# DOA estimation for conformal vector-sensor array using geometric algebra

- Tianzhen Meng
^{1}, - Minjie Wu
^{1}Email authorView ORCID ID profile and - Naichang Yuan
^{1}

**2017**:64

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13634-017-0503-y

© The Author(s). 2017

**Received: **31 March 2017

**Accepted: **6 September 2017

**Published: **13 September 2017

## Abstract

In this paper, the problem of direction of arrival (DOA) estimation is considered in the case of multiple polarized signals impinging on the conformal electromagnetic vector-sensor array (CVA). We focus on modeling the manifold holistically by a new mathematical tool called geometric algebra. Compared with existing methods, the presented one has two main advantages. Firstly, it acquires higher resolution by preserving the orthogonality of the signal components. Secondly, it avoids the cumbersome matrix operations while performing the coordinate transformations, and therefore, has a much lower computational complexity. Simulation results are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

## Keywords

## 1 Introduction

The direction of arrival (DOA) estimation has received a strong interest in wireless communication systems such as radar, sonar, and mobile systems [1]. In this correspondence, the problem of DOA estimation is considered in the case of multiple polarized signals impinging on the conformal vector-sensor array (CVA). We name our target array CVA since it is a conformal array whose elements are electromagnetic vector sensors. Interest in this problem can be divided into two topics: (1) conformal array and (2) electromagnetic vector sensors.

A conformal antenna is an antenna that conforms to a prescribed shape. The shape can be some part of an airplane, high-speed missile, or other vehicle [2]. Their benefits include reducing aerodynamic drag, covering wide angle, space-saving and so on [3, 4]. Nevertheless, due to the curvature of the bearing surface, the far-field contribution in the incident direction of one element is different from that of others [5]. The pattern synthesis theorem is not available resulting from the fact that the conformal arrays can no longer be regarded as simple isotropic ones. In [4], Wang et al. proposed a uniform method for the element-polarized pattern transformation of arbitrary three-dimensional (3-D) conformal arrays based on Euler rotation. However, the Euler rotation involves cumbersome matrix transformations, and therefore, has a considerable computational burden. Zou et al. analyzed the 3-D pattern of arbitrary conformal arrays using geometric algebra in [6]. Nevertheless, this mathematical language was not transplanted to the DOA estimation. In view of this, Wu et al. combined the geometric algebra with multiple signal classification (MUSIC), termed as GA-MUSIC, to solve the DOAs for cylindrical conformal array [7]. It used short dipole as the element which made the array belong to a scalar array. In addition, the electromagnetic vector sensors are not taken into account.

As for the second point, we know the electromagnetic vector sensor can measure the three components of the electric field and the three components of the magnetic field simultaneously. And, considerable studies on the extensions of traditional array signal processing techniques to the vector sensors are available in literature. In [8], Nehorai concatenated all the output vectors into a long vector and derived the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB). However, the orthogonality of the signal components was lost in this case. In view of this, a hypercomplex model for multicomponent signals impinging on vector sensors was presented in [9]. This model was based on biquaternions (quaternions with complex coefficients). Subsequently, Jiang et al. introduced geometric algebra into the electromagnetic vector-sensor processing field [10]. However, the model cannot be applied to the conformal array since the pattern is assumed to be a scalar and the same for each element.

In this correspondence, we will combine the electromagnetic vector sensors with the conformal array, and present a unified model based on geometric algebra to estimate the DOAs. The proposed technique in this paper is regarded as a generalization of the one presented in [10] to the case of the conformal arrays. Compared with existing methods, the proposed one has two main advantages. Firstly, it can give a more accurate estimation by preserving the orthogonality of the signal components. Secondly, it largely decreases the computation complexity for the coordinate transformations are avoided. In addition, it has a strong commonality, that is to say, it is not limited to any specific conformal array.

The rest of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, some notations about geometric algebra are briefly introduced, and on this basis, the manifold for the conformal vector-sensor array is derived. Section 3 analyzes the computational burden. Illustrative examples are carried out to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in Section 4, followed by concluding remarks.

Throughout this correspondence, we use lowercase boldface letters to denote vectors and uppercase boldface letters to represent matrices for notational convenience. Moreover, the uppercase letters symbolize the multivectors whenever there is no possibility of confusion. Superscripts “*”, “T”, and “H” represent the conjugation, transpose, and conjugate transpose, respectively. In addition, (⋅)^{+} and (⋅)^{~} symbolize the conjugate transpose in geometric algebra and the reverse operator, respectively. Finally, \( {\Re}_3^{mn} \) stands for the *m* × *n* real matrix in 3-D space and *E*{⋅} denotes the expectation operator.

## 2 The proposed algorithm

### 2.1 Some notations about geometric algebra

Geometric algebra is the largest possible associative algebra that integrates all algebraic systems (algebra of complex numbers, matrix algebra, quaternion algebra, etc.) into a coherent mathematical language [11]. In view of its widespread usage in subsequent sections, it is worthwhile to review some notations about geometric algebra before proceeding to the physical problems of interest.

Properties of the outer product

Property | Meaning |
---|---|

Anti-symmetry | (x ʌ y) = − (y ʌ x) |

Scaling | x ʌ (γy) = γ(x ʌ y) |

Distributivity | x ʌ (y + z) = (x ʌ y) + (x ʌ z) |

Associativity | x ʌ (y ʌ z) = (x ʌ y) ʌ z |

*k*vectors a

*k*-blade. The value of

*k*is referred to as the grade of the blade. Specially, the top-grade blade E

_{ n }in an

*n*-dimensional space is called pseudo-scalars. Essentially, blades are just elements of the geometric algebra. It is noted that we restrict the discussion to 3-D Euclidean space [12], that is, a space with an orthonormal basis {e

_{ x }, e

_{ y }, e

_{ z }}. As shown in Fig. 1, E

_{3}is the pseudo-scalar, relative to the origin denoted by O. The three-blade is drawn as a parallelepiped. The volume depicts the weight of the three-blade. Nevertheless, blades have no specific shape.

*a*

_{0},

*a*

_{1}, …,

*a*

_{7}are real numbers. For e

_{ x }, e

_{ y }, e

_{ z }are mutually orthogonal, using the definition of the geometric product, (5) can be represented by another shape.

*A*〉

_{ k }means to select or extract the grade

*k*part of

*A*and the reverse of 〈

*A*〉

_{ k }can be calculated as follows

*A*is given

*θ*. The rotation can be regarded as two consecutive reflections, first in a, then in b. Correspondingly, the expression that reflects x in the line with direction a is

The expression appears to be strange at first, but it is actually one of the most important rationales why the geometric product is so useful.

As shown in Eq. (11), R is identified as the rotor. If we want to rotate a vector counterclockwise by a specific angle, we only need to apply the rotor to the vector. And, the rotation must be over twice the angle between a and b. In Appendix 1, a brief proof is given.

### 2.2 Complex representation matrix (CRM)

_{0}, A

_{1},…, A

_{7}\( \in {\Re}_3^{mn} \). Thus, the CRM can be defined as

*ψ*(A), then the following equalities stand

_{ m }being the identity matrix of dimension

*m*×

*m*. Properties (14) and (15) can be verified by direct calculation using Eq. (16) and Eq. (17). For e

_{ xyz }is isomorphic to complex imaginary unit

*j*[9],

*ψ*(A)can be regarded as a complex matrix. Then, all the operation rules of the complex matrix are applicable to

*ψ*(A). Some properties [15] which will be used in the sequel are listed as follows.

- a)
A = B⇔

*ψ*(A) =*ψ*(B); - b)
*ψ*(A + B) =*ψ*(A) +*ψ*(B) ,*ψ*(AC) =*ψ*(A)*ψ*(C); - c)
*ψ*(A^{+}) =*ψ*^{+}(A).

_{2m }and Q

_{2m }will be of use in the forthcoming calculations.

- d)
\( {\boldsymbol{P}}_{2m}{\boldsymbol{P}}_{2m}^{+}={\boldsymbol{I}}_m; \)

- e)
\( {\boldsymbol{P}}_{2m}^{+}{\boldsymbol{P}}_{2m}\psi \left(\boldsymbol{A}\right)=\psi \left(\boldsymbol{A}\right){\boldsymbol{P}}_{2n}^{+}{\boldsymbol{P}}_{2n}; \)

- f)
\( {\boldsymbol{Q}}_{2m}={\boldsymbol{Q}}_{2m}^{+}. \)

### 2.3 Manifold modeling of vector sensors in the conformal array

*M*×

*N*cylindrical conformal array as shown in Fig. 3. The array contains

*N*uniformly spaced rings on the surface. In addition, there are

*M*electromagnetic vector sensors distributed on each ring. The angle between two consecutive elements on the same ring is

*β*. In addition, the radius of the cylinder and the distance between adjacent rings are

*R*and

*W*, respectively.

*E*

_{ x },

*E*

_{ y },

*E*

_{ z }) and the three magnetic field components (

*H*

_{ x }.

*H*

_{ y },

*H*

_{ z }) can be measured simultaneously. Thus, we can use two multivectors,

*X*

_{ e }and

*X*

_{ h }, to represent the electric field signal and the magnetic field signal, respectively.

_{ xyz }not only provides a vital link between electric field components and magnetic field components, but also offers the possibility to handle the data model in geometric algebra. Due to the limited length, the relationship between the two fields will be derived in Appendix 2. In addition, from (18, 19, 20, and 21), we see that the orthogonality of the signal components is reserved. Compared with the conventional methods, such as the long vector algorithm [8], this orthogonality constraint implies stronger relationships between the signal components. The proof can be seen in Appendix 3. And it is also the most important advantage of the output model. Using the Maxwell equations in the formalism of geometric algebra, Eq. (22) can be written in another shape.

*S*

_{ E }being the complex envelope of the electric field. In addition, the signal has an elevation angle

*θ*and an azimuth angle

*φ*. The derivation of (23) is omitted here and the interested reader will find more material in [10].

*S*

_{ E }, can be written as

*γ*) and the polarization phase difference (

*η*), that is,\( \boldsymbol{h}={\left[\cos \gamma \kern1.5em \sin \gamma {e}^{{\boldsymbol{e}}_{xyz}\eta}\right]}^{\mathrm{T}} \). And

*S*is the multivector symbolizing the complex envelope of the signal. Moreover, the parameter

*Θ*denotes the steering vector of the angle field [17] and is independent of the space location:

*M*×

*N*elements. In addition, suppose that there are

*K*narrowband sources impinging on the array. The manifold of the conformal array as shown in Fig. 3 corresponding to the

*k*th source is

*g*

_{ mn }(

*θ*

_{ k },

*φ*

_{ k }),

*m*= 1,2,…,

*M*,

*n*= 1,2,…,

*N*is the element pattern in the array global Cartesian coordinate system. In subsequent equations the range of

*m*and

*n*is the same and is omitted. R

_{ mn }and

*λ*

_{ k }are the (

*m, n*)th element location vector and the

*k*th signal wavelength respectively. The received signals of the array are the superposition of the response of each signal, the output can be expressed as

*X*

_{ k }is a special case of

*X*regarding the

*k*th source. And

*S*

_{ k }being the complex envelope of the

*k*th signal. For notational convenience, we will simply write A instead of A(

*θ*

_{ k },

*φ*

_{ k },

*γ*

_{ k },

*η*

_{ k }) whenever there is no possibility of confusion.

Let us refer back to Eq. (28). It is worthwhile to note that the aforementioned manifold of the conformal array, a
_{
sk
}, is derived under the global coordinate system. The azimuth and elevation angles are defined in Fig. 3. In most ready-made algorithms, the element pattern, *g*
_{
mn
}(*θ*
_{
k
}, *φ*
_{
k
}), is always considered to be identical. Nevertheless, due to the effects of the curvature of conformal carriers, the above assumption is not satisfied in the cylindrical conformal array.

*m*,

*n*)th element as shown in Fig. 4.

_{ xmn }axis is the same as e

_{ x }axis in the global coordinate system, e

_{ zmn }is perpendicular to the element surface and e

_{ ymn }is tangent to the surface which can form a standard Cartesian coordinate system. Then, transforming the global coordinate into the local one is equivalent to rotating the global coordinate about e

_{ x }axis. The corresponding rotation angle is

_{ z }and e

_{ y }for b and a, respectively (see Appendix 1, the exponential form of the rotor), the rotor is

_{ 3 }

*=*e

_{ x }e

_{ y }e

_{ z }as the pseudo-scalar in 3-D Euclidean space, Eq. (33) can be further simplified

Thus, from (35, 36 and 37), we can obtain the element pattern, *g*
_{
mn
}(*θ*
_{
k
}, *φ*
_{
k
}).

*δ*means the spacing between adjacent rings. Then, the mainfold of the conformal vector-sensor array, A, can be obtained.

Since the geometric algebra is introduced in modeling the manifold, the eigendecomposition is different from the conventional methods, such as [18]. In fact, similar to the quaternion case [19], the noncommutativity of the geometric product leads to two possible eigenvalues, namely the left and the right eigenvalue. However, in this paper, we select the right eigenvalue since the right eigendecomposition of A can be converted to the right eigendecomposition of the CRM.

Here, we assume that the noise is identical and uncorrelated from element to element, with covariance*σ*
^{2}.

_{ Y }is a unitary matrix, its eigendecomposition can be written as

_{ Y s }is the

*MN*x

*K*matrix composed of the

*K*eigenvectors corresponding to the

*K*largest eigenvalues of R

_{ Y }, termed as the signal subspace. U

_{ Y n }represents the matrix composed of the eigenvectors corresponding to the 2

*M*–

*K*smaller eigenvalues, i.e., the noise subspace. According to the principles of the MUSIC algorithm, the array manifold spans the signal subspace and is orthogonal to the noise subspace. In this case, we have

**0**

_{2M − K }is a 2

*M*–

*K*row vector with all elements equal zero. The proof can be seen in Appendix 5.

_{ Y }, is always used as the covariance matrix. Among which,

*L*represents the number of snapshots. In this case, (41) becomes

Up to present, the DOA estimation model of conformal vector-sensor array has been established. This is also the focus of our paper. The contents of constructing the spatial spectra and searching the peak are omitted here. The readers can refer to literature [18]. It is worthwhile to note that in introducing the rotor, the spatial location of the sensor is not required. Then, the proposed method can be easily extended to other arrays.

It is also worthwhile to note that {e
_{
x
}, e
_{
y
}
*,*
e
_{
z
}} is not only the basis for the multivector in the vector-sensor array, but also represents the coordinate in the conformal array. And, it can be used for transformation between the global and the local coordinates with the help of the rotor. Under this circumstance, there are some links between those two arrays. The commonality is one of the motivations for establishing a unified model to estimate the DOAs.

## 3 Complexity analysis

To better explain the superiority of the geometric algebra in modeling the conformal vector-sensor array, we will introduce the computational complexity from the standpoint of deriving the manifold. And, the computational burden is evaluated in terms of the number of multiplications, additions, and transpositions.

*C*,

*D*, and

*F*are, respectively, three consecutive Euler rotation angles about e

_{ x }axis, e

_{ y }axis and e

_{ z }axis. The matrices R

_{ x }(

*C*), R

_{ y }(

*D*), and R

_{ z }(

*F*) are the corresponding Euler rotation matrices. It is noted that two successive Euler rotations are usually adequate to deal with the cylindrical conformal array. The third Euler rotation matrix is added here to cope with some irregular or special conformal arrays. Additionally, we know the rotation matrix is invertible from Eq. (43). Consequently, taking the inversion with respect to R(

*C*,

*D*,

*F*), we have

Thus, R(*C*, *D*, *F*) is the so-called orthogonal matrix. In this case, transforming the local coordinate into the global one is equivalent to imposing the transposition/inversion with respect to the above rotation matrix. If we model the conformal array based on the Euler angle, three matrix multiplications and one matrix transposition are required for each element.

*M*×

*N*electromagnetic vector sensors, the transformation between different coordinates involves 91 × 6 ×

*MN*operations. Compared with the Euler rotation angle, the proposed method effectively avoids the cumbersome matrix transformations. From Eqs. (35, 36, and 37), we know e

_{ ymn }and e

_{ zmn }are independent of e

_{ x }. In addition, e

_{ xmn }can be obtained directly from Eq. (35) without extra operations. Thus, Eqs. (35, 36 and 37), can be expressed as a 2 × 2 matrix. While using the rotor to establish the array manifold, the computational process is equivalent to a 2 × 2 matrix multiplied by a 2 × 1 vector. In this case, the operations for each element involve four multiplications and two additions. The total amount of operations is 6 × 6 ×

*MN.*Thus, the geometric algebra-based method significantly decreases the computational burden.

The computational complexity of the proposed method and Euler angle

Multiplications | Additions | Transpositions | Operations | |
---|---|---|---|---|

Euler angle | 2 × 9 × 3 × 6 × | 2 × 9 × 2 × 6 × | 6 × | 91 × 6 × |

Proposed method | 4 × 6 × | 2 × 6 × | 0 | 6 × 6 × |

In general, the Euler rotation and its matrix representation cannot intuitively exhibit the complete procedure. In addition, as the configuration of the conformal array becomes more irregular and complex, the level of complexity involved in the transformations and the number of calculations required increases largely.

## 4 Simulation results

*M*and

*N*as 4 and 4, respectively. The angle between two consecutive elements on the same ring,

*β*, is 5°. The number of snapshots,

*L*, is 200. Under these premises, 200 independent simulation experiments are carried out. The root mean square error (RMSE) is utilized as the performance measure and is defined as

*i*th run.

**(**T1) and the second source (T2), respectively, to verify it. Figure 6 shows the RMSE versus SNR with the snapshots being 200. It can be seen that the proposed method outperforms the Qi’s method [3] by preserving the orthogonality of the received signal components. In addition, the performance of Gao’s algorithm is also worse than the proposed one. Two main reasons lead to this difference. Firstly, the proposed method imposes stronger constraints between the components of the signals. Secondly, the conformal array in [20] essentially belongs to the scalar array from the standpoint of elements while the conformal vector-sensor array presented in this paper belongs to the vector array. And the vector array contains more signal information compared with the scalar array. Moreover, in contrast to those two algorithms, the proposed one effectively avoids the cumbersome matrix transformations, and therefore, has a much lower computational complexity. It is noted that, for the statistical data have certain randomness, the simulation curve in Fig. 6 is not smooth.

*L*.

*x*-axis (or the abscissa) represents the product of

*M*and

*N*. It can be seen that the multiplications take up the most resources. Compared with Euler rotation angles, the proposed method reduces the computation by one order of magnitude. Thus, the proposed algorithm provides the possibility for real-time processing.

## 5 Conclusions

In this correspondence, we combine the electromagnetic vector sensors with the conformal array, and present a unified model based on geometric algebra to estimate the DOAs. Compared with existing methods, the proposed one has two main advantages. Firstly, it can give a more accurate estimation by preserving the orthogonality of the signal components. Secondly, it avoids the cumbersome matrix operations while performing the coordinate transformations, and therefore, has a much lower computational complexity. In addition, it has a strong commonality, that is to say, it is not limited to any specific conformal array. The simulation results verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for the improvement of this paper.

### Funding

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.61302017).

### Authors’ contributions

Tianzhen MENG conceived the basic idea and designed the numerical simulations. Minjie WU analyzed the simulation results. Naichang YUAN refined the whole manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Lu Gan, Xiaoyu Luo. Direction-of-arrival estimation for uncorrelated and coherent signals in the presence of multipath propagation, IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 2013, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 746-753, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-map.2012.0659
- Lars Josefsson, Patrik Persson. Conformal Array Antenna Theory and Design, IEEE Press Series on Electromagnetic Wave Theory, 2006, ISBN:978–0–471-46584-3Google Scholar
- Z. -S. Qi., Y., Guo., B. -H. Wang. Blind direction-of-arrival estimation algorithm for conformal array antenna with respect to polarisation diversity, IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 2011, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 433-442, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-map.2010.0166
- B. H. Wang, Y. Guo, Y. L. Wang, Y. Z. Lin. Frequency-invariant pattern synthesis of conformal array antenna with low corss-polarisation, IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 2008, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 442-450, ISSN:1751-8725, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-map:20070258
- P. Alinezhad, S.R. Seydnejad, D. Abbasi-Moghadam, DOA estimation in conformal arrays based on the nested array principles. Digit. Signal Process.
**50**, 191–202 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2015.12.009 View ArticleGoogle Scholar - L. Zou, J. Lasenby, Z. He, Pattern analysis of conformal array based on geometric algebra, IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 2011, vol. 5, no. 10, p. 1210-1218, ISSN: 1751-8725, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-map.2010.0588
- W.U. Minjie, Z.H.A.N.G. Xiaofa, H.U.A.N.G. Jingjian, Y.U.A.N. Naichang, DOA estimation of cylindrical conformal array based on geometric algebra. Int J Antennas Propagation
**2016**, 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7832475 Google Scholar - A. Nehorai, E. Paldi, Vector-sensor array processing for electromagnetic source localization. IEEE Trans. Signal Process.
**42**(2), 376–398 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1109/78.275610 View ArticleGoogle Scholar - N.L. Bihan, S. Miron, J. Mars, MUSIC algorithm for vector-sensors array using biquaternions. IEEE Trans. Signal Process.
**55**(9), 4523–4533 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2007.896067 MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - J.F. Jiang, J.Q. Zhang, Geometric algebra of euclidean 3-space for electromagnetic vector-sensor array processing, part I: modeling. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
**58**(12), 3961–3973 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2010.2078468 MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Venzo De Sabbata, Bidyut Kumar Datta. Geometric Algebra and Applications to Physics. CRC Press, 2007, ISBN: 978-1-58488-772-0Google Scholar
- J.W. Arthur,
*Understanding geometric algebra for electromagnetic theory*(IEEE Press, New Jersey, 2011) ISBN: 978-1-118-07854-3View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Dietmar Hildenbrand. Foundations of geometric algebra computing, 2013, Springer, ISBN: 978–3–642-31793-4, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31794-1
- Leo Dorst, Daniel Fontijne, Stephen Mann. Geometric Algebra for Computer Science, 2007, Morgan Kaufmann, ISBN: 978-0-12-369465-2Google Scholar
- John Snygg. A New Approach to Differential Geometry Using Clifford’s Geometric Algebra, Birkhäuser, 2010, New York, ISBN: 978-0-8176-8282-8Google Scholar
- DESCHAMPS G. A. Techniques for handling elliptically polarized waves with special reference to antennas: part II-geometrical representation of the polarization of a plane electromagnetic wave. Proc. IRE, 1951, vol. 39, p. 540-544. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1951.233136
- W.U. Minjie, Y.U.A.N. Naichang, DOA estimation in solving mixed non-circular and circular incident signals based on the circular array. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M
**53**, 141–151 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERM16092105 View ArticleGoogle Scholar - R. Schmidt, Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.
**AP-34**(3), 276–280. ISSN: 0018-926X (1986). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1986.1143830 View ArticleGoogle Scholar - S. Miron, N.L. Bihan, J.I. Mars, Quaternion-MUSIC for vector-sensor array processing. IEEE Trans. Signal Process.
**54**(4), 1218–1229 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2006.870630 View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ziyang Gao, Yong Xiao. Direction of arrival estimation for conformal arrays with diverse polarizations, 2015 12
^{th}IEEE International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments, pp. 439–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMI.2015.7494229 - P. Stoica, A. Nehorai, MUSIC, maximum likelihood, and Cramer-Rao Bound. IEEE TRANS. ACOUSTICS SPEECH SIGNAL PROCESSING.
**37**(5), 720–741. ISSN: 0096-3518 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1109/29.17564 MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar