can increase the accuracies of estimated state variables if estimated input forces are closed to ground truth.
Though this approach is inspired by [33] from the heating problem, it is closely related with previous state space approaches [21, 30, 41]. Works like [21, 30, 41] could be considered as one special situation of our approach where leastsquare filter vanishes if the external loading can be specified deterministically. The demanding computation also prohibits the performance of our filtering strategy in 3D because of burdensome computation of the Kalman filter and extra calculation of the leastsquare filter. Since the computation of the conventional 3D Kalman filter could be properly reduced by applying model reduction [25] or reduced rank filter [45], it will be worthy to apply similar techniques in our work. Further, the material properties of the biomechanical models may be estimated along with the motion properties through the augmentation of the state vector by the material parameters and the construction of the nonlinear augmented statespace representation [24].
Declarations
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by The Wellcome Trust Fund. The authors would like to extend their gratitude to Dr. Albert Sinusas of Yale University for the canine experiment and imaging data. The valuable comments and suggestions from the anonymous reviewers are also greatly appreciated.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Amartu SC, Vesselle HJ: A new approach to study cardiac motion: the optical flow of cine MR images. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1993, 29(1):5967. 10.1002/mrm.1910290112View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 LedesmaCarbayo MJ, Kybic J, Desco M, et al.: Spatiotemporal nonrigid registration for ultrasound cardiac motion estimation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2005, 24(9):11131126.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Song S, Leahy R: Computation of 3D velocity fields from. 3D cine CT images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1991, 10(3):295306. 10.1109/42.97579View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Amini AA, Chen Y, Elayyadi M, Radeva P: Tag surface reconstruction and tracking of myocardial beads from SPAMMMRI with parametric bspline surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2001, 20(2):94103. 10.1109/42.913176View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Denney TS: Estimation and detection of myocardial tags in MR image without userdefined myocardial contours. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1999, 18(4):330344. 10.1109/42.768842View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Guttman MA, Prince JL, McVeigh ER: Tag and contour detection in tagged MR images of the left ventricle. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1994, 13(1):7488. 10.1109/42.276146View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Amini AA, Duncan JS: Bending and stretching models for LV wall motion analysis from curves and surfaces. Image and Vision Computing 1992, 10(6):418430. 10.1016/02628856(92)90027ZView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Shi PC, Sinusas AJ, Constable RT, Ritman E, Duncan JS: Pointtracked quantitative analysis of left ventricular surface motion from 3D image sequences. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2000, 19(1):3650. 10.1109/42.832958View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 McEachen JC II, Duncan JS: Shapebased tracking of left ventricular wall motion. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1997, 16(3):270283. 10.1109/42.585761View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Pelc NJ, Drangova M, Pelc LR, et al.: Tracking of cyclical motion using phase contrast cine MRI velocity data. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1995, 5: 339345. 10.1002/jmri.1880050319View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Huang J, Abendschein D, DavilaRoman VG, Amini AA: Spatiotemporal tracking of myocardial deformations with a 4D Bspline model from tagged MRI. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1999, 18(10):957972. 10.1109/42.811299View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Denney TS, Prince JL: Reconstruction of 3D left ventricular motion from planar tagged cardiac MR images: an estimation theoretic approach. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1995, 14(4):625635. 10.1109/42.476104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Benayoun S, Ayache N: Dense nonrigid motion estimation in sequences of medical images using differential constraints. International Journal of Computer Vision 1998, 26(1):2540. 10.1023/A:1007932523504View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Pentland AP, Horowitz B: Recovery of nonrigid motion and structure. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1991, 13(7):730742. 10.1109/34.85661View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Sclaroff S, Pentland AP: Modal matching for correspondence and recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1995, 17(6):545561. 10.1109/34.387502View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Constable RT, Shi PC, Sinusas A, Duncan J: Volumetric deformation analysis using mechanicsbased data fusion: applications in cardiac motion recovery. International Journal of Computer Vision 1999, 35(1):87107. 10.1023/A:1008163112590View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Dione DP, Constable RT, Papademetris X, Sinusas AJ, Duncan JS: Estimation of 3D left ventricular deformation from echocardiography. Medical Image Analysis 2001, 5: 1728. 10.1016/S13618415(00)000220View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Dione DP, Constable RT, Papademetris X, Sinusas AJ, Duncan JS: Estimation of 3D left ventricular deformation from medical images using biomechanical models. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2002, 21(7):786799. 10.1109/TMI.2002.801163View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Duncan JS, Ayache N: Medical image analysis: progress over two decades and the challenges ahead. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2000, 22(1):85106. 10.1109/34.824822View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Viergever MA: Threedimensional modeling for functional analysis of cardiac images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2001, 20(1):225. 10.1109/42.906421View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Liu HF, Shi PC: Statespace analysis of cardiac motion with biomechanical constraints. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2007, 16(4):901917.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 BarSharlom Y, Li X, Kirubarajan T: Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 2000.Google Scholar
 Liu HF, Shi PC: Cardiac motion and elasticity characterization with iterative sequential hinfinity criteria. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention 2004, 3442.Google Scholar
 Shi PC, Liu HF: Stochastic finite element framework for simultaneous estimation of cardiac kinematic functions and material parameters. Medical Image Analysis 2003, 7(4):445464. 10.1016/S13618415(03)000665MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wong KCL, Wang L, Zhang H, Liu HF, Shi PC: Computational complexity reduction for volumetric cardiac deformation recovery. Journal of Signal Processing Systems 2009, 55(1–3):281296.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Moireau P, Chapelle D, Le Tallec P: Filtering for distributed mechanical systems using position measurements: perspectives in medical imaging. Inverse Problems 2009, 25(3):25.Google Scholar
 Moireau P, Chapelle D, Le Tallec P: Joint state and parameter estimation for distributed mechanical systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008, 197(6–8):659677.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Chapelle D, Moireau P: Robus filter for joint stateparameters estimation in distributed mechanical system. Discrete and Continous Dynamical Systems 2009, 23(12):6584.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 Ljung L: Asymptotic behavior of the extended kalman filter as a parameter estimator for linear systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1979, 24(1):3650.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
 Wong CL, Zhang HY, Shi PC: Physiome model based statespace framework for cardiac kinematics recovery. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention 2006, 720727.Google Scholar
 Sermesant M, Delingette H, Ayache N: An electromechanical model of the heart for image analysis and simulation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2006, 25(5):612625.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Hu ZH, Metaxas D, Axel L: Invivo strain and stress estimation of the left ventricle from MRI images. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention 2002, 706713.Google Scholar
 Tuan PC, Ji CC, Fong LW, Huang WT: An input estimation approach to online twodimensional inverse heat conduction problems. Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B 1996, 29(3):345363. 10.1080/10407799608914986View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Glass L, Hunter P, McCulloch A: Theory of Heart: Biomechanics, Biophysics, and Nonlinear Dynamics of Cardiac Function. Springer, New York, NY, USA; 1991.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Bathe KJ: Finite Element Procedures. PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA; 1996.MATHGoogle Scholar
 Yamada H: Strength of Biological Material. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA; 1970.Google Scholar
 Wong LN, Liu HF, Sinusas AJ, Shi PC: Simultaneous recovery of left ventricular shape and motion using meshfree particle framework. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2004 12631266.Google Scholar
 Li B, Young AA, Cowan BR: Validation of GPU accelerated nonrigid registration for the evaluation of cardiac function. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention 2008, 880887.Google Scholar
 Wang LW, Zhang HY, Wong KCL, Liu HF, Shi PC: Noninvasive imaging of 3D cardiac electrophysiology. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2006 632635.Google Scholar
 Lermusiaux PFJ: Adaptive modeling, adaptive data assimilation and adaptive sampling. Physica D 2007, 230(12):172196. 10.1016/j.physd.2007.02.014MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
 Wong CL, Zhang HY, Shi PC: Cardiac motion recovery: continuous dynamics, discrete measurements, and optimal estimation. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention 2006, 744751.Google Scholar
 Golub GH, Van Loan CF: Matrix Computation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md, USA; 1983.MATHGoogle Scholar
 Glad T, Ljung L: Control Theory. Taylor & Francis, London, UK; 2000.Google Scholar
 Haber E, Metaxas DN, Axel L: Motion analysis of the right ventricle from MRI images. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention 1998, 177188.Google Scholar
 Pham DT, Verron J, Roubaud MC: Singular evolutive extended kalman filter with eof initialization for data assimilation in oceanography. Journal of Marine Systems 1998, 16(34):323340. 10.1016/S09247963(97)001097View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.