- Research
- Open Access
Efficient phase estimation for the classification of digitally phase modulated signals using the cross-WVD: a performance evaluation and comparison with the S-transform
- Chee Yen Mei^{1}Email author,
- Ahmad Zuri Sha'ameri^{1} and
- Boualem Boashash^{2, 3}
https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-6180-2012-65
© Mei et al; licensee Springer. 2012
Received: 15 June 2011
Accepted: 16 March 2012
Published: 16 March 2012
Abstract
This article presents a novel algorithm based on the cross-Wigner-Ville Distribution (XWVD) for optimum phase estimation within the class of phase shift keying signals. The proposed method is a special case of the general class of cross time-frequency distributions, which can represent the phase information for digitally phase modulated signals, unlike the quadratic time-frequency distributions. An adaptive window kernel is proposed where the window is adjusted using the localized lag autocorrelation function to remove most of the undesirable duplicated terms. The method is compared with the S-transform, a hybrid between the short-time Fourier transform and wavelet transform that has the property of preserving the phase of the signals as well as other key signal characteristics. The peak of the time-frequency representation is used as an estimator of the instantaneous information bearing phase. It is shown that the adaptive windowed XWVD (AW-XWVD) is an optimum phase estimator as it meets the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) at signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 5 dB for both binary phase shift keying and quadrature phase shift keying. The 8 phase shift keying signal requires a higher threshold of about 7 dB. In contrast, the S-transform never meets the CRLB for all range of SNR and its performance depends greatly on the signal's frequency. On the average, the difference in the phase estimate error between the S-transform estimate and the CRLB is approximately 20 dB. In terms of symbol error rate, the AW-XWVD outperforms the S-transform and it has a performance comparable to the conventional detector. Thus, the AW-XWVD is the preferred phase estimator as it clearly outperforms the S-transform.
Keywords
- adaptive windowed cross Wigner-Ville distribution
- optimum phase estimator
- instantaneous information bearing phase
- Phase Shift Keying; S-transform
- Cramer-Rao lower bound
- time-frequency analysis
1. Phase shift keying signals and the problem of phase estimation
Phase shift keying (PSK) is commonly used [1] due to better noise immunity and bandwidth efficiency compared to amplitude shift keying (ASK) and frequency shift keying (FSK) modulations [2]. This is reflected in current wireless communication technologies such as 3G, CDMA, WiMax, WiFi, and the 4G technologies that employ PSK modulation [3]. In addition, digital phase modulation is also used in HF data communication such as in PACTOR II/III, CLOVER 2000, STANAG 4285, and MIL STD 188-110A/B format [4]. The instantaneous information bearing phase (IIB-phase) in the class of PSK signal represents the transmitted symbol, the signal symbol duration, and class of PSK modulation scheme used. This information is useful to classify and demodulate signals.
1.1. Phase estimation and signal demodulation
Several phase estimation methods are proposed for PSK signal demodulation, interference cancellation, coherent communication over time-varying channels, and direction of arrival estimation [5–12]. Such phase estimation methods can be classified as coherent and non-coherent detections [13]. The coherent detector is often referred to as a maximum likelihood detector [13]. The term non-coherent refers to a detection scheme where the reference signal is not necessary to be in phase with the received signal. One of the earliest contributions for the phase estimation of binary phase shift keying (BPSK) signal is an optimum phase estimator which derives a reference signal from the received data itself using Costas loop [5]. In [6], an open loop phase estimation method for burst transmission is proposed. The phase-locked loop (PLL) method used in conventional time-division multiple access system is inefficient due to the very long acquisition time. This problem is resolved using the new method proposed in this article which yields an identical performance with the PLL method. However, the frequency uncertainty problem degrades the performance of the estimator. In order to overcome this degradation, an improved algorithm which includes the frequency and phase offset is proposed in [7, 8]. By estimating the frequency and phase offset, the performance degradation caused by the frequency offset in [6] is eliminated. The work reported in [9–11] proposed a carrier phase estimator for orthogonal frequency division multiple access systems based on the expectation-maximization algorithm to overcome the computational burden of the likelihood function. This method is actually equivalent to the maximum likelihood phase estimation using an iterative method without any prior knowledge of the phase. Two practical M-PSK phase detector structures for carrier synchronization PLLs were reported in [12]. These two new non-data-aided phase detector structures are known as the self-normalizing modification of the M th-order nonlinearity detector and the adaptive gain detector [12]. Both detectors show improvement in phase error variance due to automatic gain control circuit imperfections.
1.2. Phase estimation and signal classification
All the above-mentioned methods aimed to develop an optimal phase estimator solely for signal demodulation without estimation of instantaneous parameters of the signals. The Costas loop and PLL are crucial for carrier recovery and synchronization in the demodulation of the class of PSK signals [5–8]. However, our applications focused on the analysis and classification of signals for spectrum monitoring. The main objective of such a system [14] is to determine the signal parameters such as the carrier frequency, signal power, modulation type, modulation parameters, symbol rate, and data format which are then used as input to a classifier network. This system is used by the military for intelligence gathering [15] and by the regulatory bodies [16] for verifying conformance to spectrum allocation. Recently, similar requirements were identified for spectrum sensing in cognitive radio [17] to determine channel occupancy and dynamically allocate channels to the various users. Spectrum monitoring systems also use data demodulation [14], but with modems tailored for the specific modulation type and data format.
Since PSK signals are time-varying in phase, time-frequency analysis [[1]8, p. 9] can be used to estimate the signal's instantaneous parameters. The development of signal dependent kernels for time-frequency distribution (TFD) applicable to the class of ASK and FSK signal was proposed in [19]. Further enhancement in [20] improved the time-frequency representation (TFR) by estimating the kernel parameters using the localized lag autocorrelation (LLAC) function. Recent study has proven that the quadratic TFD [21, 22] is capable to analyze and classify the class of ASK and FSK signals at very low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) conditions (-2 dB). However, the loss of the phase information in the bilinear product computation makes it impractical to completely represent the PSK class of signals. Since PSK signals are characterized by the phase, cross time-frequency distributions (XTFD) based method is proposed as it is capable of representing the signal phase information [23]. Just like the quadratic TFD which suffers from the effect of cross terms, there are unwanted terms known as "duplicated terms"^{a} which are present in the XTFD. Preliminary work on the XTFD shows that a fixed window is insufficient to generate an accurate IIB-phase estimation [23], thus justifying the need for an adaptive window.
This article presents a time-frequency analysis solution to the optimum phase estimation of PSK class of signals and then evaluates its performance. Signals tested are BPSK, QPSK, and 8PSK signals. The first method is based on the localized adaptive windowed cross Wigner-Ville distribution (AW-XWVD). In this method, the adaptation of the window width is based on the LLAC function of the signals of interest. For comparison, a second method is selected that is based on the S-transform [24]. It is an invertible time-frequency spectral localization technique that combines elements of the Wavelet transform (WT) and the short-time Fourier transform (STFT). This S-transform is selected for comparison as it has the property of preserving the phase of a signal as well as retaining other key characteristics such as energy localization and instantaneous frequency [24].
This correspondence is organized as follows. Section 2 first describes the signal models used in this article and introduces the general representations of the quadratic TFDs, XTFD, and S-transform. Section 3 presents the general equations for cross bilinear product in time-lag domain for both auto-terms and duplicated terms together with the LLAC algorithm for estimating the adaptive window for the PSK class signals. Next, we present the method for IIB-phase using the peak of the AW-XWVD and S-transform. The Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) which is used for bench marking purposes is discussed in the following subsection. Section 4 presents the discrete time implementation of both method and the performance comparison of the AW-XWVD with the S-transform in the presence of noise. The criteria of comparison are based on the TFR, constellation diagram, main-lobe width (MLW) and the phase estimate variance. Then, a comparison in terms of the computational complexity and symbol error rate is given. Conclusions are given in the following section. Throughout this article, we use the following terminology: TFDs represent the mathematical formulations for distributing the signal energy in both time and frequency; the actual representations obtained are called TFRs.
2. PSK Signals Model and TFRs
This section first introduces the model and the parameters for the PSK signals. It then describes the time-frequency analysis techniques used to represent and analyze the signals.
2.1. Signal model
where φ(t) is the IIB-phase which is very crucial in defining digitally phase modulated signals as it contains information of the transmitted data. This article evaluates the comparative performance of the AW-XWVD as an estimator of the IIB-phase for BPSK, QPSK, and 8PSK signals and then compares the results with the S-transform as both methods claimed to provide accurate phase representation. Note that this study does not include the class of quadrature amplitude modulation signals (QAM). Even though this signal has IIB-phase, its time-varying amplitude characteristic is not suitable for the adaptation algorithm described in this article (see Section 3.1.2). The algorithm is developed based on the assumption of constant amplitude signal such as the class of PSK signals.
Signal model parameters defined within a symbol duration
Signal | Normalized frequency (Hz) | Symbol duration (s) | Phase mapping |
---|---|---|---|
BPSK1 | 1/16 | f_{ s }/80 | ϕ_{ k }(t) = π for s = 1 ϕ_{ k }(t) = 0 for s = 0 |
BPSK2 | 1/8 | ||
QPSK1 | 1/16 | f_{ s }/80 | ϕ_{ k }(t) = π/4 for s = 11 ϕ_{ k }(t) = 3π/4 for s = 01 ϕ_{ k }(t) = 5π/4 for s = 00 ϕ_{ k }(t) = 7π/4 for s = 10 |
QPSK2 | 1/8 | ||
8PSK1 | 1/16 | f_{ s }/80 | ϕ_{ k }(t) = π/8 for s = 000 ϕ_{ k }(t) = 3π/8 for s = 001 ϕ_{ k }(t) = 5π/8 for s = 010 ϕ_{ k }(t) = 7π/8 for s = 011 ϕ_{ k }(t) = 9π/8 for s = 100 ϕ_{ k }(t) = 11π/8 for s = 101 ϕ_{ k }(t) = 13π/8 for s = 110 ϕ_{ k }(t) = 15π/8 for s = 111 |
8PSK2 | 1/8 |
where z(t) is the noiseless PSK signal and v(t) is the complex-valued additive white Gaussian noise. The noise has independent and identically distributed real and imaginary parts with total variance ${\sigma}_{v}^{\text{2}}$ and zero mean [[18], p. 437].
2.2. TFDs, cross TFDs, and S-transform
The quadratic TFD is a useful technique to analyze time-varying signals, but the resulting TFR does not represent phase directly. Due to the need to estimate IIB-phase in PSK signals, the XTFD and the S-transform are introduced for this purpose as both can represent phase in the time-frequency domain.
2.2.1. Quadratic TFDs and cross TFDs
But it does not contain IIB-phase. A box function is used in the representation of the reference signal to keep track of the location of interaction between the signals of interest with the reference signal in the time-lag representation. Similar study presented in [30, 31] on the use of XWVD for IF estimate of linear FM signals requires a reference signal identical to the signal of interest. However, this is not necessary for this application since the reference signal required is a pure sinusoid with the same frequency as the signal of interest. Hence, any power spectrum estimation method [[32], p. 214] can be used to determine the frequency of the received signal. From there, a pure sinusoid reference signal of the same frequency is generated. This article assumes that the signal of interest is in perfect synchronization with the reference signal. In practical applications, the presence of phase synchronization error introduces an offset in the IIB-phase. This phase offset could be compensated using a PLL or Costas loop [33] to generate the reference signal. Furthermore, the computation of the XTFD is done based on a segment of received signal. Combining the features of the PLL and Costas loop is only possible if the XTFD is computed iteratively one sample at a time.
Since the time component is a delta function, this kernel is independent of the Doppler variable and only a function of lag. The kernel is known as Doppler-independent kernel [[18], p. 71], a special case of separable kernel. It is shown that such kernel applies one-dimensional filtering and is adapted to only a particular kind of mono-component signals such as nonlinear FM signals [[18], p. 214].Windowing is performed in the lag direction before taking the Fourier transform. Thus, the choice of separable kernel in Equation (10) causes smoothing only in the frequency direction.
The lag window function w(τ) can be one of the window functions typically used in filter design or spectrum analysis.
2.2.2. The S-transform
3. Phase estimation methodology
This section describes the characteristics of the cross bilinear product in the time-lag representation and outlines the derivation of the AW-XWVD. The adaptation method used to set up the localized lag adaptive window is then discussed. Next, the method used for phase estimation from the peak of the TFR is presented.
3.1. AW-XWVD
The S-transform can be applied directly to the class of PSK signals to obtain the TFR without any modification in the algorithm. However, this is not the case with the XTFD where interference due to duplicated terms is introduced in the TFR [23]. Previous study defined methods to determine optimum windows for TFDs [38, 39] that can reduce cross terms. A window matching algorithm [39] is used to determine the optimum window for a TFD at all time instant. The algorithm iteratively evaluates the localized energy distribution to minimize the error between successive window estimates. The concept of time-frequency coherence is introduced in [38] where the XWVD and WVD for each signal components are used in its computation. The required window function is estimated based on the autoregressive moving average modeling and Karhunen Loeve expansion. In this PSK communication application, the cross bilinear product has a certain pattern that can be utilized in computing the optimum window. Therefore, the adaptive window is designed based on the characteristics of the cross bilinear product. The resulting distribution, the AW-XWVD, can generate an accurate TFR and the subsequent IIB-phase estimate.
3.1.1. The cross bilinear product
The proofs for Equations (16) and (17) are given in Appendix 1.
In practical digital communication applications, the amplitude of the signal might not be ideally constant due to channel impairments such as multipath fading, attenuation by the propagation channel and any kind of amplification performed by the circuits at both the transmitter and receiver [13]. Therefore, the variable A is retained throughout the derivation of the cross bilinear product. Other than that, signals that combine amplitude and phase modulations such as QAM can also be used provided a suitable adaptation algorithm for the XTFD is designed. The variation in the amplitude, A, caused by the transmitted binary data will correspond to the variation in the energy represented in the XTFR.
The interaction of the auto-terms and duplicated terms can be visualized as the addition of multiple vector components which result in a new vector component with different magnitude and phase. Instead of IIB-phase of φ_{2} which is caused by the auto-terms, the resulting IIB-phase consists of the interaction between all the phase terms φ_{1} and φ_{3} caused by the duplicated terms.
where ς is the time instant in lag and |R_{ KK }(t, ς)| is the amplitude of the LLAC which will be discussed in the following section. Note that the rectangular window was used for simplicity as we observed that the proposed methodology performance is not affected significantly by the choice of the window shape.
3.1.2. Adaptation algorithm
A higher value of the amplitude of the LLAC function implies that the similarity is high and vice versa. The miscorrelation in the signal is indicated by a drastic drop in the amplitude of the LLAC function. The LLAC function will give a value approaching unity at lag instant, ς = 0.
Minimum Value of LLAC for various frequencies
Number | Signal frequency (Hz) | Min |R_{ KK }(t, ς)| |
---|---|---|
1 | 1/32 | 0.567 |
2 | 1/16 | 0.251 |
3 | 1/8 | 0.121 |
4 | 1/4 | 0.089 |
3.2. IIB-phase estimation from the peak of TFDs
By extending the approach used for IF estimation from the peak of WVD presented in [26], the IIB-phase is estimated frrm the peak of the AW-XWVD and S-transform as outlined in the following sections.
3.2.1. IIB-phase estimation using the AW-XWVD
The detailed derivation of the above equation is given in Appendix 3.
3.2.2. IIB-phase estimation using the S-transform
The detailed derivation for IIB-phase estimation using S-transform is given in Appendix 4.
3.3. Comparison to CRLB
This section compares the performance of both AW-XWVD and S-transform as a phase estimator with the CRLB which is often used as a benchmark [41], as it gives the theoretical lower limit to the variance of any unbiased parameter estimator [42]. The CRLB derived in [43, 44] uses a likelihood function on a known signal in the presence of additive white noise for the digitally phase modulated signal.
where N is the total number of samples, ${\widehat{\varphi}}_{n}$ is the estimated phase at every time sample n, and $\stackrel{\u0304}{\varphi}$ is the actual IIB-phase.
3.4. PSK signal detection algorithm
4. Implementation, results, and discussions
This section discusses the implementation and realization of the TFDs as well as the performance comparison between the AW-XWVD and S-transform from several measures. First, comparison is made in terms of the TFR plot, the slice of the TFR, the IIB-phase, the instantaneous energy, and the constellation diagram. Then, comparison in terms of the MLW is discussed. Next, the performance of the AW-XWVD and S-transform as a phase estimator is benchmarked to the CRLB. This is followed by the evaluation of the symbol error rate performance of the AW-XWVD, S-transform, and conventional detector. Finally, a comparison is made in terms of the computational complexity between the AW-XWVD, S-transform, and conventional detector.
4.1. Discrete-time formulation and implementation
The discrete time representation of the S-transform is similar to the spectrogram. However, there is a tradeoff between the time and frequency resolution for the S-transform as the window width is frequency dependent.
4.2. Results
Performance comparison between AW-XWVD and S-transform
SNR | Signals | MLW (Hz) | |
---|---|---|---|
AW-XWVD | S-Transform | ||
6 dB | BPSK1 | 0.012 | 0.025 |
BPSK2 | 0.012 | 0.053 | |
QPSK1 | 0.016 | 0.025 | |
QPSK2 | 0.015 | 0.046 | |
8PSK1 | 0.017 | 0.031 | |
8PSK2 | 0.017 | 0.052 | |
10 dB | BPSK1 | 0.010 | 0.023 |
BPSK2 | 0.010 | 0.049 | |
QPSK1 | 0.014 | 0.024 | |
QPSK2 | 0.014 | 0.0486 | |
8PSK1 | 0.015 | 0.029 | |
8PSK2 | 0.014 | 0.050 |
The IIB-phase plot shows that the AW-XWVD gives better accuracy for the IIB-phase estimate. For the S-transform, distortion is observed in the IIB-phase estimate at the phase transition regions which is absent in the AW-XWVD. The sliding window in the S-transform causes distortion in the IIB-phase at the symbol transition region due to the interaction between adjacent symbols. Since digitally phase modulated signals have constant amplitude, their instantaneous energy should also be constant at all times. However, due to noise, the amplitude of the signal appears to vary. This is reflected as variation in the magnitude of the instantaneous energy for AW-XWVD and S-transform. A significant drop is observed in the instantaneous energy for the S-transform at every symbol transition. Similar to the phase, this drop is caused by the interactions between the adjacent symbols within the sliding window. Since the AW-XWVD produces accurate instantaneous energy and IIB-phase estimates, the constellation diagram generated shows almost no variation from the original points and is better compared to the S-transform. Table 3 shows the MLW estimated at SNR of 6and 10 dB using both methods. In general, the SNR has no significant effect in the MLW obtained for both methods. However, the effect of signal frequency is more significant for the S-transform compared to the AW-XWVD. For instance, the MLW for both BPSK1 and BPSK2 with the AW-XWVD based estimate is the same at 0.012 Hz. However, for the S-transform the MLW is larger for BPSK2 than BPSK1 with a difference of 0.028 Hz. The scaling of the Gaussian window results in a broader MLW for higher-frequency signal. The signal modulation level has no significant effect on the MLW. This is shown by the MLW measured for BPSK, QPSK, and 8PSK signals where there are only minor differences. These results imply that the AW-XWVD gives better IIB-phase estimation results compared to the S-transform as the performance of an estimator is associated with the MLW [[46], p. 50].
4.3. Variance comparison with the CRLB
4.4. Symbol error rate performance
4.5. Computation complexity
- 1.
Computation of the cross bilinear product to obtain its time-lag representation requires N_{ τ }N multiplications. Ideally, the number of computation for the cross bilinear product is N^{2} where the lag and time durations are equal to N samples. To maintain equal frequency resolution for N > 512 samples, the duration in lag is maintained at N_{ τ } = 512 samples. By limiting the duration in lag, excessive computation of the cross bilinear product is avoided.
- 2.
The LLAC uses an analysis window of N_{ A } which slides along the lag axis at every lag sample for a total of N_{ τ } samples. Since there are N time instances, the total number of multiplications for the computation of localized lag autocorrelation function is N_{ A }N_{ τ }N.
- 3.
The LLAC will determine the separation interval between the auto-terms and duplicated terms based on the average lag window width N_{ w }. For N time samples, the total number of multiplications to setup the adaptive lag window based on the average lag window width N_{ w } is N_{ w }N.
- 4.
To get the XTFR, the Fourier transform of the windowed cross bilinear product is calculated in the lag direction with (N_{ τ } log_{2} N_{ τ }) multiplications. For signal length N, the total number of multiplications 0.5N(N_{ τ } log_{2} N_{ τ }).
Therefore, the total of multiplication required to compute the AW-XWVD is N(N_{ τ } + N_{ A }N_{ τ } + N_{ w } + 0.5N_{ τ } log_{2} N_{ τ }).
- 1.
The product of the frequency-dependent Gaussian window function and the signal of interest to obtain its localized spectrum which requires N multiplications.
- 2.
The Fourier transform of the time-lag representation to obtain the TFR requires 0.5N (N_{ τ } log_{2} N_{ τ }) multiplications.
Thus, the total number of multiplication required to implement the S-transform is N(1 + 0.5N_{ τ } log_{2} N_{ τ }).
- 1.
Mixing of the incoming signal with two sinusoid signals with 90° phase difference requires 2N multiplications.
- 2.
Low pass filtering of the signal to obtain the inphase and quadrature phase component of the signal require 2N multiplications.
Therefore, the total number of multiplications required to implement the conventional detector is 4N.
Comparison of computational complexity between AW-XWVD, S-transform and the conventional detector
Methods of IIB-phase estimation | Number of multiplication per symbol |
---|---|
AW-XWVD | 6.41 × 10^{5} |
S-transform | 1.84 × 10^{5} |
Conventional detector | 3.20 × 10^{2} |
In terms of the number of multiplications, the AW-XWVD requires approximately 4 times more computations compared to the S-transform and 2,000 times more for the conventional detector. Although there is a significant additional number of a computation for the AW-XWVD, recent advances in digital electronics as well as decimation procedures can take care of them; in addition, the performance in terms of the IIB-phase estimates enables more efficient signal parameters estimation in the proposed area of applications. These parameters can be used to classify a signal from a set of reference parameters. If necessary, we can use the IIB-phase estimate to detect PSK signals at low SNR conditions where the conventional detector failed. For higher SNR conditions, it is not necessary to use a technique which is computationally intensive when the symbol error rate is low. Thus, we can setup the conventional detector using the parameters estimated from the IIB-phase to detect PSK signal. So, we conclude that, with the enhancement of current computer processing combined with appropriate decimation procedures, the real-time implementation of AW-XWVD is feasible with the use of multiple processors or parallel processing [48] and the design proposed in [49].
5. Conclusions
A performance comparison between the AW-XWVD and S-transform estimators of IIB-phase shows that the AW-XWVD is superior to the S-transform for classifying PSK signals. Results show that the mean square error of the phase estimate using AW-XWVD is on the average lower by 20 dB. The S-transform has a frequency-dependent window width which performs poorly as a phase estimator for high-frequency signal components. Since peak detection is used for the estimation of the IIB-phase for both methods, the frequency resolution and MLW contribute to the estimation accuracy. The AW-XWVD maintains the frequency resolution through the window adaptation and yields better accuracy for the IIB-phase estimate. It also meets the CRLB at moderate SNR for all the defined signals unlike the S-transform that never meets the bound even at high SNR. For symbol error rate performance, the AW-XWVD is also better compared to the S-transform and it is comparable to the conventional detector at the cost of higher number of computations. Thus, this article has proven that the AW-XWVD is an effective phase estimator for digitally phase modulated signals and can be used for similar applications involving time-varying signals. This study suggests new research directions to pursue in the future, such as replacing the S-transform by a modified S-transform that incorporates an adaptive mechanism; replacing the S-transform by the cross S-transform; using separable kernels in defining a XTFD; and investigate the effect of window shape in Equation (40) on the performance of the phase estimator. These advances can be used in a wide range of signal processing applications from Telecommunications to Biomedicine including EEG and Fetal Movement signals analysis and processing, where time-frequency peak detectors can provide additional features for classification improvement.
Endnote
^{a}The terminology "duplicated terms" is used in this article instead of the cross terms which is typically used in TFA. This is because, in the proposed method, these terms carry the same information as the auto-terms but are shifted in both time and lag. The duplicated terms are caused by the cross bilinear product between the k th and l th symbol of the signal of interest and the reference signal, where k ≠ l.
Appendix 1. Derivation of the auto-terms
The cross bilinear product assembled a rhombic shape and the IAF of the box function given in Equation (18) has a maximum value when they overlap by a copy of itself. This condition applies when the shift in lag is zero. To simplify the notation of the IAF of the box function, the beginning point of each IAF of the box function is determined. For example,
From Equations (A.6) and (A.7), the IAF of the box function can be represented as K_{∏} (t, τ) where this bilinear product begin at t = 0 and τ = 0.
Substitute τ= 0 into the box function,
$\mathrm{\Pi}\left(t-{T}_{b}+\frac{0}{2}\right)\mathrm{\Pi}\left(t-{T}_{b}-\frac{0}{2}\right)=\mathrm{\Pi}\left(t-{T}_{b}\right)\mathrm{\Pi}\left(t-{T}_{b}\right)$ (A.9)
Then, the IAF for box function for the second auto-term can be represented as K_{∏} (t-T_{ b }, τ) where it is shifted by t = T_{ b } in the time domain and shifted by τ = 0 in lag domain.
The above equation shows that all the auto-terms are located along the time axis at τ = 0 and carry the IIB-phase for each symbol. Each individual auto-term has a rhombic shape and begins at t = kT_{ b }.
Appendix 2. Derivation of the duplicated terms
The above indicates that the signal power, frequencies, and IIB-phase for the duplicated terms are the same as the auto-terms except that they are shifted in both time and lag. It has a rhombic shape and it begins at $t=\frac{\left(k+l-2\right){T}_{b}}{2}$ and τ = (l - k) T_{ b }
Appendix 3. Phase estimation from the peak of XWVD
The above indicates that the accuracy of the IIB-phase estimate depends greatly on the XTFR. Therefore, the duplicated terms must be removed to produce an optimal XTFR, in which we employ an adaptive window as a kernel function to preserve the auto-terms and attenuate the duplicated terms.
Appendix 4. Phase estimation from the peak of S-transform
The above equation has an additional term, 2πft which is not present in the IIB-phase estimate for AW-XWVD. This term removes the phase shift caused by the window function in the S-transform.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) Malaysia, for its financial support and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, for providing the resources for this research. In addition, one of the authors would like to thank the Qatar National Research Fund under its National Priorities Research Program award numbers NPRP 09-465-2-174 and NPRP 09-626-2-243 for funding his work. In addition, the authors would like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Sampei S, Harada H: System design issues and performance evaluations for adaptive modulation in new wireless access systems. Proc IEEE 2007, 95(12):2456-2471.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hussain A: Advanced RF Engineering for Wireless Systems and Networks. John Wiley & Sons, USA,; 2005.Google Scholar
- Krouk E, Semenov S: Modulation and Coding Techniques in Wireless Communications. John Wiley & Sons, UK; 2011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Proesch R: Technical Handbook for Radio monitoring HF. Books on Demand GmbH, Germany; 2009.Google Scholar
- Riter S: An optimum phase reference detector for fully modulated phase-shift keyed signals. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 1969, 5(4):627-631.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Viterbi AJ, Viterbi AM: Nonlinear estimation of PSK modulated carrier phase with application to burst digital transmission. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1983, 29(4):543-551. 10.1109/TIT.1983.1056713View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- David IB, Shtrikman I: Open loop frequency and phase estimation of a PSK modulated carrier. The 16th Conference of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Israel 1989, 1-4.Google Scholar
- Kim YH, Lee HS: New total carrier phase estimator in fully phase modulated signals. Electron Lett 1993, 29(22):1921-1922. 10.1049/el:19931279View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huq AT, Panayirci E, Georghiades CN: ML NDA carrier phase recovery for OFDM systems. In IEEE International Conference on Communications. Volume 2. Vancouver, Canada; 1999:786-790.Google Scholar
- Panayirci E, Georghiades N: Carrier phase synchronization of OFDM systems over frequency selective channels via EM algorithm. In IEEE Conference on Vehicular Technology Conference. Volume 1. Texas, USA; 1999:675-679.Google Scholar
- Panagirci E, Georghiades CH: Joint ML timing and phase estimation in OFDM systems using the EM algorithm. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Volume 5. Istanbul, Turkey; 2000:2949-2952.Google Scholar
- Linn Y: Robust M-PSK phase detectors for carrier synchronization PLLs in coherent receivers: theory and simulations. IEEE Trans Commun 2009, 57(6):1794-1805.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sklar B: Digital Communications, Fundamentals and Applications. 2nd edition. Prentice Hall, USA; 2006.Google Scholar
- Rohde , Schwarz : Spectrum Monitoring the ITU Way. News from Rohde & Schwarz. 1997., 1(153):Google Scholar
- Matic V, Lestar B, Tadic V: The use of digital signal processing for a modulation classification. In 11th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference. Cairo, Egypt; 2002:126-130.Google Scholar
- Martine C, Adrian F, Robert WJ: Radio spectrum management: overview and trends. In ITU Workshop on Market Mechanisms for Spectrum Management. Geneva, Switzerland; 2007:1-22.Google Scholar
- Yucek T, Arslan H: A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 2009, 11(1):116-130.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boashash B: Time Frequency Signal Analysis and Processing: A Comprehensive Reference. Elsevier, UK; 2003.Google Scholar
- Sha'ameri AZ, Boashash B, Ismail I: Design of signal dependent kernel functions for digital modulated signals. In Fourth International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications. Volume 2. Gold Coast, Australia; 1996:527-528.Google Scholar
- Sha'ameri AZ, Boashash B: The lag windowed Wigner-Ville distribution: an analysis method for HF data communication signals. Jurnal Teknologi, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 1999, 30: 33-54.Google Scholar
- Tan JL, Sha'ameri AZ: Adaptive optimal kernel smooth-windowed Wigner-Ville Bispectrum for digital communication signals. Signal Process 2011, 91(4):931-937. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2010.09.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tan JL, Sha'ameri AZ: Adaptive optimal kernel smooth-windowed Wigner-Ville distribution for digital communication signal. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2008, 2008: 408341. 17 10.1155/2008/408341View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chee YM, Sha'ameri AZ: Use of the cross time-frequency distribution for the analysis of the class of PSK signals. In IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering. Volume 1. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; 2010:1-5.Google Scholar
- Stockwell RG, Mansinha L, Lowe RP: Localization of the complex spectrum: the S-transform. IEEE Trans Signal Process 1996, 44(4):998-1001. 10.1109/78.492555View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boashash B: Estimating & interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal--part I: fundamentals. Proc IEEE 1992, 80(4):519-538.Google Scholar
- Boashash B: Estimating & interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal--part II: fundamentals. Proc IEEE 1992, 80(4):540-568. 10.1109/5.135378View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boashash B: Note on the use of the Wigner distribution for time frequency signal analysis. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 1988, 36(9):1518-1521. 10.1109/29.90380View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reilly A, Frazer G, Boashash B: Analytic signal generation-tips and traps. IEEE Trans Signal Process 1994, 42(11):3241-3245. 10.1109/78.330385View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hlawatsch F, Boudreaux-Bartels GF: Linear and quadratic time-frequency signal representations. IEEE Signal Process Mag 1992, 9(2):21-67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boashash B, O'Shea P: Use of the cross Wigner-Ville distribution for estimation of instantaneous frequency. IEEE Trans Signal Process 1993, 41(3):1439-1445. 10.1109/78.205752View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O'Shea P, Boashash B: Instantaneous frequency estimation using the cross Wigner-Ville distribution with application to nonstationary transient detection. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Volume 5. Albuquerque, USA; 1990:2887-2890.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jan J: Digital Signal Filtering, Analysis and Restoration. Institution of Electrical Engineers, UK; 2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Best RE: Phase-Locked Loops: Design, Simulation and Applications. 5th edition. McGraw-Hill, USA; 2003.Google Scholar
- Pinnegar CR, Mansinha L: The S-transform with windows of arbitrary and varying shape. Geophysics 2003, 68(1):381-385. 10.1190/1.1543223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nguyen T, Liao Y: Power quality disturbance classification utilizing S-transform and binary feature matrix method. Electr Power Syst Res 2009, 79(4):569-575. 10.1016/j.epsr.2008.08.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Assous S, Humeau A, Tartas M, Abraham P, L'Huillier JP: S-transform applied to laser Doppler flowmetry reactive hyperemia signals. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2006, 53(6):1032-1037. 10.1109/TBME.2005.863843View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Papoulis A, Pillai SU: Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Process. 4th edition. McGraw-Hill, USA; 2002.Google Scholar
- White LB, Boashash B: Cross spectral analysis of nonstationary processes. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1990, 36(4):830-835. 10.1109/18.53742View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jones G, Boashash B: Generalized instantaneous parameters and window matching in the time-frequency plane. IEEE Trans Signal Process 1997, 45(5):1264-1275. 10.1109/78.575699View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hussain ZM, Boashash B: Hilbert transformer and time delay: statistical comparison in the presence of Gaussian noise. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2002, 50(3):501-508. 10.1109/78.984723MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Drake J: Cramer-Rao bounds for M-PSK packets with random phase. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Signal Processing and Its Applications. Volume 2. Queensland, Australia; 1999:725-728.Google Scholar
- Barbier A, Colavolpe G: On the Cramer-Rao bound for carrier frequency estimation in the presence of phase noise. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 2007, 6(2):575-582.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cowley WG: Phase and frequency estimation for PSK packets: bounds and algorithms. IEEE Trans Commun 1996, 44(1):26-28. 10.1109/26.476092View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tavares GN, Tavares LA, Piedade MS: Improved Cramer-Rao lower bounds for phase and frequency estimation with M-PSK signals. IEEE Trans Commun 2001, 49(12):2083-2087. 10.1109/26.974254View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Srinath MD, Rajasekaran PK, Viswanathan R: Introduction to Statistical Signal Processing with Applications. Prentice Hall, NJ; 1996.Google Scholar
- Kay SM: Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs; 1993:50-53.Google Scholar
- Abdullah AR: Time-frequency analysis for power quality monitoring, PhD Dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 2011.Google Scholar
- Bhujade MR: Parellel Computing. 2nd edition. New Age Science, UK; 2009.Google Scholar
- Boashash B, Black P: An efficient real-time implementation of the Wigner-Ville distribution. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 1987, 35(11):1611-1618. 10.1109/TASSP.1987.1165070View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.