- Research Article
- Open Access

# A New Method for Least-Squares and Minimax Group-Delay Error Design of Allpass Variable Fractional-Delay Digital Filters

- Cheng-Han Chan
^{1}, - Soo-Chang Pei
^{2}and - Jong-Jy Shyu
^{3}Email author

**2010**:976913

https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/976913

© Cheng-Han Chan et al. 2010

**Received:**28 February 2010**Accepted:**22 December 2010**Published:**4 January 2011

## Abstract

A double-loop iterative method is proposed to design allpass variable fractional-delay (VFD) digital filters basing on the minimization of root-mean-squared group-delay error. In the inner loop, an iterative quadratic optimization is proposed to replace the original nonlinear optimization for the minimization of root-mean-squared group-delay error, while an iterative weighting-updated technique is applied in the outer loop to further reduce the maximum group-delay error. Several examples will be presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and good convergence of the proposed method.

## Keywords

- Outer Loop
- Digital Filter
- Comb Filter
- Fractional Delay
- Minimax Design

## 1. Introduction

For the past decade, the design of variable fractional-delay (VFD) digital filters became an important topic in digital signal processing due to their wide applications in signal processing and communication systems such as comb filter design, sample rate conversion, tunable modulator and acoustic system [1–5]. Since Farrow proposed an effective structure for implementing variable digital filter [6], several works concerning VFD filter design have been presented, including an excellent tutorial paper by Laakso, and so forth [7], FIR-based design [8–11], IIR-based design [12, 13] and allpass-based design [14–24] with their respective feature.

In this paper, the design of allpass VFD digital filters is investigated on the possible minimization of root-mean-squared group-delay error. Among the existing literature in which allpass structure is applied, most applications concern the minimization of phase-oriented error, and only [23] focuses on the minimization of root-mean-squared group-delay error by converting a nonlinear optimization problem to a linear least-squares (LS) optimization problem.

In this paper, an alternative method will be presented with comparable performance. Likely, the direct approximation of group-delay response is a highly nonlinear problem, so an iterative quadratic optimization will be proposed to overcome it in this paper. Then a weighting-updated technique [11, 25] is proposed to further reduce the maximum group-delay error of the designed system, which constitutes the outer loop of the overall process while the iteration stated above makes up the inner loop.

It is also pointed out in [26] that if the allpass filter design has a phase approximating error less than at it must be stable. In this paper, although there is no theoretical proof, it can be found that the designed allpass VFD filter is usually stable when mean delay of the desired response is equal to the order of the designed allpass filter and the range of adjustable parameter is properly assigned.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the review of conventional weighted least-squares (WLS) design (as Deng's method [21]) basing on the minimization of phase-oriented error and frequency-response-oriented error is given, and it will be shown that both will lead to the same solution. The formal formulation for LS group-delay error design of allpass VFD filters will be presented in Section 3, in which an iterative method is proposed to replace the original nonlinear optimization of group-delay-oriented error. Then in Section 4, a weighting-updated technique is proposed to further reduce the maximum group-delay error, and design examples will be given to demonstrate the effectiveness and good convergence of the proposed double-loop iterative method. Also, an example with a different range of the adjustable variable is given to show the significant effect on overall performance, which has also been revealed in [14, 24]. Finally, the conclusions are given in Section 5.

## 2. Review of Deng's Method of Allpass VFD Digital Filters

which is used to approximate (2) as much as possible over the region .

### 2.1. Phase-Oriented Approximation

### 2.2. Frequency-Response-Oriented Approximation

Hence, both phase- and frequency-response-oriented approximations will lead to the same solution.

### 2.3. WLS Solution of the Design Problem

## 3. LS Group-Delay Error Design of Allpass VFD Digital Filters

When is small enough, for example, smaller than , where is a preassigned very small positive constant, the iterative process can stop. In this paper, is used. As to the initial coefficient vector , we can adopt the solution in (18) by setting . The details of iterative procedures will be described in the next section.

respectively. To compute (29), the frequency and the variable are uniformly sampled at step sizes and , respectively.

Example 1.

Comparison of evaluated errors in (29).

Method | Design time (seconds) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|

0.242 | 0.03145 | 0.001205 | 0.0001788 | 0.38 | |

Lee, Caccetta, and Rehbock's method [23], LS design, | 0.0992 | 0.005276 | 0.002199 | 0.0000718 | 3.19 |

0.1474 | 0.004137 | 0.002312 | 0.0000707 | 28.36 | |

0.04464 | 0.001927 | 0.000724 | 0.0000543 | 28.13 | |

Lee, Caccetta and Rehbock's method [23], WLS design, | 0.155 | 0.002836 | 0.00307 | 0.0000838 | 58.63 |

0.1964 | 0.002966 | 0.003235 | 0.0000834 | 148.76 | |

0.0664 | 0.001189 | 0.001141 | 0.0000365 | 196.56 |

## 4. Minimax Group-Delay Error Design of Allpass VFD Digital Filters

In this section, a weighting-updated technique is proposed to minimize the maximum group-delay error of an allpass VFD filter obtained in Section 3, which constitutes the outer loop of the overall process while the iteration in Section 3 makes up the inner loop. The overall iterative process is described in detail below.

Step 1.

Given , , , and , set , and find the initial coefficient vector by (18).

Step 2.

Set the inner iterative counter .

Step 3.

Increase the inner iterative counter by 1, and calculate , , , and .

Step 4.

Find the coefficient vector by (27).

Step 5.

If the condition is satisfied, go to the next step; otherwise go to Step 3.

Step 6.

occurs for the first outer iteration only. Find the absolute error ripples of , and denote the th ripple with ripple interval by , , where is the number of ripples in . Then search the maximum value and the minimum value of , .

Step 7.

where is a preassigned very small positive constant. If the condition is satisfied, stop the process; otherwise go to the next step.

Step 8.

Step 9.

Calculate
**,**
in (17) and replace
by
. Then go to Step 2.

Example 2.

Following Example 1, the allpass VFD filter is continuously designed with minimax group-delay error. If is used, the design took thirteen outer iterations and the respective inner iterations are three and two in the first and second outer iterations, and one in the others. Figure 3(d) presents the final group-delay errors, and the errors computed by (29) are also listed in Table 1. To illustrate the stability of the designed filter, the maximum pole radius is shown in Figure 3(e), which shows that the designed filter is stable since the poles are all inside the unit circle for .

Example 3.

Filter coefficients for the proposed LS design in Example 3.

| |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |

1 | −0.995911478379215 | 0.003037237182070 | 0.000674977600074 | 0.002203931411874 | −0.001547094931521 |

2 | 0.491860988660958 | 0.489906840770088 | −0.004126440722118 | −0.004968604465653 | −0.000451455145871 |

3 | −0.321238701261896 | −0.480959682281854 | −0.155527315538002 | 0.009336078160601 | 0.002875779605052 |

4 | 0.234086131719820 | 0.429265271544100 | 0.228966726293102 | 0.025840785057596 | −0.005934120518170 |

5 | −0.180442437563948 | −0.376964115092541 | −0.258474768641364 | −0.058885621354534 | 0.001432724569099 |

6 | 0.143669792117880 | 0.329957770218435 | 0.265616427088872 | 0.083096234713679 | 0.005227747340939 |

7 | −0.116657162172812 | −0.288508807455575 | −0.260564239814727 | −0.098781179155452 | −0.011492189916140 |

8 | 0.095861039125088 | 0.251939854553747 | 0.248549917352264 | 0.107475439484688 | 0.016441996382781 |

9 | −0.079319256800620 | −0.219538064590932 | −0.232515100469996 | −0.110719224055686 | −0.019869040384123 |

10 | 0.065857103009291 | 0.190720077751894 | 0.214249655962206 | 0.109824100478193 | 0.021858526125015 |

11 | −0.054726435065962 | −0.165033191450544 | −0.194914864048044 | −0.105865858472555 | −0.022611233785938 |

12 | 0.045425714251763 | 0.142128041436134 | 0.175304729171998 | 0.099719296033186 | 0.022361719532284 |

13 | −0.037603022298150 | −0.121728204225754 | −0.155979945905486 | −0.092096431614038 | −0.021344479562458 |

14 | 0.031001228444685 | 0.103608784007633 | 0.137345198030118 | 0.083574882334005 | 0.019774852983403 |

15 | −0.025425012312619 | −0.087578010616568 | −0.119690472293712 | −0.074621308011672 | −0.017844113508204 |

16 | 0.020720915083929 | 0.073467158589459 | 0.103220353275063 | 0.065607022593667 | 0.015713946630399 |

17 | −0.016764317587889 | −0.061120833690438 | −0.088069015325893 | −0.056822176308913 | −0.013518649356740 |

18 | 0.013451438220377 | 0.050393631010479 | 0.074315411373739 | 0.048485405849704 | 0.011363357432515 |

19 | −0.010693672377723 | −0.041145191376987 | −0.061990029855892 | −0.040754079903763 | −0.009328571849153 |

20 | 0.008414281412575 | 0.033240476434287 | 0.051085766424762 | 0.033731771771784 | 0.007469846563140 |

21 | −0.006545751741101 | −0.026547275109895 | −0.041561893474693 | −0.027476917314175 | −0.005823266602704 |

22 | 0.005028471552094 | 0.020938283213411 | 0.033353508964552 | 0.022009510808459 | 0.004405809839568 |

23 | −0.003809384590832 | −0.016289718620921 | −0.026374265528517 | −0.017318832133697 | −0.003221101051906 |

24 | 0.002841516201697 | 0.012484128343807 | 0.020525052306191 | 0.013369584615560 | 0.002259936792143 |

25 | −0.002083164017217 | −0.009409316711960 | −0.015695742339824 | −0.010108579318228 | −0.001505805273695 |

26 | 0.001497755497971 | 0.006961232471637 | 0.011773041636065 | 0.007470070929259 | 0.000935170532813 |

27 | −0.001053228383405 | −0.005042751228794 | −0.008641133167121 | −0.005381083473594 | −0.000522366521324 |

28 | 0.000721982433284 | 0.003566279107085 | 0.006188479311859 | 0.003765621798479 | 0.000239360156968 |

29 | −0.000480297868477 | −0.002452163386710 | −0.004307224739879 | −0.002548399099865 | −0.000059778977985 |

30 | 0.000308285023293 | 0.001630854379561 | 0.002898818696283 | 0.001657749575799 | −0.000041970396936 |

31 | −0.000189289826257 | −0.001040887457275 | −0.001872166300857 | −0.001027714173915 | 0.000087596983292 |

32 | 0.000109818709357 | 0.000630593764138 | 0.001148101727283 | 0.000599713352933 | −0.000096409825026 |

33 | −0.000058932273691 | −0.000355717936032 | −0.000656467669958 | −0.000323254739076 | 0.000082969883834 |

34 | 0.000028159894437 | 0.000180788324236 | 0.000339826063819 | 0.000157105923634 | −0.000058660087578 |

35 | −0.000010912672360 | −0.000076734250069 | −0.000151603214037 | −0.000073350022415 | 0.000026749510599 |

Filter coefficients for the proposed minimax design in Example 3.

| |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|

| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |

1 | −0.995993596236449 | 0.002951361938129 | 0.000056522430938 | 0.003227364563976 | −0.002459241277563 |

2 | 0.492019060719535 | 0.490165494401252 | −0.002681420024658 | −0.006345896805414 | −0.000444700949259 |

3 | −0.321471225422751 | −0.481418973949900 | −0.157782729637916 | 0.010673985821541 | 0.003558502797986 |

4 | 0.234388948779710 | 0.429936634960839 | 0.232014003186862 | 0.024803935644968 | −0.007082100578430 |

5 | −0.180809553898889 | −0.377848777076039 | −0.262282154813875 | −0.058330113715328 | 0.002858896290434 |

6 | 0.144093799282764 | 0.331049886098540 | 0.270138023365234 | 0.083140840476517 | 0.003671971963968 |

7 | −0.117129820320514 | −0.289799197810240 | −0.265745946995025 | −0.099497954673552 | −0.009920842069164 |

8 | 0.096372854062878 | 0.253409909828576 | 0.254315329105907 | 0.108894154915106 | 0.014947469673871 |

9 | −0.079860248869537 | −0.221163954074996 | −0.238774548835977 | −0.112836471202399 | −0.018523661245126 |

10 | 0.066417235371802 | 0.192475127776987 | 0.220905131511245 | 0.112605063283127 | 0.020710959749977 |

11 | −0.055295700680418 | −0.166886921064048 | −0.201858125775743 | −0.109247481340844 | −0.021690925658959 |

12 | 0.045994562958711 | 0.144048641408887 | 0.182424468016734 | 0.103618709513285 | 0.021681689765273 |

13 | −0.038162626126081 | −0.123683810542076 | −0.163165397984585 | −0.096416215678346 | −0.020903696245568 |

14 | 0.031543613480551 | 0.105568113889007 | 0.144488637747372 | 0.088206732231356 | 0.019558989262805 |

15 | −0.025943254665904 | −0.089511445430816 | −0.126690976298732 | −0.079454047897343 | −0.017831187066804 |

16 | 0.021209234821121 | 0.075347332574665 | 0.109985232980534 | 0.070527891068195 | 0.015873812332757 |

17 | −0.017218205011616 | −0.062923918561836 | −0.094518367293347 | −0.061725532030323 | −0.013818324456679 |

18 | 0.013867583703075 | 0.052099069080072 | 0.080381481983181 | 0.053273169499334 | 0.011767529430927 |

19 | −0.011069999914064 | −0.042736331042533 | −0.067618950223505 | −0.045340098661654 | −0.009802870961721 |

20 | 0.008749913929641 | 0.034705233910870 | 0.056239697296178 | 0.038045151627557 | 0.007982131561675 |

21 | −0.006840717660722 | −0.027876032814163 | −0.046213102316074 | −0.031459203715713 | −0.006345583922439 |

22 | 0.005284001340328 | 0.022127902740351 | 0.037494541869108 | 0.025622074058447 | 0.004913569954169 |

23 | −0.004027273226697 | −0.017338667620351 | −0.030005448553794 | −0.020536165254725 | −0.003696194040458 |

24 | 0.003024238308363 | 0.013394444480610 | 0.023658566786054 | 0.016180658703661 | 0.002688753419761 |

25 | −0.002233814412328 | −0.010187262429483 | −0.018357061617550 | −0.012518726197641 | −0.001880234103510 |

26 | 0.001619612427739 | 0.007614467619845 | 0.013993527079620 | 0.009494927822061 | 0.001251724331496 |

27 | −0.001149754797462 | −0.005581013645482 | −0.010458788127664 | −0.007046111678278 | −0.000781330341624 |

28 | 0.000796663861173 | 0.004000709213585 | 0.007645263913791 | 0.005101208642714 | 0.000441439263909 |

29 | −0.000536633718021 | −0.002795599745994 | −0.005449025857033 | −0.003589487278191 | −0.000206255609100 |

30 | 0.000349545529838 | 0.001895830247705 | 0.003770427414620 | 0.002441776327828 | 0.000053417213621 |

31 | −0.000218498674617 | −0.001239482351210 | −0.002517028536055 | −0.001596601179870 | 0.000032333826084 |

32 | 0.000129607420879 | 0.000773720821702 | 0.001606542109353 | 0.000996204580929 | −0.000067169661349 |

33 | −0.000071635910779 | −0.000454306657023 | −0.000967504900344 | −0.000587397249461 | 0.000068485823988 |

34 | 0.000035791801597 | 0.000245674851842 | 0.000539971198304 | 0.000321069026938 | −0.000055829905847 |

35 | −0.000015815837778 | −0.000125519073336 | −0.000300465948474 | −0.000202997633437 | 0.000015539277740 |

## 5. Conclusions

In this paper, a double-loop iterative method has been proposed to minimize the root-mean-squared group-delay error in LS and minimax senses for the design of allpass VFD digital filters. For the LS design, an iterative quadratic optimization is used in the inner loop, while a weighting-updated technique is further applied to minimize the maximum group-delay error in the outer loop. From the presented experiments, it has been shown that the performance in group delay and phase for the proposed systems can be improved drastically by appropriately specifying the range of fractional delay. For the computational complexity, although the design time of the proposed method is much more than the existing methods, an alternative method has been revealed in this paper for further research in the future.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Pei SC, Tseng CC: A comb filter design using fractional-sample delay.
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II*1998, 45(5):649-653. 10.1109/82.673650View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rajamani K, Lai YS, Farrow CW: Efficient algorithm for sample rate conversion from CD to DAT.
*IEEE Signal Processing Letters*2000, 7(10):288-290. 10.1109/97.870683View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sobot R, Stapleton S, Syrzycki M: Tunable continuous-time bandpass ΣΔ modulators with fractional delays.
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I*2006, 53(2):264-273.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Cho KJ, Park JS, Kim BK, Chung JG, Parhi KK: Design of a sample-rate converter from CD to DAT using fractional delay allpass filter.
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II*2007, 54(1):19-23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lehtonen HM, Välimäki V, Laakso TI: Canceling and selecting partials from musical tones using fractional-delay filters.
*Computer Music Journal*2008, 32(2):43-56. 10.1162/comj.2008.32.2.43View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Farrow CW: Continuously variable digital delay element.
*Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 1998*2641-2645.Google Scholar - Laakso TI, Välimäki V, Karjalainen M, Laine UK: Splitting the unit: delay tools for fractional delay filter design.
*IEEE Signal Processing Magazine*1996, 13(1):30-60. 10.1109/79.482137View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhao H, Yu J: A simple and efficient design of variable fractional delay FIR filters.
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II*2006, 53(2):157-160.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Deng TB, Lian Y: Weighted-least-squares design of variable fractional-delay FIR filters using coefficient symmetry.
*IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing*2006, 54(8):3023-3038.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Deng TB: Symmetric structures for odd-order maximally flat and weighted-least-squares variable fractional-delay filters.
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I*2007, 54(12):2718-2732.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Shyu JJ, Pei SC, Chan CH, Huang YD: Minimax design of variable fractional-delay FIR digital filters by iterative weighted least-squares approach.
*IEEE Signal Processing Letters*2008, 15: 693-696.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Zhao H, Kwan HK: Design of 1-D stable variable fractional delay IIR filters.
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II*2007, 54(1):86-90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Tsui KM, Chan SC, Kwan HK: A new method for designing causal stable IIR variable fractional delay digital filters.
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II*2007, 54(11):999-1003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Välimäki V:
*Discrete-time modeling of acoustic tubes using fractional delay filters, Doctoral thesis*. Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland; 1995.Google Scholar - Makundi M, Laakso TI, Välimäki V: Efficient tunable IIR and allpass filter structures.
*Electronics Letters*2001, 37(6):344-345. 10.1049/el:20010276View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Makundi M, Välimäki V, Laakso TI: Closed-form design of tunable fractional-delay allpass filter structures.
*Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 2001, Sydney, Australia*434-437.Google Scholar - Tseng CC: Eigenfilter approach for the design of variable fractional delay FIR and all-pass filters.
*IEE Proceedings: Vision, Image and Signal Processing*2002, 149(5):297-303. 10.1049/ip-vis:20020629Google Scholar - Tseng CC: Design of 1-D and 2-D variable fractional delay allpass filters using weighted least-squares method.
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I*2002, 49(10):1413-1422. 10.1109/TCSI.2002.803361MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Yli-Kaakinen J, Saramäki T: An algorithm for the optimization of adjustable fractional-delay all-pass filters.
*Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Cirquits and Systems, May 2004*3: 153-156.Google Scholar - Pei SC, Wang PH: Closed-form design of all-pass fractional delay filters.
*IEEE Signal Processing Letters*2004, 11(10):788-791. 10.1109/LSP.2004.835473View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Deng TB: Noniterative WLS design of allpass variable fractional-delay digital filters.
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I*2006, 53(2):358-371.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Hacihabiboǧlu H, Günel B, Kondoz AM: Analysis of root displacement interpolation method for tunable allpass fractional-delay filters.
*IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing*2007, 55(10):4896-4906.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lee WR, Caccetta L, Rehbock V: Optimal design of all-pass variable fractional-delay digital filters.
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I*2008, 55(5):1248-1256.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Shyu JJ, Pei SC, Chan CH: Minimax phase error design of allpass variable fractional-delay digital filters by iterative weighted least-squares method.
*Signal Processing*2009, 89(9):1774-1781. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.03.021View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Chi CY, Kou YT: A new self-initiated optimum WLS approximation method for the design of linear phase FIR digital filters.
*Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, June 1991*168-171.Google Scholar - Jing Z: A new method for digital all-pass filter design.
*IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing*1987, 35(11):1557-1564. 10.1109/TASSP.1987.1165067View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Lang M, Laakso TI: Simple and robust method for the design of allpass filters using least-squares phase error criterion.
*IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II*1994, 41(1):40-48. 10.1109/82.275662View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Nguyen TQ, Laakso TI, Koilpillai RD: Eigenfilter approach for the design of allpass filters approximating a given phase response.
*IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing*1994, 42(9):2257-2263. 10.1109/78.317848View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rajamani K, Lai YS: Novel method for designing allpass digital filters.
*IEEE Signal Processing Letters*1999, 6(8):207-209. 10.1109/97.774868View ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.